<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Assignment One by mickenzi crowells</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/mickenzicrowellssss/alkpr6mwxegaxn08</link>
      <description>Made by Mickenzi Crowells </description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2023-10-06 23:19:34 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2023-10-13 03:01:40 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Red Flag #1 - Confirmation Bias </title>
         <author>mickenzicrowellssss</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mickenzicrowellssss/alkpr6mwxegaxn08/wish/2736165220</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><em>Definition:&nbsp;</em></div><blockquote>The red flag "confirmation bias" involves a persons experiences and values, and how that can influence what they believe to be true. An individuals perception of information can be effected by confirmation bias.&nbsp;</blockquote><div><br><em>connection: </em><br>I thought this specific example was interesting because it demonstrates how anyone can display <strong>confirmation bias i</strong>n some way. The author of the article is a doctor, which some would say it is unusual for a doctor to believe in paranormal activity. It is an example of confirmation bias because she believes it is a fact that the dead are trying to communicate with their living loved ones. She unfortunately lost her son, and she&nbsp; describes an encounter she had with his spirit after he died. She experienced a huge degree of trauma, which enables her confirmation bias in the article, which is clear, if you believe what she is saying or you're <mark>skeptical. Her sons passing is an example of a </mark><strong><mark>barrier to critical thinking.&nbsp;</mark></strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.mindbodygreen.com/articles/suggestions-for-communicating-with-the-dead" />
         <pubDate>2023-10-06 23:46:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mickenzicrowellssss/alkpr6mwxegaxn08/wish/2736165220</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Pseudoscience Watchlist #1 - Convinces by Faith or Belief </title>
         <author>mickenzicrowellssss</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mickenzicrowellssss/alkpr6mwxegaxn08/wish/2738877933</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><em>Definition:</em></div><div>The pseudoscience watchlist includes seven attributes. Many times, they overlap. In this post I want to focus on "convinces through faith or belief". This is when an organization or person uses religious leverage or another beliefs in order to push their own narrative or idea of the truth.&nbsp;<br><br></div><div><em>connection</em><br>the story above is tells her personal account of having an exorcism practiced on her by older members of her religious community. She was a young woman who was new to a missionary community and although she grew up religious it was not quite like the one she found herself in at that time. She revealed to some members that she had never witnessed a miracle or heard God speaking to her, and they immediately insisted she needed to be exorcised. It was casually suggested but they were being completely serious. It was during the ceremony that the author began to feel <mark>skeptica</mark>l, she described it as "a piece of her faith had dislodged" that night.&nbsp; <mark>Exorcisms are a Pseudoscience and in this case, all of the people practicing it were trying to use a young woman faith to gain more control and power over her,</mark> as well to express the fact that she needed to behave and believe in certain things or she would be outcast from the group.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.shondaland.com/live/family/a45251639/i-survived-a-real-life-exorcism/" />
         <pubDate>2023-10-09 23:33:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mickenzicrowellssss/alkpr6mwxegaxn08/wish/2738877933</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Red Flag #2 - All Natural </title>
         <author>mickenzicrowellssss</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mickenzicrowellssss/alkpr6mwxegaxn08/wish/2740433919</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><em>Definition: </em><br>The red flag "all natural" is a red flag because people often use this term incorrectly, or they use it as a scare tactic to make people feel bad for using products or eating food that isn't "all natural"; not all things that are natural are safe or better for human use than something that is not deemed to be all natural. <br><br>connection: <br>I chose this article as my object for the red flag "all natural" because as a cosmetician and cosmetic student, all natural or "blank- free" products are very trendy to consumers right now, and I have even heard some people say that they want cosmetics without preservatives.<mark> This article debunks the notion that preservatives in cosmetics are bad and something to fear.</mark> In reality, they are 100% necessary to keep the formulas of our products stable and long lasting. People need to use their critical thinking when they think about cosmetic formulations as well as if they have concerns about specific ingredients, i<mark>t is easy to research that on your own and use the critical thinking process to help determine your answer.</mark></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://thegoodfaceproject.com/articles/preservatives" />
         <pubDate>2023-10-10 18:00:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mickenzicrowellssss/alkpr6mwxegaxn08/wish/2740433919</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Pseudoscience #2 - Results Can&#39;t Be Reproduced or Verified  </title>
         <author>mickenzicrowellssss</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mickenzicrowellssss/alkpr6mwxegaxn08/wish/2740503683</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br><em>Definition: </em><br>The definition for this red flag "Results cannot be reproduced" means that if someone is presenting findings and information from conducting an experiment or observing something, a different person doing the same experiment will not get the same results as the original. <br><br><em>Connection: </em><br>I wanted to go with ghost hunting as one of my Pseudocience connections because the topic interests me and I love paranormal/ ghost movies. I think this is a good example because it is light hearted and shows that it isn't necessarily a bad thing to participate in pseudoscience. This article is from a ghost hunting group that is local to me. The blog post talks about how the group went to Parkwood estate, and t<mark>hey documented the paranormal encounters they had there, but those results can never truly be verified&nbsp; or reproduced, making it fall onto the watchlist</mark></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://www.theparanormalseekers.ca/parkwood-estate---oshawa.html" />
