I might agree /disagree with Mr Minthorn’s statement if …….

When Mr Minthorn says the scientists need a book for something to be a fact, what might he really be saying?

2. I (might) agree/disagree with _____ if__________.

3. When the author says _____, it’s true/untrue because ____

4. When the author says______, it represents a fact/an opinion because _________.

2. I (might) agree with Mr Minthorn's if they he proves that it is true what happen ten thousands year ago.

3. When the author says that just cause its not written down, it’s true because most people don't believe unless its written down in a book or just written.

4. When the author says just cause its not written, it represents a fact because just cause its not written doesn't mean it's not real but it is written it don't mean it real it could be false information that's written.

1. I agree/disagree with Armand Minthorn because he stated some good reasons why they should study the body.

2. I (might) agree with Armand if he just wants to study them and not go further.

3. When the author says it could be the missing evidence we are missing, it’s true because this was the oldest intact skeleton they found.

4. When the author says the skull does not match the Indian skull, it represents a fact because the skulls do not share the same characteristics and appearance.

I might disagree with Mr Minthorn’s statement if he didn't tell us where he heard about life 10 thousand years ago.

When Mr Minthorn says the scientists need a book for something to be a fact, what might he really be saying?

That he's not 100% sure what happened along the river 10 thousand years ago, yet relying on what other Natives have told him.

2. I (might) agree with Mr Minthorn's if he gave us more information on the Kennewick man that's if he knows what he's doing.

3. When the author says , it’s true/untrue because ____

4. When the author says______, it represents a fact/an opinion because _________.

1. I agree with Armand Minthorn because he does make a good point about how the law says all native american remains should go to the tribe for proper burial .

2. I (might) disagree with Minthorn if he doesnt at least study and examine kennewick man once before they bury him.

3. When the author says kennewick man could've been caucasian , it might be because his head shape was long and narrow .

4. When the author says that Armand Minthorn doesnt want to know about what happened 9000 years ago, it represents an opinion because he says he knows what happened 9000 years ago because his elders told him.

2. I (might) agree/disagree with Armand Minthorn if they don't at least examine Kennewick man

3. When the author says that kennwick man should be examined, it’s true/untrue because he should be just be buried

4. When the author says Kennewick man is Caucasian, it represents a fact/an opinion because without examination we cant be sure.

2. I (might) agree/disagree with Minthorn if he doesnt at least study and examine kennewick man once before they bury him to prove that.

3. When the author says it could be the missing evidence we are missing, it’s true because this was the oldest intact skeleton they found.

4. When the author says just cause its not written, it represents a fact because just cause its not written doesn't mean it's not real but it is written it don't mean it real it could be false information that's written.

2. I (might) agree/disagree with Mr Minthorns if he don't want any scientist to study about the Kennewick man .

3. When the author says it could be a missing evidence that was missing its true because it was the oldest skeleton they found back then .

4. When the author says the skull don't match with Indians skull, it represents a fact because they do not share the same skull .

2) I agree with Mr Minthorn’s statement if what he said about what had happened nine thousand years ago could be told by his elders. So they could tell them everything about what they know and how they told them long ago with their traditions and cultures about how the scientist dug up the bones.

3) When Mr Minthorn says the scientists need a book for something to be a fact, what might he really be saying? He is really saying that the scientist doesn't believe what Mr Minthorn's statement and wants to have his own answer to what he thinks is true and what he thinks to be true will back up to what he thinks about Mr Kennewicks's bones and saying that he might actually be white and that the white people might actually be here before the natives so he wants to study him to examine and study him to find out what the heck happened nine thousand years ago.

I might agree with Mr Minthorn’s statement if he said something that proves that he might know about what happened ten thousand years ago.

When Mr Minthorn says the scientists need a book for something to be a fact, what might he really be saying? he might mean they need it to be written on paper to make it true.

I might agree with what Mr minthorn's statement has to say because being native has many things to it one being the elders have many stories to tell the younger people so the elders probably told him about the cultures and burial traditions
When Mr Minthorn says the scientists need a book for something to be a fact, what might he really be saying that scientists need all the facts to have evidence for them to believe it.

