<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>War on terror by Norafidah Ismail</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n</link>
      <description>Summary of the article</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2017-11-16 11:34:55 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2017-11-17 18:44:58 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>syahira 240966</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207617733</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The war of terror conduct by America has badly ruined its reputation as the "world's policemen". States are not fully trust America anymore to bring peace using the right method. This is because of massive destruction and loss of lives during war of terror. It took on too many tasks of too great difficulty with too much haste, too much passion and too few resources. Recently, the phenomena of globalisation has contribute to spreading of terrorism. States are being sceptic with the ability of America to solve this problem. States afraid that America would did the same mistake thus causing another massive destruction.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-16 12:22:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207617733</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Saiful 236302   Terrorism is considered to be a global threat. Everything start with the 9/11 attacks. The costs of the attack and the responses to them were staggering in both by blood and money. And its also plays with people psychological, people are now afraid in the term terrorism. For more than a decade after the event, many organization and states especially United States has initiated a campaign in fighting terrorism. The campaign was initiated by military response, economic blocking and creation of legal against the threat of terrorism. Especially for Muslim people. However the response and actions by President Bush are too much. His military actions on Iraq has a negative effect because they did not plan carefully on the post political circumstances after Saddam Hussein been overthrown. An attempt to give democracy in Arab country by US was failed. The actions by President Bush has made even more people in the middle east country to join the terrorist group such as Al-Qaeda and so on. The problem will became a serious threat to the global peace if they did not planning it right to overcome it.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207618677</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-16 12:26:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207618677</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Nurul Zahirah (236363)</title>
         <author>zahirah37</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207620770</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div> The article written by Gideon Rose is about the challenges and response to the war on terror. He said that after the 9/11 attacks and followed by the war on terror, the costs of the attacks and the responses to them were staggering. The campaign was inevitable that the attacks would make the fight against al Qaeda and other jihadists the top priority of American policy. And given the complexities involved, it was inevitable that this fight would last a long time and present many controversial policy choices along the way. What was not inevitable was that the attacks would also produce a major shift in America’s approach to the world, the launching of a costly war in an unrelated country, and an enduring state of siege. The writer also listed out several reasons he George W. Bush administration overdid it after 9/11. One was basic human psychology, a cognitive version of Newton’s third law of motion and the administration plunged forward. The other reason is the foreign policy in Bush’s second term was a care taking effort with little ventured and little gained. Bush’s final months in office saw a financial collapse that sent the country and the globe into deep recession, deepening the gloom. Barack Obama inherited an economic catastrophe, a divided country, and two ongoing wars, one of which was heading in the wrong direction.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-16 12:34:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207620770</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Aina Irfatnin (239949)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207622287</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The article discussed on terrorism on terror which was marked as a crucial threats to nation starting September, 11, 2001 and now it expand rapidly in the world. Because of the threat of terrorism, generations of policymakers in Washington and allied capitals have nurtured and guarded their precious offspring, keeping at bay a host of dangers including war and aggression, economic nationalism, disruption and chaos. In the 1990, as the threat of great power conflict decrees and globalization took off, many countries or parties began to take their safety and prosperity for granted.&nbsp;<br><br></div><div>Most terrorists were believed to pursue limited political objectives and feared retribution. The most likely source of those dangers was a violent strain of Islamism, an activist movement devoted to purifying the Muslim world and restoring the glories of the medieval caliphate. Psychology alone would not have been enough to trigger the policies that emerged as it required a larger intellectual and structural context. This is where Middle Eastern politics and American hegemony come into the picture. They instilled fear and a desire for revenge, loosened the domestic constraints on the deployment of American power, and led not simply to increased counterterrorist efforts but to a grand campaign to achieve total security by fundamentally transforming a broad of the world. So, a lot of violent attacks make people live in fear, anger and depression.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-16 12:40:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207622287</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Fariesha 240291</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207623372</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The war on terror is basically established because of the incident of 9/11. After this incident, United States focus on all of their military resources to counter-attack the terrorism. There is also a new policy that made by Bush which is attacking the terrorism has become the main agenda in the United States. United States had changed from promoting the democracy which is all about the importance of the human rights to become a radical when it comes to terrorism. Bush actually had overreacted about handling the 9/11 incident. He even attacked Iraq because he believed that Iraq had the mass destructive weapon but the information is not true as there is no such thing in Iraq. Bush even said that if people are not on United States, they are supporting the terrorism. His thinking is too radical as this world is not only consists of white and black area. This has make people live in fear, anger and chaotic.