         <pubDate>2023-10-10 18:47:47 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mickenzicrowellssss/alkpr6mwxegaxn08/wish/2740503683</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Reason For Belief #1 - Agenticity </title>
         <author>mickenzicrowellssss</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mickenzicrowellssss/alkpr6mwxegaxn08/wish/2740545728</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br><em>Definition:</em><br>the definition of agenticity is when people give meaning to "agents" that control the world, and it is mostly due to people confusing patterns with meaning. It is also when people believe in invisible beings and let them dictate their lives. <strong><em><br></em></strong><em><br>Connection: </em><br>I wanted to use this song "the antichrist" from band SLAYER because of the controversy that came from the bands use of satanic imagery. Bands like SLAYER and many others fall victim of people assigning a label to them before really trying to understand why they may be using specific themes in their music. Using satanic imagery for is to draw attention to issues in religious organizations, as well as for shock value. People assign meaning to the devil or satan that is not a proven fact- it is all based on personal beliefs and influences.&nbsp; People believe In the devil because they observe what they have been told their whole lives. <mark>Critical thinking can be used to understand why a band like slayer may use satanic imagery and how that does not mean they are evil and worship the devil.&nbsp;</mark></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xbd35DzBNgs" />
         <pubDate>2023-10-10 19:19:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mickenzicrowellssss/alkpr6mwxegaxn08/wish/2740545728</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Pseudoscience watchlist #3 - Deliberately Creates Mystery </title>
         <author>mickenzicrowellssss</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mickenzicrowellssss/alkpr6mwxegaxn08/wish/2740663618</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><em>Definition: </em><br>The watchlist includes the attribute "Deliberately creates mystery".&nbsp; This can include being intentionally vague about something while explaining it to people. It can also be when a person uses language that is confusing or misleading. <br><br><em>Connection:&nbsp; </em><br>I found this article during my research and I thought it was pretty funny, just how unspecific the "psychic medium"&nbsp; Scott Davis is when describing how an average Joe can communicate with the dead. He claims to have been able communicate with the dead and know facts about peoples lives for as long as he can remember, and since he was 3o he has been helping people. He says that anyone can speak to the dead, they just have to practice. He then says all that you need to do in order to practice is close your eyes and picture the person you want to communicate with, and then you write down whatever comes to you. I think this deliberately creates mystery because what he is describing can be called meditating, day dreaming, intentionally thinking, imagining and the list goes on. it creates mystery because it leaves the reader of the article still wondering exactly how doing what he said would allow you to speak with the dead. <mark>Mediums often use this tactic of creating mystery in order to convince clients and make money, another example of how psychic readings are a form of pseudoscience.&nbsp;</mark></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.insideedition.com/how-to-talk-to-the-dead-a-psychic-medium-shares-his-secrets-47937" />
         <pubDate>2023-10-10 21:08:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mickenzicrowellssss/alkpr6mwxegaxn08/wish/2740663618</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Red Flag #3 - Appeal To Authority </title>
         <author>mickenzicrowellssss</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mickenzicrowellssss/alkpr6mwxegaxn08/wish/2740667255</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><em>Definition: </em><br>The red flag "appeal to authority" is when a person believes something to to be true just because an authority figure says so. The authority figure can be a celebrity, a politician, religious leader or even family member.&nbsp; <br><br><em>Connection:<br></em>Appeal to authority can be very dangerous!&nbsp; As seen above, at one point in time, doctors did not know about the direct link between cancer and cigarettes, and cigarette companies often used images and quotes of doctors smoking their brand or endorsing it. This is an appeal to authority because people who saw those ads at the time may have been influenced to smoke or to smoke more since they seen a doctor-someone with authority - saying it was okay.&nbsp;Doctors are viewed in society as people with reputable knowledge and we trust them to take care of us, so that is why there is a power imbalance between doctors and people who are not doctors. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/2138681326/50aaaa3f4f929dc9a39ee0120c990517/camels_fresh_01_2015.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2023-10-10 21:12:20 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mickenzicrowellssss/alkpr6mwxegaxn08/wish/2740667255</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Reason For Belief #2 - Unexplained </title>
         <author>mickenzicrowellssss</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mickenzicrowellssss/alkpr6mwxegaxn08/wish/2740777721</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br><em>Definition</em>: <br>I think that "unexplained" is one of the most common reasons for belief that there is. People have always tried to find explanations for what we cannot understand. If we cannot find a rational or scientific reason for something occurring, we fill that hole with whatever works in our minds. <br><br>Connection: <br>I think Santa Claus is the perfect example for this reason for belief. Small children are not only told that Santa exists, but they experience the unexplainable! how did the presents get here after my parents went to sleep, and in different wrapping to! these are thoughts many of us had as children- that is part of the reason why we believe as much as we do as young kids. <mark>When we get a bit older, we develop critical thinking skills and the belief begins to waiver, but that emotional as well as possibly "unexplained" reasoning comes back.&nbsp;<br></mark><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/2138681326/dd00539468c14741b75912e93a8cd7a7/images_4.jpeg" />