2. I (might) agree with Mr Minthorn's if he don't want any scientists to study the Kennewick man.

3. When the author says _____, it’s true/untrue because ____

4. When the author says______, it represents a fact/an opinion because _________.

don´t want to see him in a box

He is saying that the scientists dont listen to whats true.

I agree with Mr Minthorn’s statement because he was stating good reasons to why the remains should be buried so he can rest at peace once again.

I might disagree with Mr Minthorn’s statement if he was stating terrible reasons to bury the body because it would then seem like the body wasn't apart of

the Umitilla tribe

When Mr Minthorn says the scientists need a book for something to be a fact, what might he really be saying? Whenever Mr Minthorn states this he really means that scientist cannot believe what people say and have to look in a book for something simple.

I might agree with Mr Minthorn’s statement if he didn't mention about the "we live how we live since ten thousand years ago" I'm aware about the grave protection for native americans I understand why Mr Minthorn's only just wanted to bury one of their ancestor remains in peace but it's pretty frustrating for scientist or archeologist wasted opportunity of how native american lived ten thousand years ago accurately.

When Mr Minthorn says the scientists need a book for something to be a fact, what might he really be saying?

He might be saying that a singular informational book can be a fact to our daily lives and how people live in the past he did in fact mention about his past relatives to each generation how they lived ten thousand years ago.

Prompt: Agree or Disagreei agree cause with Mr Minthorn's

1. statement because im feeling the a agreement with it cause when Mr Minthorn says scientits need a book

2. For for something to be fact for them to view the fact from some I agree / disagree with Mr Minthorn’s statement because ……
   I might agree

   I (might) agree with Mr Minthorn's if they he proves that it is true what happen ten thousands year ago.

   3. When the author says that just cause its not written down, it’s true because most people don't believe unless its written down in a book or just written.

   4. When the author says just cause its not written, it

he's sayin that scientist doesn't believe things that they are told.

2. I (might) agree with Armond if he just wants to study them and not continue further.

3. When the author says it could be missing evidence that we are missing,it’s true because that was the oldest intact skeleton they had discovered.

4. When the author says the skull does not match a Native American skull because the skull does not share the same appearance and characteristics as the "Native American" skull they found before.

statement because the feeling with the agreement or disagreement when mr minthorn said that scienctis need a book but he clams that he knows what happen 10,000 years ago from the tribe of the older generation from the tribe was traced to the people after 10,000 years and i agree with his statement Congressional meeting that his people knew what happened ten thousand years ago along the Columbia River and why is it true that Kennewick Man really is a relative to the Umatilla Tribe

I might agree with Mr. Minthorn's statement if he had more proof on why he thinks the man is from the tribe and some more clarification or understanding about why the Kennewick Man may be from the Umatilla tribe. I also might agree if he gave more proof to the people and most definitely evidence.

When Mr. Minthorn says the scientists need a book for something to be a fact, what might he really be saying?

I think that Mr. Minthorn may be saying that people only rely or trust what is said in the books and that it is the only way that people may find belief in a certain thing. But overall i believe Mr. Minthorn is saying that a book is not needed for something to be true.

and probably when he was kid

his grandparents probably told him about

how they were around all these years.

I might agree more with Mr Minthorn’s statement if he talk more about kennawick man being a native American.

When Mr Minthorn says the scientists need a book for something to be a fact, what might he really be saying? reason why Mr Minthron says that they need a book because they will believe anything that will

come out of a book,and will not believe a person that knows how long his people been around.

2. I Agree with his statement.

3. When Mr Minthorn is questioned about this information and knowledge he claims he knows, and people ask him where did he read it he responded by he doesnt need a book he knows its fact.

4. When Mr Minthorn says people need a book to study upon and have information in their hand for it to be fact?The people and scientist dont believe him and thinks hes making it all up on the spot to avoid confrontation about this subject in the near future.

I might agree with Mr Minthorn’s statement if he can bring in some elders to help prove his point on what he's saying.

When Mr Minthorn says the scientists need a book for something to be a fact, what might he really be saying?

I think what he's saying is that scientists need a book in order to see if a thing is true

I might agree with Mr Minthorn's statement if he where to have showed more proof and more answers.

