Mi padlet estiloso by Mario Arias Lora https://padlet.com/marioarias2/b09j3kpkxu93vpji Hecho con una sensibilidad a flor de piel en-us 2022-01-19 08:16:40 UTC 2022-04-20 07:25:26 UTC hello@padlet.com Resucitar el mamut: ¿Puede hacerse? ¿Debe hacerse? marioarias2 https://padlet.com/marioarias2/b09j3kpkxu93vpji/wish/1999970919 Main idea:
Reviving mammoths to fight global warming.

Arguments/facts:
Crossing the DNA of an Asian elephant with a woolly mammoth with the goal of bringing the mammoth back to life and sending it to the arctic tundra.

Dialog:
If what they are saying is right, I think that is a very good idea because global warming is the most important problem that we have with the world. Only we need to be sure that this process is the right one. Finally, be sure that these animals can't bring any type of virus or disease.

Summary:
George Church, an American genetic engineering star, wants to bring mammoths back to fight global warming.
George Church, an American genetic engineering star, wants to bring mammoths back to fight global warming. The idea that mammoths could help save permafrost dates back some 20 years.

APA:
Sébastian Seibt, 16/09/2021, ¿Revivir al mamut para luchar contra el calentamiento global?, Retrieved form: https://www.france24.com/es/medio-ambiente/20210916-revivir-mamut-combate-calentamiento-global-permafrost


]]> 2022-01-19 09:34:21 UTC https://padlet.com/marioarias2/b09j3kpkxu93vpji/wish/1999970919 The Mammoth De-extintion jordiarnal https://padlet.com/marioarias2/b09j3kpkxu93vpji/wish/1999972174 Main idea:
Bring back the mammoth or other mamals. And benefits of bringing them back.
Arguments/facts:
- To decelerate melting in the artics
- To prevent the emission of greenhouse gases trapped within the permafrost layer - up to 600 million tons of net carbon annually.
- To understand the dominant traits among cold-resistant genomes.
- To save modern elephants from extinction.

Dialog:
I think reviving them is a good idea because they can help the climate change decelerate. Also we could have new wool: better, more resistant, etc... So then we could stop exploiting as much as we do know sheeps or other animals that give us wool.

Summary:
Reviving the woolly mammoth is a good thing, becuase they could decelerate climate change and a lot more. Also reviving them wouldn't be the only one, so if we revive the wolly mammoth we could revive other extincted animals.
APA:
Maven Creative. (n.d.). May Prehistory Thunder Forward: the Resurrection of the Woolly Mammoth. Woolly Mammoth De-Extinction Project & Process | Colossal. Retrieved January 26, 2022, from https://colossal.com/mammoth/]]> 2022-01-19 09:35:02 UTC https://padlet.com/marioarias2/b09j3kpkxu93vpji/wish/1999972174 General information marioarias2 https://padlet.com/marioarias2/b09j3kpkxu93vpji/wish/1999972602 2022-01-19 09:35:16 UTC https://padlet.com/marioarias2/b09j3kpkxu93vpji/wish/1999972602 Opinions in favour marioarias2 https://padlet.com/marioarias2/b09j3kpkxu93vpji/wish/1999973261 2022-01-19 09:35:39 UTC https://padlet.com/marioarias2/b09j3kpkxu93vpji/wish/1999973261 General information marioarias2 https://padlet.com/marioarias2/b09j3kpkxu93vpji/wish/1999977074 2022-01-19 09:37:10 UTC https://padlet.com/marioarias2/b09j3kpkxu93vpji/wish/1999977074 ¿Deberíamos resucitar especies extinguidas? marioarias2 https://padlet.com/marioarias2/b09j3kpkxu93vpji/wish/1999979831 Main idea:
How can we revive animals that are not used to today's conditions?

Argument/facts:
Researchers have successfully encoded the genome of the Tasmanian tiger. And they plan to try to revive many more animals.

Dialog:
People can have a lot of opinions about this subject. People can think that is a very good idea to revive animals for our own benefit. Also, people can think that reviving animals can save our planet, for example, climate change, global warming, etc.

Summary:
On this website, the scientists have announced a breakthrough in the battle to save the northern white rhino, which is on the verge of exemption. Cutting-edge reproductive and stem cell technology has produced embryos from frozen sperm from the northern white rhino and eggs from the closely related southern white rhino. 
Finally, he says that being able to revive some animals in order to save the world is a good idea. But we always have to know what we are doing and why we would be doing it.

