<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Erin Brockovich Discussion Q9 from semi-notes by Janine Carpenter</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/carpenter_janine/al0z9s71mm70</link>
      <description>Post your response to this question. Comment on other opinions if you wish.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2017-07-29 05:43:06 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-12-23 18:35:59 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Q:9 Do you think justice is more likely to be achieved if a case like this is heard by a single judge or a judge and jury? </title>
         <author>carpenter_janine</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/carpenter_janine/al0z9s71mm70/wish/179674007</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-07-29 05:47:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/carpenter_janine/al0z9s71mm70/wish/179674007</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Sophie </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/carpenter_janine/al0z9s71mm70/wish/180018294</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>A judge and a jury because the jury members would be able to relate to the plaintiffs and how they have been neglected. <br><br><strong><em>A jury selected from community would probably reflect general views more than a judge I agree but should justice be based on general views or the law? Tricky isnt it? (Janine)</em></strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-08-03 05:06:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/carpenter_janine/al0z9s71mm70/wish/180018294</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