Whenever Mr Minthorn says the scientists need a book for something he really means the scientists cant believe what people say and have to look in the book for something

2. I (might) agree with Mr Minthorn's statement if he said something that proves that he might know about what happened ten thousand years ago .

3. When the author says the scientists need a book for something to be a fact , what might he really be saying? He might mean they need it to be written on paper to make it true.He also might be saying that a singular informational book can be a fact to our daily lives and how people live in the past he did in fact mention about his past relatives to each generation how they lived ten thousand years ago.

2. I (might) agree with Mr Minthorns he doesn't need any proof to prove anything because he believes and has elders to tell stories also they don't need a book to know if its a fact or not.

3. When the author says , it’s true/untrue because

4. When the author says______, it represents a fact/an opinion because _________.

the head shape of the Kennewick man could be Caucasian, European. Meaning the Umatilla tribe do not have the rights to the remains

I might agree with Mr Minthorn’s statement if there was any evidence in the area where the Kennewick man was found

along with Native american cultural belongings proving that he might be Native.

When Mr Minthorn says the scientists need a book for something to be a fact, what might he really be saying?

they need a book for something to be factual.

2. I might agree with Mr Minthorn’s statement if it's what he was told by his elders then I believe it's real.
When Mr Minthorn says the scientists need a book for something to be a fact, what might he really be saying?

I think he is saying people usually believe what is written. But something written isn't always a fact.

2. I (might) agree/disagree with _____ if__________.

3. When the author says _____, it’s true/untrue because ____

4. When the author says______, it represents a fact/an opinion because _________.

2. I might agree with Mr. Minthorn if he had told us more about Kennewick man instead of just repeating "10,000 years ago" and talking about himself.

I might agree with Mr Minthorn's

statement if there were more of Kennewick man’s belongings was found along with Kennewick man, like Native American cultural belongings proving that he was an Native American from 9,000 years ago.

2. I (might) agree with Armand Minithorn's if he had anyone from ten thousand years ago to tell him

3. When the author says "that his people knew what happened ten thousand years ago" it’s untrue because no one from that time would be alive today to tell te story

4. When the author says that his people knew what happened ten thousand years ago it represents an opinion because maybe people pasted down storys to their and their kids passed down to their kids

2. I agree with Mr. Minthorn he has a better statement about Kennewick mans remains.

2. I might agree with Armand Minthorn's statement if there was more evidence along with Kennewick man when they found him.

3. When the author says , it’s true/untrue because ____

4. When the author says______, it represents a fact/an opinion because _________.

2. I (might) agree/disagree with _____ if__________.

3. When the author says _____, it’s true/untrue because ____

4. When the author says______, it represents a fact/an opinion because _________.

2. I (might) agree with Armand if he wants to study & look into the remains with nothing more.

3. When Mr Minthorn says the scientist need a book for something to be a fact, what might be really be saying? He could mean that it needs to written out on paper or in a book for it to be true/real & for people to believe it , because what they could read & make connections to is what they would want to trust & rely on.

4. When the author says the skull they found doesn't match an Indian skull, is a fact that not all Indian skulls don't share the same appearance, or any type of skull in any matter are all different considering sizes & shapes.

I might agree with Mr. Minthorn's statement if showed more proof of what happened but we need more answer of his statement

Whenever Mr.Minthorns says that they need more books or whatever scientist uses to what happened to that person but it fact what he might be really saying about that?

2. I (might) agree with Armand if he wants to study & look into them with nothing more.

3. When Mr Minthorn says the scientist need a book for something to be a fact, what might be really be saying? He could mean that it needs to written out on paper or in a book for it to be true/real & for people to believe it , because what they could read & make connections to is what they would trust & rely on.

2. I might disagree with the scientist fully if Mr. Minthorn gave more reasons about what happened a long time ago and how it was but I still think that he is true about scientists only wanting to believe about what's in a book.

3. When Mr. Minthorn is questioned about this information and knowledge he claims he knows, and people ask him where he read it he responds that he doesn't need a book. He knows that it's a fact.

4. When Mr. Minthorn says people need a book to study upon and have information in their hand for it to be fact? it represents a fact because scientists only want to believe in something they can and see out of a book or an article.

