The original message of the news mentions that a rumor has spread about the possible planning of the tragic sinking of the titanic in 1912 to assassinate the financial opponents of JP Morgan.

 

The Snopes page has determined that the information is false and the meme for which the rumor was spread is a conspiracy that seeks to harm the audience.

Nothing in the news is true, only a conspiracy was created using what happened in the tragedy.

This article is classified as disinformation because information about the tragic accident of the titanic was manipulated and that is why all the content created as the meme and the accusations against JP morgan are false.

The target audience to which the rumor is directed is towards the people who had a relationship with the victims and towards those who have a connection with the financial world, as well as the public interested in what happened to the most luxurious ship of the time.


 | 6. Where was this news originally published? Is it a reputable and trustworthy site? 

The news was originally published on facebook but was analyzed in snopes later. Snopes is an internationally renowned website that is responsible for analyzing news information and classifying it into categories such as true, false, doubtful and impossible to verify.

 | 7. How would you classify this news story (misinformation / disinformation / malinformation / cherry-picking / overgeneralization)?  

This news is classified as misinformation.  

 | 8. What is the possible motivation (purpose) behind this message (financial / political / social / psychological)? Why do you think so?  

The possible motivation behind this message is to unjustifiably blame a public figure such as JP Morgan, who was a famous banker with great wealth, who always took care of the reputation of his bank. Therefore, with the message they wanted to attack the financial and political sector after the accusation of planning the sinking of the Titanic.

 | 9. Who is the intended audience of this message (Whom does the author want to persuade or influence with this message? Who will likely share it online?)  

The target audience is readers who are unaware of the true facts of the sinking of the Titanic, which was an accident after colliding with an iceberg.

 | 10. If people believe the false parts of this story, what consequences do you think that might have (financial / political / social / psychological)? Why?  

If people believe this news, they will consequently hate the banker JP Morgan, his bank and everything related to him, for his macabre plan that killed 1,500 people after the Titanic sank.  

R/ Partially True  

3.  What part of the story is true? 

R/ It is true that there are studies that have demonstrated the possibility of bringing and generating artificial water to communities that have problems in obtaining water, which in the long term would not only be beneficial for the populations that lack this resource, but could also be a means to fight global warming

4. What part of the story is false? 

R/ It has'nt yet been studied in depth how chage the water cycle, introducing artificial rainfall and so on, could lead to a destabilization of the earth's temperature and the way the earth regulates itself.

5. Who is the target of this piece of news (who is the news about)? 

R/The news focuses on reporting on a community in Arizona, USA, where it did not rain for up to five months and how scientists found a solution to bring water to this community. The target is probably scientists and people looking into the fight against climate change. 
 
6. Where was this news originally published? Is it a reputable and trustworthy site? 

R/ Report of a group of scientists

7. How would you classify this news story (misinformation / disinformation / Mal information / cherry-picking / overgeneralization)? 

R/overgeneralizacion 

8. What is the possible motivation (purpose) behind this message (financial / political / social / psychological)? Why do you think so? 

R/ The message that hides the reortage is that it gives a false hope to the people of being able to have water whenever they want it, just asking scientists to generate rain. However, this encourages us to continue the practices that left these areas of the planet without water in the first place, which is neither ethical nor responsible

9. Who is the intended audience of this message (Whom does the author want to persuade or influence with this message? Who will likely share it online?) 

R/ Politicians could take advantage of this discovery to manipulate people into office, and businessmen could profit from this idea and take control of water

10. If people believe the false parts of this story, what consequences do you think that might have (financial / political / social / psychological)? Why? 

 R/ Ecological

10. If people believe the false parts of this story, what consequences do you think that might have (financial / political / social / psychological)? Why?
Mainly people are going to be more afraid of going out for fear of the insecurity.

·      The news is that Disney filed a patent for a jumping roller coaster. However, this headline originated from a website that publishes satirical content about Disney theme parks.

 2. How does Snopes/La Silla Vacia/Full Fact rate this news story? (If you chose an article from another source, how would you rate it?)

·      The article is from snopes.com and is classified as originating as satire. Additionally, I think it is a dis-information article.

 

 3. What part of the story is true? 

·      Where it says that the information came from a satirical article (The Mouse Trap) and that the news is not real.

·      Where it is claimed that Disney filed a patent for a roller coaster that jumps off the track for a few seconds. Well, this really came from a satire page and not from Disney.

 5. Who is the target of this piece of news (who is the news about)? 

 

The target is Disney, but it is aimed primarily at Disney users.
 

 

·      It originated from The Mouse Trap, a satirical website, so it could be said that it is not a reliable website, or where complete or unbiased information can be found.
 

 7. How would you classify this news story (misinformation / disinformation / mal-information / cherry-picking / overgeneralization)? 

·      I could classify this news as dis-information, since it does not contain real content and additionally, it generates affectations through mockery and manipulation of information towards Disney.
 

 8. What is the possible motivation (purpose) behind this message (financial / political / social / psychological)? Why do you think so? 

·      I think that behind this there is a bad intention in the story, which affects the name of Disney, since in this way ridicule and, in some way, criticism and mockery of Disney were generated.

 9. Who is the intended audience of this message (Whom does the author want to persuade or influence with this message? Who will likely share it online?) 

·     The intended audience of this message was anyone at the time interested in details about the new Disney roller coaster and they were likely to share it with others.

 
If people had believed the story, they would possibly have believed that it is possible for a roller coaster to be in the air without touching the rail for a few seconds, which is currently impossible since it depends on many variables including weight, which is something that They cannot control, because it depends on the passengers.

Perhaps its consequences would be psychological for the user, so that they would generate insecurities in the face of the new Disney attractions, which in turn would bring economic consequences for Disney.