<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>4A Climate Change IS IT REAL? by Jeannie Lanio</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt</link>
      <description>Print out your name. Explain your thinking- One MOST believable and one LEAST believable.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-09-13 11:53:36 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-11-02 02:58:14 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Ece Cubukcu </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/280971599</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-09-13 17:36:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/280971599</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Nico Inman </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/280974264</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Most believable- American Association for the advancement of science. They state that global warming a problem caused by humans, and that we should act sooner rather than later, because the longer we wait the worse it'll be. They believe that the more that science develops the more that we can help fix the problem that we created.<br>Least believable- The National Center for Public Policy Research's mission statement focuses more on having a market economy and less on the factors of global warming as well any ways to solve these problems. They are also more concerned with national defense than the environment.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-09-13 17:40:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/280974264</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>George Lee</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/280978420</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I believe the <strong>American Association for the Advancement of Science&nbsp;</strong>is the most believable because they set goals such as &nbsp;</div><ul><li>Foster education in science and technology for everyone</li><li>Increase public engagement with science and technology</li><li>Advance international cooperation in science.&nbsp;</li></ul><div>Also, they are very organized in their plans.<br>The least believable is&nbsp; the <strong>Lavoisier Group</strong>&nbsp;because their website is sketchy and inferior. Their goals/aim is too broad and non descriptive.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-09-13 17:46:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/280978420</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Alexa Litzenberger</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/280978718</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Most Believable:&nbsp; <strong>Dept of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DE)</strong> because they state that they protect and manage our natural resources and our health and safety. <br>Least Believable: <strong>Union of Concerned Scientists </strong>because they are a nonprofit science advocacy organization based in the United States.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-09-13 17:47:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/280978718</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Maya Donaldson</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/280978754</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I believe that the &nbsp; | <strong>American Association for the Advancement of Science is the most believable because it is working to improve the planet and make advancements in order to help save the plant from the threat of humans. The least believable is the Heritage Foundation because they are working against laws put in place to protect the environment.<br><br></strong><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-09-13 17:47:03 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/280978754</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Esther Kim</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/280978810</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Most believable- American Association for the Advancement of Science because they seek to advance the world through education such as science, engineering, and innovation. <br><br>Least believable- National Center for Public Policy Research because they only provide market solutions and the focus is not in environmental concerns.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-09-13 17:47:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/280978810</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Jeremiah Gutierrez</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/280980101</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Most believable: American Association for the advancement of science because they stated that they seek to advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world to benefit the people. The least believable: Heritage Foundation because it states that global climate change is fake and isnt caused by humans, although it contradicts itself by stating that we need to limit our uses of natural resources and fossil fuels to prevent climate change.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-09-13 17:48:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/280980101</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Hanna Choi </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/280981425</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Most believable- Dept of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DE) because the organization focuses on protecting the environment and public safety.&nbsp;<br>Least believable- Heritage Foundation because their focus is more political than environmental. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-09-13 17:50:47 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/280981425</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Randy Ruch</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/280982293</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I think that the most believable organization is the National Academy of Sciences due to the fact that they try to not incorporate bias into their research. Their mission is to provide impartial evidence, and from their evidence they think that Humans impact climate change.<br>I think that the least believable organization is the&nbsp; <strong>American Association for the Advancement of Science</strong>&nbsp; due to the fact that their mission statement counteracts their position on climate change.&nbsp; They say that global climate change is due to humans, but their mission is to further science and engineering for the benefit of <strong>humans.</strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-09-13 17:52:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/280982293</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Camryn Flores</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/280983803</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The most believable mission statement was by the Department of Natural Resouces and Environmental Control, as it's mission statement was centered around the importance of protecting the environment and the people. The least believable mission statement was by the Competitive Enterprise Institute, as its mission statement is centered completely around improving business and has nothing to do with improving the environment.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-09-13 17:54:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/280983803</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ariana Carrero</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/280984051</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In my opinion the most believable mission statement was by the American Association for the Advancement of Science because provide proof that they&nbsp; promote and defend the integrity of science, strengthen support for the science and tech enterprise, and provide a voice for science. The least believable one was by the Competitive Enterprise Institute&nbsp;because in their mission statement all they talked about was business.