&nbsp;<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-16 12:43:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207623372</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Nik Elia 240733</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207623617</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The American national safety expert concerned about the prospect of a great power was has diminished, but the malignancy seems to become a real and growing danger. The challenges and US responses in term of consolidates, protect, and expand the international liberal order that appears in the west after WW2. This order gives advantage to US through local economy, social, and politic development. But what went wrong is the United States recognizes that the global war on terror is armed conflict or was a set forth in the law of war, then should also implemented in humanizer in context of the global war on terror. But in fact, in cases of arrests of members of the Al-Qaeda people who are associated with Al-Qaeda, the American military do interpretations-interpretations of place against humanitarian law . For example the arrest of David Hicks and HabibMahmoud. The US Government often violated the law of the United States even humanitarian law is not ratified Protocol I of the Geneva Conventions<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-16 12:44:43 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207623617</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>NAZERE</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207625475</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The article is about War on Terror by United States. The issue of terrorism after the tragedy of 9/11 attacks, contribute huge impacts on U.S. foreign policy. The United States put fight against terrorism as one of the main agenda in the their foreign policy. This is because since the tragedy, the terrorism activities keep growing and become one of dangerous non-traditional security threat. Therefore, U.S. had launches the campaign to solve the problem of terrorism in middle east before it becomes more worse and give tramendous effects toward international community. Many efforts have been taken by U.S. to improve their security and one of them is improvement in intelligence. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-16 12:50:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207625475</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Anis Ashikin 240806</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207626305</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>War on terror  begin after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Many states and organization has initiated to fighting the terrorism especially the United States. For the past several decade, United States has face challenges in their foreign policy in order to consolidate, protect and extend the liberal international order that emerged it and spread it globally after the Cold War II. The top priority of American policy is to fight against terrorism and other jihadists. One of the reasons why Bush Administration overdid it is because basic human psychology. Other than that, the new administration had chosen to concentrate its attention on other security issues such as Iraq, China and missile defense.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-16 12:53:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207626305</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Adilah Rosri (237980)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207627707</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Based on the article written by Gideon Rose, the increasing of terrorism instead of power war contributes to the doubtful to United States' ability in solving their own problems. The doubtful of United States' ability persists due to the 9/11 attacks and it cause huge challenges to the foreign policy of the United States.&nbsp; The most important challenge that have faced by the United States is liberal international order which is in this matter, the U.S have to protect,&nbsp; consolidate and extent it so that it can be as a frame work to the local economic, social and politics development. &nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-16 12:57:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207627707</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Salahuddin 238310</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207628278</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Based on Gideon Rose&nbsp; article's about war on terror, the terrorism&nbsp; seemed a real and growing danger. In article also&nbsp; touch about nuclear and&nbsp; global trade. In additional, political problem happen at same time in a war like Republicans in<br>Congress.&nbsp; Critics charge that the "war on terrorism" is an ideology of fear and repression that creates enemies and promotes violence rather than mitigating acts of terror and strengthening security. The worldwide campaign has too often become an excuse for governments to repress opposition groups and disregard international law and civil liberties. Governments should address terrorism through international cooperation, using international law and respecting civil liberties and human rights. Governments should also address the root causes of terrorism, notably political alienation due to prejudice, state-sponsored violence and poverty.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-16 12:58:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207628278</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>SIRIN 239482</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207630907</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;</div><div>The article mentioning on the War on terror and the central challenge to United State foreign policy. There are three kind of US foreign policy that author mentioned namely consolidate, protect, and extend the liberal international order which is benefiting to US and the others countries in world. The first challenge that facing by US is threat of terrorism attack. For example, the bigger attack where it happened on 9/11/2001 in New York that killed thousands of people. This challenge has been become a concern to US and the writer have mentioned ‘It was inevitable that the attacks would make the fight against al Qaeda and other jihadists the top priority of American policy’.&nbsp; Besides, to counter the terrorism, the Bush administration strengthened global counter terrorist operations and intelligence gathering, and paid more attention to homeland security.&nbsp;</div><div>Second is threat by the great power conflict that also driven by globalization. They began to take their safety and prosperity for granted.&nbsp;<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-16 13:06:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207630907</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Nur Azwani 239729</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207632182</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In 1990s, terrorism became one of the major problem to the states such as U.S due to the globalization. States became to focus on their security matter. On September 11, 2001, these concerns merged when a score of radical Islamists from a group called al Qaeda hijacked four civilian jets and flew them into targets in New York and Washington, killing thousands. Then, U.S top priority policy began to shift towards to the fight against al-Qaeda and other jihadists. At first, within months of 9/11, all members of the organization responsible for the attacks had been killed, captured, or driven into hiding. The government that had given the attackers shelter and support was overthrown, with a pro-Western regime installed in its place. But the ball kept rolling. The Bush team’s , combined with a desire to act vigorously in the Middle East, led it to settle on Iraq as its next target. The invasion of Iraq proceeded smoothly,but ran into&nbsp; trouble when it turned out that the administration did not have the planning for the post-Saddam era. In the first half of 2011, a string of popular democratic uprisings broke out in the Arab world, and Osama bin Laden was found and killed. But the bitter taste of the past decade lingered, especially since the rest of the world had used its time and resources more wisely, reinforcing a sense of U.S. decline.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-16 13:09:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207632182</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Maira Shahini 243175</title>
