Ethics (12 Named Studies) by Christina Torres

Group 5

2024-02-20 18:44:24 UTC

Zachary Miller, Jovany Garcia, and Christopher Galindo

GROUP 8:

2024-02-20 18:44:49 UTC

Camile V

Kaleigh B

Victor M

Group 6

2024-02-20 18:44:59 UTC

Damaris

Serenity

Group 5

2024-02-20 18:45:09 UTC

Holzel - et - al

Group 6

2024-02-20 18:45:39 UTC

Hassett (monkey toy preferences)

Group 5

2024-02-20 18:45:40 UTC

Overall ethical

GROUP 8:

2024-02-20 18:45:43 UTC

Saavedra and silverman ("button boy"

Group 6

2024-02-20 18:46:01 UTC

Overall ethical

GROUP 8:

2024-02-20 18:46:15 UTC

Overall ethical

Group 4

2024-02-20 18:46:29 UTC

Alexa, Nancyly, Maylet

Group 9

2024-02-20 18:46:31 UTC

Victoria Ratner, Kailani Tilley, Melanie Reyes

Group 1

2024-02-20 18:46:46 UTC

Milgram (obedience)

Group 1

2024-02-20 18:46:55 UTC

Dylan F

Mariana A

Jordany R

Group 5

2024-02-20 18:47:04 UTC

No ethical guidelines broken.

Group 9

2024-02-20 18:47:10 UTC

Fagen (elephant learning)

Group 4

2024-02-20 18:47:13 UTC

Dement & Kleitman (SLEEPING & DREAMING)

Group 8

2024-02-20 18:47:26 UTC

There were no guidelines broken in this study.

Group 1

2024-02-20 18:47:42 UTC

Overall unethical

Group 3

2024-02-20 18:48:02 UTC

Jada H, Rehana L, and Shanna

Group 9

2024-02-20 18:48:31 UTC

Overall ethical

Group 3

2024-02-20 18:48:49 UTC

Perry et al. (personal space)

Group 1

2024-02-20 18:49:06 UTC

Milgram broke Informed Consent because the Ps were not fully informed about the truth of the procedure. He broke Right to Withdraw since the prods used kept the Ps from leaving the study when they wanted to, and he broke their Protection From Harm as the Ps felt stressed and some had seizures.

Group 3

2024-02-20 18:49:12 UTC

Overall Ethical

Group 9

2024-02-20 18:49:15 UTC

No ethical guidelines broken

group 2

2024-02-20 18:49:44 UTC

Sanaa Harris,Aundrea NeSmith, Ivory Longshore

Group 2

2024-02-20 18:50:48 UTC

Piliavin (subway samaritans)

Group 5

2024-02-20 18:50:52 UTC

Informed consent - All participants had written informed consent

Right to withdraw - Two participants left because they felt discomfort from the scanner.

Protection From Harm - Confirmed that no Ps had metal implants, none had claustrophobia, and Ps on the waitlist were given the training after the study was over.

Group 2

2024-02-20 18:51:34 UTC

overall unethical

Group 4

2024-02-20 18:52:02 UTC

Overall ethical

Group 2

2024-02-20 18:52:47 UTC

Protection from harm

confidentiality

Group 9

2024-02-20 18:52:50 UTC

Fagen followed most guidelines including rewarding, housing, and keeping their numbers low. The elephants were rewarded after tasks, they were housed together and there was only 5 elephants in the study.

Group 6

2024-02-20 18:52:51 UTC

Followed guidelines of NIH for care and use of lab animals
They were housed with their social groups
Had constant access to water and nutritional food
They were familiar with the keeper entering their enclosure so no undue stress
They were overseen by the university of Emry animal care committee

Group 6

2024-02-20 18:52:53 UTC

The guideline that was broken was numbers there was a lot of monkeys in this study.

Group 3

2024-02-20 18:53:08 UTC

Perry deceived the participants by using a placebo and lying to them. It also caused undue harm because it caused stress.

Group 2

2024-02-20 18:53:39 UTC

no informed consent

deception

no debriefing after event

Group 1

2024-02-20 18:53:43 UTC

Deception- reduced demand characteristics

Debriefing- told about the deception and checked up on them 6 months after to make sure there was no psych issues

confidentiality-None of the participants personal information was shared to the public

Group 8:

2024-02-20 18:54:36 UTC

All the ethics were followed

Informed Consent: The boy and the mom both gave consent.

Right To Withdraw: The boy could have left or not show up to the facility.

Confidentiality: The boy had a fake name "Button Boy".

Protection From Harm: He could have stopped touching the button at any time.

Debriefing: The Button Boy was checked at the end of the study, 6 months later, and 12th months later.

Group 3

2024-02-20 18:56:16 UTC

High internal validity, infer causation, double-blind procedure, repeated measures design, and counterbalancing.

Group 4

2024-02-20 18:59:14 UTC

Informed Consent - Implied as Ps had to be informed of the procedure and what the researchers were doing to them during the study.

Confidential - Names of the Ps were not released.

Withdraw - Ps had the right to withdraw at anytime as they had to drive to the laboratory.

Group 4

2024-02-20 18:59:44 UTC

Dement & Kleitman broke protection from harm as the participants felt tired and stressed from being woken up in the middle of the night.