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-09-13 17:54:54 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/280984051</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ritchie Pechin </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/280987882</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I believe that the&nbsp; <strong>American Association for the Advancement of Science</strong> is the most believable this is because i support their stance that global climate change that is caused by humans is a growing threat.&nbsp; The longer we wait, the harder and more expensive to deal with. They also are out to&nbsp; advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all people. I believe the least believable association is the Heritage Foundation that is because they believe&nbsp; Global warming is “Climate alarmism” and not human caused. Which is absurd. </div><div><br>&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-09-13 18:00:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/280987882</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Justin Kwack</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/281078599</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Most believable is the department of natural resources and environmental control because that group focuses on environmental protecting and safety.<br>The most unbelievable one is the heritage foundation because they believe more in the political side of things and don't believe that climate change has a big impact on the environment.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-09-13 22:01:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/281078599</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Michael Kim</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/281082899</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The organization that I believe has the most inherent bias is the Lavioiser Group. This is the case as their entire purpose is to argue against climate change as a political statement. With this, they not only deny human impact, but suggest it is all positive.&nbsp;<br><br>The least bias group in my opinion was NASA. NASA does not directly have any influence in terms of policies regarding climate change and are simply researchers in the given field. Because of this, any information they appear to show is objective by nature and should be regarded as at least relatively unbias.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-09-13 22:30:39 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/281082899</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Leyla hynson</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/281576334</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>To me the most believable was the American association for the advancement of science. They talk about the effects of global warming caused by humans and and why we should stop the problem before it progresses and gets worse. Their goal is to help the earth and decrease the negative effects of what humans have caused. They also believe that the more innovative technology we create will help better the earth&nbsp;<br><br>The least believable to me is the heritage foundation. They say that global warming is not a thing and is not caused by us humans, but they also say that we still need protect our planet and use less fossils fuels to prevent possible climate changes in the future. They are also fighting some laws that protect our environment and planet which is not a good thing in my opinion.</div><div><br></div><div><br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-09-15 03:26:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/281576334</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Sebastian Toledo</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/281693561</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The most believable organization was the American Association of Advancement of Science because it states that the longer we wait from acting on climate change, the more devastating it may be. They believe that the advancement of science can help treat the problem that humans have caused. The least believable organization is the Lavoisier Group because they believe that there is little to no connection between climate change and humans.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-09-15 14:52:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/281693561</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Sean Foster</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/282000890</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The organization that I found to have the most obvious bias within their main ideas was the Lavoisier Group, due to the shear fact that their organization is based solely upon promoting "vigorous debate".&nbsp; Not only this, but they downplay the obvious risk of the effects of global warming, and ultimately reject the scientific conclusion that human impact may cause it.<br><br>On the other hand, I believe that the organization presenting the least amount of bias is NASA, because of their history with aeronautics, research, and applied space exploration.  They are not a major deciding factor of these pressing topics such as global warming, but because of their major research and dedication to finding answers within this field, it is difficult to identify them as an organization with even a little bit of bias.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-09-16 18:54:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/282000890</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Sissy De Armas </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/282066617</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>•The one that I found most believable was the department of natural resources and environmental control due to the fact that they touch’s on water quality and management of natural resources which is very important.<br>•The one hat I found most unbelievable was the heritage foundation due to the fact that they are mostly based in D.C and very involved with the presidents and play a big role in thier conservation movements which is more political biased.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-09-17 00:57:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/282066617</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Heather Alcibar </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/282573097</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The organization that i found to be most believable was the American Association of Advancement of Science because they say that if we wait long enough until our environment starts getting worse it my be too late to make any changes. they believe that the advancement of science can help with the problems that humans have caused.<br>The least believable organization is the Lavoisier Group because they believe that humans have no fault as to why our planet is suffering these problems with the environment making it worse everyday with all the things we waste. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-09-17 19:30:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/282573097</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Olivia Mejeris</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/282659683</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The organization I found to be the most believable was the American Association because the talk about how humans are the things causing global climate change. And how if we don’t act now it will be harder to stop in the future. This organization also looks to advance science and innovation through out the world.&nbsp;<br>The least believable to me would be the Heritage foundation because they thing climate change is caused by something else and not by humans which is hard to process because what else could cause climate change.<br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-09-18 01:36:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jeannie_lanio/akimfveksuvt/wish/282659683</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
