Slideshow by Visola Adilova

Korematsu VS. United States - 1944

vadilova — 2023-12-15 17:10:52 UTC

After the attack on pearl harbor, the government said that all Japanese people have to go to interment camps because they worried the Japanese where spies or dangerous. Korematsu refused to go to a Japanese internment camp. he said that his 5th amendment right of due process was violated.

The supreme court decided that the United States being at war outweighed his right to due process.

This case is a negative example of the Founding Ideal Rights because even in a time of war, Korematsu should not have his right violated

Olmstead VS. United States - 1928

vadilova — 2023-12-15 17:10:59 UTC

In 1928, federal agents suspected that a man named Roy Olmsted was running an illegal liquor business. With out a judicial warrant, the agents installed wiretaps on the phone lines leading to the office and home of Olmsted. Agents were able to listen to the phone conversation and gather evidence that he was guilty.

This court case connects to the 4th amendment.

In a vote 5-4 the court decided that the wiretaps had not broke Olmsted's 4th amendment right.

This case in a negative example of the founding ideal rights because the agents listened to all the conversations going on in Olmsted's home.

Snyder V. Phelps - 2011

vadilova — 2023-12-15 17:11:03 UTC

The family of a deceased marine, Matthew A Snyder, files a lawsuit against the members of the Westboro Baptist church after they picketed Snyder's funeral. They accused the churches founders of defamation for invasion of privacy and the intentional infliction of emotional distress for displaying signs that had disrespectful sayings on them.

This court case connects to the 1st amendment

The court decision was 8-1, and they said that the speeches' and protests were protected by the 1st amendment right.

Tinker V. Des Moines - 1965

vadilova — 2023-12-15 17:11:09 UTC

In 1965, students in Des Moines started to wear black armbands in support of the truce in the Vietnam war. Their school made a policy that if you wear them, you would be asked to remove them and if you refused, it would end up in a student being suspended. 2 students wore them to school and they both got suspended. The parents sued the school for breaking the student 1st amendment right.

This court case connects to the 1st amendment

The court decided that the students did not lose their 1st amendment right.

Mahanoy Area High School v B.L. - 2021

vadilova — 2023-12-15 17:11:13 UTC

B.L, a student in Mahanoy high school, made the cheerleading team, but not the rank she wanted. So after a long week of school, B.L posted a snap on her public story that said "F*** school f*** cheer". After she posted the snap a lot of girls from the cheerleading team saw this and reported it to the school. The school took action by kicking out B.L from her cheerleading team. Her parents sued the school after this happened.

This court case connects to the 1st amendment

The court said that the school suspending her went against B.L's first amendment right.

Bethel School V. Fraser - 1983

vadilova — 2023-12-15 17:11:16 UTC

In 1983, a student attending Bethel High School, Matthew Fraser, gave a speech for a class mate that was graduating. The speech was in an assembly with more than 600 people. In the speech Fraser said numerous sexual references. Before the speech, his teacher told him that if he said the speech, he would face consequences. After the speech the assistant principle told him that he broke school policy and is suspended for 3 days. They also told him that his name would be removed from the list of graduates that would be graduating that year.

This court case connects to the 1st amendment

The court ruled that the school did not violate Frasers first amendment right, and that the school do not have to tolerate lewd and obscene speech.

Mapp V. Ohio - 1961

vadilova — 2023-12-15 17:11:19 UTC

One day in Cleveland, Ohio police officers barged into Dollree Mapp's house without a search warrant, claiming she was a suspected bomber. In stead of what they were looking for, they found a trunk full of obscene pictures in her basement. She was arrested. She argued that her 4th amendment rights were broken and violated by the search.

This court case connects to the 4th amendment

The U.S supreme e court ruled in favor of Mapp. they said that the evidence was seized unlawfully and without a search warrant. this evidence cannot be used in criminal prosecutions.

This case is a positive example of the founding fathers rights because Mapp's rights were defended.

New Jersey V. TLO - 1985

vadilova — 2023-12-15 17:11:24 UTC

T.L.O was a 14 year old student at a NJ high school. She and another student were caught smoking cigarettes in the restroom. They were questioned by the school administrator. T.L.O denied the allegations. The administrator searched T.L.Os purse and found cigarettes, marijuana, a wad of cash, and a list of people who owed her money.

This case connects to the 4th amendment

The court concluded that the search of T.L.OS purse did not violate the 4th amendment.

Miranda V. Arizona - 1963

vadilova — 2023-12-15 17:11:27 UTC

On March 13th ,1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested in his house and brought to the police station for kidnapping and r***. After 2 hours after the interrogation the police got a written confession from Miranda. The jury found Miranda guilty.

This court case connects to the 5th amendment

The court said that the defendants interrogation violated Miranda's Fifth Amendment right.

Furman V. Georgia - 1969

vadilova — 2023-12-15 17:11:32 UTC

In 1969 William Furman was convicted of murder. Furman said that the penalty was unconstitutional discriminatory. This case was eventually combined with two other cases.

This court case connects to the 8th amendment

The court said that the penalty was unconstitutional and discriminatory.

Gregg V. Georgia - 1976

vadilova — 2023-12-15 17:11:34 UTC

On December 11th, 1976, Troy Leone Gregg was convicted of the murder of two people and was sentenced to death. Greg's Council decided that the penalty was unconstitutional and broke the 8th Amendment and 14th Amendment right, and was cruel and unusual.

This court case connects to the 8th and 14th amendment

The court disagreed and said that the death penalty was not cruel or unusual.

Ingraham V. Wright - 1920

vadilova — 2023-12-15 17:11:38 UTC

In 1920, James Ingraham was an 8th grade student who was given a punishment for not answering the teachers question fast enough. He was hit multiple times by the principle.

The court said the school should not have the power to overrule the school policy.

This case is a negative example of the Founding Ideal Rights because even if Ingraham didn't answer the teacher on time it does not mean that he has to be hit multiple times and get in trouble.

Vernonia V. Acton - 1995

vadilova — 2023-12-15 17:11:40 UTC

In a school investigation, High school administrators found that some athletes use drugs in their system to play better in sports. The school made a new drug testing policy which allowed random drug testing of the student-athletes. James Acton, a student was not allowed to participate in his schools football program, when his parents refused to consent to the drug testing.

The court said that the school could not intrude the student-athletes privacy.

Hazelwood School District V. Kuhlmeier - 1988

vadilova — 2023-12-15 17:11:44 UTC

IN a school sponsored newspaper at Hazelwood East Highschool , was written and edited by students. One day in May 1983, the principle received 2 pages of the newspaper that talks about "inappropriate topics'. One of the pages was talking about divorce and the other a teen pregnancy. He said that the newspaper should end. Cathy Kuhlmeier and 2 former students brought the case to court.

This court case connects to the 1st amendment

The court said that the school administers could exercise restraint of school-sponsored expression.

Engel V.S Vitale - 1962

vadilova — 2023-12-21 16:49:02 UTC

The New York State Board of Regents had students recite a small prayer at the start of each school day. A group of organizations joined forces in challenging the prayer, claiming that it violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

This court case connects to the 1st amendment

The court said that the state cannot hold prayers in public schools, even if participation is not required and the prayer is not tied to a particular religion.