         <pubDate>2023-10-10 23:55:43 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mickenzicrowellssss/alkpr6mwxegaxn08/wish/2740777721</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Red Flag #4 - Ancient Wisdom </title>
         <author>mickenzicrowellssss</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mickenzicrowellssss/alkpr6mwxegaxn08/wish/2741926819</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><em>Definition: <br></em>The red flag "ancient wisdom" is when a concept is reliable or accurate because it was practiced in the past by ancient civilizations. Often times the wisdom is unchanged or has changed very little over time.<br><br><em>connection: </em><br>For the red flag "Ancient wisdom" I wanted to talk about astrology. I think that astrology sort of falls under the same umbrella as religions, although some believers tend to try and say it is a science. The article I attached discusses some reasons why a person may believe In astrology. Some of the reasons include wanting an explanation for things happening to them in their life, wanting to belong and just to cope with life. I think that people also justify these beliefs by telling themselves that if something has been practiced by people for so long, it must hold some accuracy. <mark>It is easy to debunk astrology by using the critical thinking method. If your claim is "astrology accurately depicts my life and what happens to me" the second step- acknowledge bias- you would be forced to examine the emotional reasons for why you believe.&nbsp;<br></mark><br></div><div><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://theswaddle.com/why-do-people-still-believe-in-astrology/" />
         <pubDate>2023-10-11 14:28:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mickenzicrowellssss/alkpr6mwxegaxn08/wish/2741926819</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Reason For Belief #3 - Emotional Connection </title>
         <author>mickenzicrowellssss</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mickenzicrowellssss/alkpr6mwxegaxn08/wish/2742540936</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><em>Definition: <br></em>Emotional connection as a reason for belief overlaps with the other reasons as well, as emotion is sort of an underlying factor at most times<mark>. Peoples ability to think critically can often be clouded if emotions are involved</mark>. Peoples emotional ties to events, objects or things can be influenced by their own experiences, their environment, their morals and personal beliefs and their families. <br><br><em>Connection: <br></em>I think patriotism and nationalism are good examples of believing in something due to emotional connection and at times that means believing in certain actions.&nbsp;If we think about the American stereotype of the patriotic citizen, they love their country and are so connected to it due to emotions possibly from family history or their own life experiences. Americans love for their flag and their overall patriotism is all because of emotional connections. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/2138681326/b45812c32f0a5dd305c0d309e115d1fe/510px_Flag_of_the_United_States_svg.png" />
         <pubDate>2023-10-11 22:47:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mickenzicrowellssss/alkpr6mwxegaxn08/wish/2742540936</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Pseudoscience Watchlist #4 - Use of Meaningless Scientific Words  </title>
         <author>mickenzicrowellssss</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mickenzicrowellssss/alkpr6mwxegaxn08/wish/2742571272</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong><em>Definition: </em></strong><strong><br>The watchlist criteria "uses meaningless scientific words" is an important one to know and to be able to analyze. Some words are common buzzwords we hear in everyday conversation, but we may never stop to think about the true meaning behind said word- or if there is a meaning at all. The words can be made up of two real words, or a word with a made up prefix, and so on.<br><br></strong><strong><em>Connection: </em></strong><strong><br>I already did one post relating to the words "natural" but it relates to this topic just as well.</strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong>&nbsp;This topic interests me because the terms are often used in a way that shames or guilts people into thinking they need products labeled "toxin free" "all natural" "made from organic this or that". In my opinion, most of the time these broad claims are simply gimmicks. </strong><strong><mark>Looking through the lens of cosmetics again, consumers must use critical thinking in order to analyze the claims on products as well as consider marketing strategies.&nbsp;</mark></strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://thelogicofscience.com/2016/08/16/4-meaningless-words-toxin-natural-organic-and-gmo/" />
         <pubDate>2023-10-11 23:33:34 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mickenzicrowellssss/alkpr6mwxegaxn08/wish/2742571272</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Red Flag #5 - Confusing Correlation with Causation</title>
         <author>mickenzicrowellssss</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mickenzicrowellssss/alkpr6mwxegaxn08/wish/2744569262</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><em>Definition <br></em><sup>The red flag "confuses causation with correlation" is one that I think gets looked over in comparison to some of the other red flags. Correlation means connected or related and causation means it directly caused the events that follow. To confuse the two is easy. Just because two ideas or things are correlated, doesn't mean one caused the other or vice versa. <br><br></sup><em><sup>Connection <br></sup></em><sup>I chose to use politics as my example/connection. People usually blame a sole elected official for being responsible for all of the bad or good things that happen while they are in office, but there is a huge team and many different organizations and stuff that goes into all political choices and actions so no one person can really be blamed. People correlate a specific priminister with causing political issues/sucesses. </sup></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/2138681326/9cdbb60482e3d0bd7710eead98226489/360_F_206645985_LUU5rXVvAUz93icXzylypF2RJJ4y9RxL.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2023-10-13 03:01:39 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mickenzicrowellssss/alkpr6mwxegaxn08/wish/2744569262</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