I might agree with Mr. Minthorn's statement if he gave us more information on why he thinks Kennewick Man is related or connected to the Umatilla tribe. And I might almost agree more if Mr. Minthorn gave more evidence to the people that are listening, not just by saying that the stories his elders told him are enough to know what happened ten thousand years ago.

When Mr. Minthorn says the scientists need a book for something to be a fact, what might he really be saying? I think the Mr. Minthorn may be saying that the scientist will only believe what books tell them, and give them more detail about what was studied about ten thousand years ago and not just believing in what a Native American heard from his elders that as passed down from ten thousand years ago, which that information might not be true to itself.

2. I might disagree with Mr. Minthorn if he didn't give us a great example of what our people do and their teachings. But I feel that caucasians and other races wouldn't understand our culture and what our people teach and learn.

3. When the author says a certain thing about our traditional beliefs just because it’s not written down or not accurate ,because most people don't believe anything unless its been written down or in a book.

2. I might agree with Mr. Minthorns statement because there if was more evidence of kennewick man being native.

3. When the author says _____, it’s true/untrue because ____

4. When the author says______, it represents a fact/an opinion because _________.

I might disagree with Mr. Minthorn's statement if he didn't grow up with people that told him about the past.

2.I might disagree with Mr Minthorn’s statement if he wouldn't have given a good example of how the Natives past down stories down and on how the Native

Americans lived and how they taught other generations about their knowledge and culture.

3.When Mr Minthorn says the scientists need a book for something to be a fact, what might he really be saying? I feel when Mr.Minthorn says that I think he means that most people would believe anything that's written down in a book or the internet.

2. I might disagree with Armand Minthorn's statement if I was caucasian because I wouldn't understand the importance of being taught about our ancestors just by stories.

3. When Armand Minthorn says people need a book to believe it, it represents a fact because we all can't rely on just what people say to us because it also can be interpreted into different words.

2. I might disagree with Mr. Minthorn's statement if he was more specific on his opinion, Or set a better example and explained a little better.

3. When Mr. Minthorn's says that "they need to make more books for something to be a fact", it’s true because other scientists may need more information just in case they find more Native remains, that way they will have it much more easier for them.

4. When the author says that Kennewick mans skull does not match the shape of an Native skull, it represents that the Sientists are trying to say that the Umatilla tribe is wrong because their going off a skull that's been underground for almost 10,000 years and anything can go wrong.

I disagree with Mr. Minthorn's statement because as I listened to him, I didn't hear much information or proof about the Kennewick Man being from the Umatilla tribe nor statements to tell us about what happened to the man and how he is so sure that he is from the nearby residing tribe.

I might agree with Mr. Minthorn's statement if he had more proof on why he thinks the man is from the tribe and some more clarification or understanding about why the Kennewick Man may be from the Umatilla tribe. I also might agree if he gave more proof to the people and most definitely evidence.

When Mr. Minthorn says the scientists need a book for something to be a fact, what might he really be saying?

I think that Mr. Minthorn may be saying that people only rely or trust what is said in the books and that it is the only way that people may find belief in a certain thing. But overall i believe Mr. Minthorn is saying that a book is not needed for something to be true.

2. I might agree with Armand Minthorn's Statement if he gave more information about how Kennewick Man is related to them and that he belongs to the Tribe.

1. I disagree with Mr. Minthorn's statement because there is no empirical evidence or scientific consensus to support the claim that any group of people has knowledge of specific events from ten thousands years ago along the river.

2. I (might) agree with Mr. Minthorn's if he was referring to oral traditions or cultural stories that have been passed down through generations. While these stories may provide valuable insight into the history of the Umatilla Tribe, they should be considered within the context of cultural mythology rather than historical fact.

3. When Mr. Minthorn's says that his people knew what happened ten thousand years ago along the river, it’s untrue because there is no direct evidence or documentation to verify such as claim.

2. I might disagree with Mr.Minthorn's statements if the scientist provides enough evidence that it's not Native American but, they also discovered that the shape of Kennewick Man isn't like any other Native Americans.

3. When the author says it is Native American, it’s true because as we know that the scientist studying Kennewick Man, found out that in his DNA he is Native American of the Umatilla Tribe.