https://padlet.com/colby_martin/bkybbwpl2e62 en-us 2017-12-11 03:53:45 UTC 2023-03-02 12:51:37 UTC hello@padlet.com colby_martin https://padlet.com/colby_martin/bkybbwpl2e62/wish/214889489 maintains due process of law, prohibits self incrimination and double jeopardy]]> 2017-12-11 03:54:59 UTC https://padlet.com/colby_martin/bkybbwpl2e62/wish/214889489 colby_martin https://padlet.com/colby_martin/bkybbwpl2e62/wish/214958353 2017-12-11 11:04:02 UTC https://padlet.com/colby_martin/bkybbwpl2e62/wish/214958353 colby_martin https://padlet.com/colby_martin/bkybbwpl2e62/wish/214958483 Case Name: Miranda Vs. Arizona
Years the case took place: February- June 1966
What led to the case: Eirnesto Miranda was arrested from his house and interrogated about a kidnapping/rape crime. At the questioning he did not have an attorney present and felt the need to confess through a written note.
Taken to court: Miranda was not provided with a law official and felt it his confession was a result of unlawful practice of 5th amendment

]]> 2017-12-11 11:04:34 UTC https://padlet.com/colby_martin/bkybbwpl2e62/wish/214958483 colby_martin https://padlet.com/colby_martin/bkybbwpl2e62/wish/214958525 Freedom involved: No self- incrimination and due process of law through 5th amendment
Question for the court: Should Miranda have his 5th amendment right guaranteed in the interrogation room and be made aware of them?]]> 2017-12-11 11:04:45 UTC https://padlet.com/colby_martin/bkybbwpl2e62/wish/214958525 colby_martin https://padlet.com/colby_martin/bkybbwpl2e62/wish/214958590 The political carton developed below is a clear example of how the 5th amendment is used in court, and that it is perfectly legal (defense and prosecution have to find how to work with no answer).]]> 2017-12-11 11:05:01 UTC https://padlet.com/colby_martin/bkybbwpl2e62/wish/214958590 colby_martin https://padlet.com/colby_martin/bkybbwpl2e62/wish/214958601 In order to associate a face with the name, below you find an image of Miranda after his arrest.]]> 2017-12-11 11:05:03 UTC https://padlet.com/colby_martin/bkybbwpl2e62/wish/214958601 colby_martin https://padlet.com/colby_martin/bkybbwpl2e62/wish/214962354 US Supreme Court Decided: in a 5-4 ruling that the actions of the police did not follow the legal procedures of incrimination. Also, his 5th amendment rights apply not matter what and Miranda did not have to confess at all.
Importance: Showed that officials must read rights to a person who is being taken into custody]]> 2017-12-11 11:22:05 UTC https://padlet.com/colby_martin/bkybbwpl2e62/wish/214962354 colby_martin https://padlet.com/colby_martin/bkybbwpl2e62/wish/215017297 2017-12-11 14:17:29 UTC https://padlet.com/colby_martin/bkybbwpl2e62/wish/215017297 colby_martin https://padlet.com/colby_martin/bkybbwpl2e62/wish/215017707 Case Name: Blockburger V United States
Years the case took place: No exact date found- year of 1932
What led to the case: Harry Blockburger was convicted on the 2nd, 3rd, and 5th of 5 counts for illegally selling prescription drugs under the guidelines of the Harrison Narcotic Act.
Taken to court: Blockburger believed that the crimes were too similar in structure to be considered different crimes and punished separately. He thought the amount of drugs, buyer, and time should be similar enough to defend his point of view.]]> 2017-12-11 14:18:09 UTC https://padlet.com/colby_martin/bkybbwpl2e62/wish/215017707 colby_martin https://padlet.com/colby_martin/bkybbwpl2e62/wish/215017854 Freedom involved: Right to no double jeopardy from the 5th amendment
Question for the court? Can being penalized selling prescription drugs illegally in three different ways at three differing times (although similar), be considered violation of the idea of double jeopardy.]]> 2017-12-11 14:18:24 UTC https://padlet.com/colby_martin/bkybbwpl2e62/wish/215017854 colby_martin https://padlet.com/colby_martin/bkybbwpl2e62/wish/215017910 The United States' Supreme Court decided: In favor of the jury/court verdict; a slight change in crime will be held against an individual and will not be viewed as being incriminated twice for the exact same offense.
Importance: First case to further define the strictness of double jeopardy and set a precedent for future cases to be compared to.]]> 2017-12-11 14:18:30 UTC https://padlet.com/colby_martin/bkybbwpl2e62/wish/215017910 colby_martin https://padlet.com/colby_martin/bkybbwpl2e62/wish/215017977 This is Harry Blockburger, the one being tried against in the case.]]> 2017-12-11 14:18:37 UTC https://padlet.com/colby_martin/bkybbwpl2e62/wish/215017977 colby_martin https://padlet.com/colby_martin/bkybbwpl2e62/wish/215018080 The message below more clearly defines double jeopardy in a visual media. It describes how one person can not be charged twice for the same crime in one situation]]> 2017-12-11 14:18:44 UTC https://padlet.com/colby_martin/bkybbwpl2e62/wish/215018080