APA Style:
Ruby Russell, 06.07.2018, ¿Deberíamos resucitar especies extinguidas?  Retrieved from: https://www.dw.com/es/deber%C3%ADamos-resucitar-especies-extinguidas/a-44561557
]]> 2022-01-19 09:38:38 UTC https://padlet.com/marioarias2/b09j3kpkxu93vpji/wish/1999979831 Opinion in opposing nachoma07 https://padlet.com/marioarias2/b09j3kpkxu93vpji/wish/2012992514 2022-01-26 08:13:36 UTC https://padlet.com/marioarias2/b09j3kpkxu93vpji/wish/2012992514 13 Biggest Pros of De-Extinction jordiarnal https://padlet.com/marioarias2/b09j3kpkxu93vpji/wish/2013007575 Main idea:
6 pros of de-exctintion (benefits)
Arguments/facts:
- There could be environmental benefits to consider with de-extinction.
- It provides a unique opportunity to experience the past.
-It gives us the foundation for more technological advances.
-The information generated from de-extinction would help us preserve more species.

Dialog:
So basically the just say things about global warming and all that but I don't get how they are going to benefit us. Since some animals create CO2, so maybe the predictions are wrong and they will also create CO2 with their gases.

Summary:
There are several environmental and social benefits to consider with this process. It also provides a unique opportunity to experience the past through the eyes of those who were alive at the time. The 100-year Starship Program encourages the development of new technologies and processes that would make such a journey possible. We could experience the same advantage when working toward the restoration of species through de-extinction. The techniques that we use to bring back extinct animals can apply to our threatened and endangered species.
APA:
Editor in Chief. (2019, September 20). 13 Biggest Pros and Cons of De-Extinction. ConnectUS. Retrieved February 1, 2022, from https://connectusfund.org/13-biggest-pros-and-cons-of-de-extinction]]> 2022-01-26 08:23:01 UTC https://padlet.com/marioarias2/b09j3kpkxu93vpji/wish/2013007575 13 Biggest Cons of De-Extinction jordiarnal https://padlet.com/marioarias2/b09j3kpkxu93vpji/wish/2013007929 Main idea:
6 Cons of de-extinction

Arguments/facts:
- We would exploit somethings for achieving de-extinction.
- There is the threat of new disease with de-extinction.
- It may not change biomes or environments for the better
- This work could change scientific priorities in other fields
- De-extinction could cause even more species to go extinct
- It would force the new animals to live in captivity, for them to be save

Dialog:
We all think that they would fascinating and all, and I don't disagree. But maybe other animal would no accept their greatings and find them like a threat. Also if extinct animal died or from viruses, are we not going to de-extinct them also.

Summary:
De-extinction is the process of bringing back species that have gone extinct, or at least some of them, to our planet. Critics argue that it could cause even more harm to animals and the planet if we are exploiting them for purposes that are solely ours. We have no way of knowing if there would be human contagions associated with some of the creatures, especially if they come from the ancient world.

If we can restore an extinct species to its usual environment, then there is the potential to maintain homeostasis there. When there are several hundred years that have passed before the de-extinction process occurs, then the results could be very different. The returning species would be potentially alien to the environment because of the natural evolutionary process. Some might even act as an invasive species.

APA:
Editor in Chief. (2019, September 20). 13 Biggest Pros and Cons of De-Extinction. ConnectUS. Retrieved February 1, 2022, from https://connectusfund.org/13-biggest-pros-and-cons-of-de-extinction]]> 2022-01-26 08:23:15 UTC https://padlet.com/marioarias2/b09j3kpkxu93vpji/wish/2013007929 Biology Wise nachoma07 https://padlet.com/marioarias2/b09j3kpkxu93vpji/wish/2023494718 Main idea:
Lack of knowledge

Arguments/facts:
- We will not probably have all the needs that de-extinct animals aquire
- We don't know the reaction of their new home, it could be agressive
- Returning to live extinct viruses

Dialog:
We think that we could sustain de-extict animals, but we are not even 25% prepared of what could come, because of lack of de-extinct behaviour knowladge

Summary:
Man-animal conflict will only become worse as more species are brought back from extinction. We might also bring back the viruses and pathogens that had become extinct with them. This will put tremendous pressure on extant species as well as the ecosystem as a whole. It's difficult to guess how these species will be able to adapt to the environment. There is no point in bringing species back from extinction if we cannot guarantee their safety.

Millions of animals are already falling prey to animal testing every year. The huge amount of money that we are spending on de-extinction could be used to save species which are on the verge of extinction.

APA:
M. (2015, 20 febrero). Pros and Cons of De-extinction. Biology Wise. Recuperado 1 de febrero de 2022, de https://biologywise.com/pros-cons-of-de-extinction]]> 2022-02-01 14:55:07 UTC https://padlet.com/marioarias2/b09j3kpkxu93vpji/wish/2023494718