https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w en-us 2018-09-10 11:35:43 UTC 2018-09-10 19:40:43 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279585211 1.  Not absolutism: This is because it is about before they were crowned. Most absolutism is about people making laws which this is not of.
2. Absolutism: Yes, this is absolutism because this is about the Chinese laws and who and how they are making them. It's also about the rulers and their powers. 
3.  Yes, because its about their family having state issues and the laws of that. 
Yes, because its about his complete control that he has in the state. ]]> 2018-09-10 19:15:11 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279585211 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279585712 1. No, I do not think this is an example of absolutism because both King and Queen were not selected by God. Also, it uses the word "required" so they had to follow other orders not make their own. 
2. Yes, this would be an example because the emperors were chosen by Heaven, and there could only be one to direct the military, etc.
3. No, because they are chosen by royal family members, and there is also a Council of Ministers to make decisions as well.
4. Yes, I think it is absolutism because  he eliminated all restraints on his power, and he eventually dictated Italy entirely. Also, it never said whether he was chosen by God or not. ]]> 2018-09-10 19:16:38 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279585712 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279585883 1: No: they worked with a Parliament.
2: Yes: the law said that the position could not be challenged by anyone.
3: Kind of: The king makes state decisions with a council, but can dismiss members when ever he pleases and there are no elections for the members.
4: Yes:]]> 2018-09-10 19:17:11 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279585883 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279585886 1. No, this is not an example of Absolutism because they all laws had to be passed by Parliament.
2. Yes, it talks about heaven being a big part of the monarchy.
3. No because monarchs aren't chosen by God. While other parts of the monarchy sound like they might have some sort of relation to absolutism because the monarchs are chosen by other people, it is not.
4.  Yes- but to an extreme. ]]> 2018-09-10 19:17:11 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279585886 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279586089 Example 1: It is not absolutism because the monarchs must work with parliament.
Example 2:  It is not absolutism because the Emperor is said to be a God, not chosen by one.
Example 3: It is not absolutism because the monarch is chosen by the royal family and must work with parliament.
Example 4: This is absolutism because he eliminated parliament, restraints on his power, and political parties. He also had complete control of the military and manipulated his subjects.]]> 2018-09-10 19:17:56 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279586089 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279586126 1. I think the first example is not Absolutism because Parliament is a vast part of their ruling.
2. I think the second example is Absolutism because the emperor was chosen from Heaven and the governors were hand-picked by the emperor.
3. I think the third example is not Absolutism because The Council of Ministers is a large part of the state.
4. I think the fourth example]]> 2018-09-10 19:18:02 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279586126 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279586346 1. No, this is not absolutism because there were rules in place requiring cooperation and communication between the monarchs and parliament, as well as more evenly dispersed responsibilities throughout the government.
2. Yes, absolutism is in place in this rulership. There is a single leader who is said to have been a "Son of Heaven." Additionally, the monarch had sole control over the other people in the government and their responsibilities. 
3.  Yes, this is absolutism because while the monarchs choose to have multiple parties in place for support and consultation, they still have the power to dissolve those parties or dismiss their members. 
4. Yes, this is an example of absolutism because the monarch had complete and total power which was enforced on ]]> 2018-09-10 19:18:35 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279586346 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279586377 1. No, it's not absolutism because the monarchs have to work with the parliament.
2. Yes because the emperor has all the power.
3. No because the monarch works with the Council of Ministers.
4. Yes because the prime minister had all the power.]]> 2018-09-10 19:18:37 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279586377 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279586458 1. It is not absolutism because King William and Queen Mary worked with the parliaments; the parliaments were not weakened.
2. It is absolutism because the Chinese emperor were believed to be sent from Heaven; which is an example of absolutism.
3. It is not absolutism because King Abdullah worked along side with the Council of Ministries, instead of weakening them.
4.  ]]> 2018-09-10 19:18:44 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279586458 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279586570 1. No. King William and Queen Mary worked alongside the parliament. Therefore, they did not have absolute power.
2. Yes. The Chinese emperors were though to be sent from heaven and there could only be one at a time. It was believed that they could not be challenged.
3. I think this is Absolutism because the king always has the final say. It is similar to the "new nobles" situation]]> 2018-09-10 19:19:01 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279586570 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279586590 1. This is not an example of absolutism because the monarchs have all the power so they shouldn't have to be required to call on Parliament. 
2. Yes because the emperor is the ruler and has all the power and he was chosen from heaven because, the Chinese people referred to their emperor as Son of Heaven 
3. No because the King should have all the power and he doesn't ]]> 2018-09-10 19:19:05 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279586590 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279586618 1. This is not an example because he agreed to meet with the parliament
2. Yes because they believed that there was one god therefor there should be one ruler
3. No because the king shares his power
4. Yes because the eking had complete control.]]> 2018-09-10 19:19:10 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279586618 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279586676 1. This example is not a true example because it shows that the people did not see King William and Queen Mary  as people with absolute power.
2. This is an example of absolutism because the Chinese saw their emperors as Sons of Heaven, and they were able to hand pick governors, and officials.
3.I wouldn't exactly say that this an example of absolutism. It is more that the monarchs were given power by both the royal family, and legal scholars. Any ways they weren't in control of everything.]]> 2018-09-10 19:19:18 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279586676 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279586690 1.  No, it is isn't absolutism because the monarchs work with a parliament. 
2. Yes, the Chinese emperor has total control: absolutism.
3. No, the monarchy shares its power with the government.
4. Yes, he had complete and total control over Italy.
 ]]> 2018-09-10 19:19:20 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279586690 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279586946 1. No, because it says that he thought he was chosen by God but never clearly states that him and the Queen were chosen by God. 
2. Yes, this is absolutism because they thought of their emperors as the sons from heaven.
3.  This isn't an example of absolutism because the King isn't the only person with power.
4. This is absolutism because the King has control over everything]]> 2018-09-10 19:19:42 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279586946 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279587149 1. No, I think this is not an example of Absolutism because the King and Queen werent chosen by God which is required. ]]> 2018-09-10 19:19:54 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279587149 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279587676 1. No, this is not an example of absolutism because the king and queen were obligated to meet with the parliament and discuss how to govern the country. They were also not in charge of taxing the people.  
2.]]> 2018-09-10 19:20:34 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279587676 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279589158 2. Yes, because the chinese emporer is in control]]> 2018-09-10 19:23:34 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279589158 https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279589591 3. No because the king isnt the only one in control]]> 2018-09-10 19:24:52 UTC https://padlet.com/phiort1_1/b1i6wnqnpi0w/wish/279589591