Theories of Change as Tools for Equity by Emma Ramsbottom

Asset-based framing

2024-09-16 17:55:54 UTC

2024-09-16 17:56:07 UTC

As hinted at the beginning of our meeting- can we discuss more about how our anonymity might impact our ability to engage with communities and beneficiaries of our work?

Creative, meaningful, and asset-based visuals.

2024-09-16 17:57:22 UTC

emmaramsbottom — 2024-09-16 17:57:24 UTC

How do you address equity opportunities like asset-based framing when your internal partners already have a fully baked strategy?

+1 to the comment above, the support we provide to the unit that is more forward facing (CAS) also has to navigate with DEI related laws that are being proposed in NE. Would love to hear how LFA suggests focusing on CAS goals/evaluation when these might be in conflict with laws.

2024-09-16 17:58:07 UTC

2024-09-16 17:59:37 UTC

If direct engagement with community members to identify problems/need is less possible for STBF due to anonymity, what other inputs and information can we draw upon when developing TOCs?

Alignment (or lack thereof) across partners involved in the work.

2024-09-16 18:00:12 UTC

Testing assumptions

2024-09-16 18:01:18 UTC

Ideally, TOCs should be supported by evidence. What about when the TOC is for a novel strategy for which there isn't a lot of evidence one way or the other? What should be the starting point for bringing evidence to the work?

2024-09-16 18:02:02 UTC

2024-09-16 18:02:34 UTC

Can you share examples of how the TOC can be used to support decision-making on the more day-to-day level? Right now, it's easier to imagine using it at milestone moments

Defining equity/equitable process.

2024-09-16 18:03:21 UTC