         <author>mairahayati45</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207633842</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;</div><div>The challenge we face here is to understand individual and organisational responses to low probability, high impact events, and to develop strategies to overcome the weaknesses of these responses and manage these risks. The 9/11 attack resulted in the change of the US Foreign Policy. We could see as the growth of the globalization had make the policymaker and leader to rethink on how to ensure everything is under control what constitutes an effective approach to deal with the threat of terrorism. In the aftermath of 9/11 attack, we knew that The United State was revising its national security structure.&nbsp; There are many reasons why Bush took such actions during his administration. It simply because the attack by the radical group, Al-Qaeda was during the rise of American country. In addition, Al-Qaeda whom aim to re-shape the Muslim world have a quite strong political and economic in the Middle East. Literally, the attack was reminded the American with the Pearl Harbor attack the geopolitical effect of the 1950 communist invasion of South Korea. The challenge we face here is to understand individual and organisational responses to low probability, high impact events, and to develop strategies to overcome the weaknesses of these responses and manage these risks. Barrack Obama got to deal with the catastrophic economic prior to the Bush action to combat the terrorist.&nbsp;<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-16 13:14:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207633842</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>basyirah 242106</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207633876</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>this article is about war on terror and the biggest challenge to US foreign policy as well. this article also discussing on the arising of terrorism and it seemed a real and growing danger till today. US see that this problem are really dare them to solve it by their current policy. the existence of terrorism group at least put the higher costs of the attacks and the responses to them were staggering not only in blood and treasure but also in</div><div>psychological stability as well. the terrorism group are al-qaeda. even thought this terrorism group are more powerful now, but they are not a winner because their objective and goal are not clear and transparent. so, US has introduce their foreign policy as to address and to control the movement of terrorist group such as  consolidate, protect, and extend the liberal international order. This order at last has</div><div>been the framework within which local economic, social, and political development has</div><div>proceeded, to the lasting benefit of both the United States and the world at large. the evolution of movement of terrorist group are flow by the globalization. their propaganda are seems holy enough, like violent strain of Islamism, an activist movement devoted to purifying the Muslim world, overthrowing “apostate” regimes there, and restoring the glories of the medieval caliphate. but actually there are agenda behind it.  for instance, On</div><div>September 11, 2001, these concerns merged when a score of radical Islamists from a group</div><div>called al Qaeda hijacked four civilian jets and flew them into targets in New York and Washington, killing thousands. so that the reasons why the George W</div><div>. Bush administration overdid it after 9/11. US as a big and superpower state are obligated to overcome and cut the movement of this terrorist group from keep arise and make world worst in future</div><div><br></div><div>  </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-16 13:14:17 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207633876</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>CHE ZARINA BINTI CHE JAMALUDDIN 239996         The war on terror was implemented by United States President on that time, George W. Bush after United States was attacked on September 11. This war on terror is no longer a foreign matter in today’s world where the terrorism is getting bigger and bigger from day to day, year to year in many ways.  The war on terror has its own challenge where terrorism gained new importance as ever-increasing waves of goods and people flooded across borders, presenting both targets and cover for nontraditional extremists simultaneously appearing on the scene. The September 11th, 2001 was strengthening their opinion that Islamism is the most danger threat to the world. It was inevitable that the attacks would make the fight against al Qaeda and other jihadists the top priority of American policy. Some of them think that the 9/11 attacks had the psychological effect of Pearl Harbor and the geopolitical effect of the 1950 communist invasion of South Korea. But, at the end, anything that Bush plan to do are just in vain because they did the task in rushing and that task are not their abilities. </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207635206</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-16 13:17:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207635206</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>NINI SUHANA</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207636698</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>240261<br>Based from the article that has written by Gideon Rose is about the challenges and response to the war on terror. He has stated that, after 9/11 attack and followed by the war on terror the world has change a lot to become much darker place than before. There has been a challenge for the united states in the past several decades in terms of local economic, social, and political development. Besides, United Stated also has face difficulty in their foreign policy because of the top American policy is to fight the terrorism. Apart from that, there are some reasons that administration of George W.Bush overdid after 9/11 which is basic human psychology. The administration has focus on the security issues such as Iraq, China, and missile defense</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-16 13:21:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207636698</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>KOH 239483</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207637044</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This article is about challenge for the U.S. foreign policy and the response after the 911 terrorist attacks. The U.S embraced the liberal international order that can bring prosperity for the country while it was posing terrorism threat due to the economic globalization and the desire of the radical Islamists to restore the Muslim world. After the 911 terrorist attack, there were controversial policy that had been implemented under the administration of George W.Bush. The sudden and disastrous 911 terrorist led the administration team to engage in self-reflection. The misplaced of national interest priority and embarrassment at having failed as well as the dysfunctional of administration made the U.S policymakers to redesign a new foreign policy that not simply to respond to the terrorists but involved security intelligence, inculcated the desire for revenge as well as to easily deploy the armed forces. Under the administration of Bush, the policies were mainly preemption, division between friends and enemies. However, these policies have little gained and costly. