Please provide your answers by Usic https://padlet.com/usictech/aqa0ulgfqfyx2zwe According to authors such as Kenichi Ohmae, what are the main reasons behind the demise of the Nation-State? How did technological innovations contribute to it? Would you consider authors like Kenichi Ohmae and Susan Strange to be Globalist, Internationalist or Transformationalist? Explain your answer. According to the author of the article, Alasdair Roberts, has the nation-state been under threat before? Could you provide examples from the text? How have states responded to challenges posed by the Internet according to Roberts? Is Alasdair Roberts a Globalist, an Internationalist or a Transformationalist? Explain your answer. Is the Nation-State dying or ‘alive and well? Which position do you find more convincing? Explain your answer en-us 2022-02-24 12:42:05 UTC 2022-02-24 13:36:06 UTC hello@padlet.com Group 2 kcao42 https://padlet.com/usictech/aqa0ulgfqfyx2zwe/wish/2064519003 1.The main culprit was alleged to be economic globalization.
2. there was handwringing about deindustrialization as container ships queued outside booming Asian seaports. International financiers were strutting in New York and London.The world was beginning to rewire itself with scant regard for national borders.
3. “Nation states, have already lost their role as meaningful units of participation in the global economy of today’s borderless world
4. may be the last to recognize that they and their ministers have lost the authority over national societies and economies that they used to have
5. the advent of railroads and the invention of the long-range nuclear bomber.
6. Internationalists 
7. alive. As the reality is that the influence of the state over daily life is more extensive than ever, with good consequences as well as bad. Certainly, nation-states are susceptible to influence from other centers of power, as they always have been. But this does not mean that the autonomy of the state has collapsed.]]> 2022-02-24 13:13:30 UTC https://padlet.com/usictech/aqa0ulgfqfyx2zwe/wish/2064519003 group 1 https://padlet.com/usictech/aqa0ulgfqfyx2zwe/wish/2064523760 1: The reason is economic globalization
2: 
  • Most households now had access to cable television, while newscasters had access to improved satellite technology.
  • type quicker and spend time 
  • predicted that it would undermine the autonomy of foreign ministries and military commanders

3: Pessimistic globalists 

4.Yes, The Internet might have threatened national sovereignty, but so did the advent of railroads and the invention of the long-range nuclear bomber.

 5. Governments are responding by developing sophisticated new methods of "insider threat detection" to prevent information leaks from the Internet.

6：Internationalist

7：  Alive. The reality is that the influence of the state over daily life is more extensive than ever, with good consequences as well as bad. Certainly, nation-states are susceptible to influence from other centers of power, as they always have been. But this does not mean that the autonomy of the state has collapsed 
]]> 2022-02-24 13:16:51 UTC https://padlet.com/usictech/aqa0ulgfqfyx2zwe/wish/2064523760 Group 3 CaoYuting https://padlet.com/usictech/aqa0ulgfqfyx2zwe/wish/2064539205 1. economic globalization, technological changes, and shift in geopolitics.

2. most households now had access to cable television, newscasters had access to improved satellite technology; the result was pervasive, real-time coverage of events around the world.

3. Kenichi Ohmae is a negative globalist because the nation does not want to lose its role and meaning. Susan Strange is an internationalist because she said the world market is better than the nation's.

4. yes, such as the Internet, the advent of railroads, and the invention of the long-range nuclear bomber

5. But governments responded by developing sophisticated
new methods of “insider threat detection” to prevent further leaks. there are other ways in which nation-states have asserted themselves

6. internationalist because this does not
mean that the autonomy of the state has collapsed.

7. alive, because the reality is that the influence of the state over daily life is more
extensive than ever, with good results as well as bad.


]]> 2022-02-24 13:26:21 UTC https://padlet.com/usictech/aqa0ulgfqfyx2zwe/wish/2064539205