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-16 13:22:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207637044</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> Farhana 238594</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207637417</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Based on the article "The War on Terror" written by Gideon Rose, it seems that terrorism is real and growing danger. Because of the threats, generations of policymakers in Washington and allied capitals have nurtured and guarded their precious offspring, keeping at a bay host of dangers-war and aggression, economic nationalism, disruption and chaos. In the 1990s, many within this order began to take their safety and prosperity for granted, as the threat of great power conflict receded and globalization took off. Terrorism posed a growing problem. Experts used to say that terrorist wanted to see a lot of people watching, not a lot of people dead. This can be seen  when most terrorist pursued limited political objectives and feared retribution. The most likely source of those dangers was a violent strain of Islamism, an activist movement devoted to purifying the Muslim world, and restoring the glories of the medieval caliphate.<br>It was inevitable that the attacks would make the fight against Al Qaeda and other jihadist the top priority of American policy. This fight would last a long time and present may controversial policy choices along the way. The attacks would also produce a major shift in America's approach to the world, the launching of a costly war in an unrelated country.<br>Psychology alone would not have been enough to trigger the policies that emerged because those required a larger intellectual and structural context, one offering a broadly accepted motive and opportunity for the deployment of U.S. power abroad.This is where Middle Eastern politics and American hegemony come into the picture. The Bush team’s lowered tolerance for risk, combined with a desire to act vigorously in the Middle East, led it to settle on Iraq as its next target. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-16 13:22:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207637417</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Wan Azida 242824</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207653459</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>For me war on terror started when U.S propagate thw September 11 2001 attack where people around the world started to spread that Muslim are terrorist. This led to President Bush declared War on Terror and American describe it as a global counter terrorism because it response to the September 11 2001 attack</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-16 13:55:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207653459</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Tan 237699</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207690727</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>After the War of Terror, the shift of focus towards terrorism provided policy space to address security threats via the three pillars of the Bush administration's national security policy. The pillars were missile defence, pre-emption and homeland security. The pre-emptive strikes were a strategy that sought to defend by attacking those who imposed an immediate security threat to the United States (US).&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;The September 2002 National Security Strategy of the United States, explicitly declines to narrow the definition of the enemy: The enemy is not a single political regime, or person, or religion, or ideology. The enemy is terrorism. The United States has deployed troops and conducted military operations against some other groups, including the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU) in Afghanistan and Ansar al Islam in Iraq.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-16 14:51:16 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207690727</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Muhammad Azrul (238876)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207975661</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This article discuss about war of terror that established after 9/11 incident to combat terrorist. Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaeda are terrorist that exist at that time. Many of terrorist wanted to see all people watching, not a lot of people dead. Many of terrorist in the world are muslim. After Al-Qaeda hijacked  four civilian jets and flew them into targets in N.Y, that cause many controversial between west and muslim until now. The attack cause Bush implement this concept. Some country  not take this issues as a serious case and concentrate its issues on other security issues.  </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-17 04:09:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207975661</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ahmad Amirul 240244</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207988494</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>This article discuss about the challenges and response towards war on terror. In this article mention that war or terror start after 9/11 attacks in New York, after this incident US start focus on all of their military resource to counter the terrorism. Combat the terrorism is the main agenda the US provide in they policy under Bush administration. However the response and actions by President Bush are too much. Example in his military action on Iraq, due to that action has made the more people wants to join the terrorist group especially Al Qaeda and also US failed in spread the democracy in Arabs states because of overreact and unplanned strategies. <br></strong><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-17 06:39:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/207988494</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>IZWAN ISMAIL (239791</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/208244599</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Based on the article of " The War on Terror in retrospect anatomy of An Overreaction" written by Gideon Rose, he emphasize that the prospect of great power war has decreased. However, terrorism threat is there and growing. Among the issue highlighted is the nuclear proliferation especially in the Persian Gulf and South Asia.<br><br>The writer divide his article to a few part. Those part give us the information about the challenge, response, what have been wrong and the plan of the book. According to the writer, the aggressive Islamism do promote terrorism in current world. Gideon also emphasized that Bush reaction after the 9/11 tragedy is harsh. The invasion of Iraq run smooth but it left something to the invaded country.<br><br>From my point of view, War on Terror is good. However, it is the best to apply it without any weapon. The best solution of any conflict is by peace.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-17 18:33:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/norafidah/b9lqs8plp98n/wish/208244599</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
