<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Week 7_PHCM9132_Applied Research Methods for Public Health by UNSW Medicine &amp; Health</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/unswmedicineandhealth/methods_week7</link>
      <description>Week7</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2021-10-26 02:50:46 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2022-01-16 23:34:55 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Discussion</title>
         <author>unswmedicineandhealth</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/unswmedicineandhealth/methods_week7/wish/1843681605</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ol><li>What has been done in the field?</li><li>What is / are the research gaps?</li><li>What is /are the research questions?</li><li>Which methods have been used?</li><li>Pro and Cons of the research methods?</li><li>What were the key findings and next steps?</li><li>Questions </li></ol>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-26 02:52:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/unswmedicineandhealth/methods_week7/wish/1843681605</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Group 2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/unswmedicineandhealth/methods_week7/wish/1849568075</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. 11(?) food prescription studies. Most USA studies. Quasi-experimental (no control). Range of measures for results. 1 study had large number of participants, others smaller.&nbsp;<br>2. Most USA, not global. No RCT.&nbsp;<br>3. If food can be prescribed in same way as traditional prescription / replace.&nbsp;<br>4. Systematic review and meta analysis. Pilot mix methods. No control.&nbsp;<br>5.&nbsp;Pros - addresses food insecurity, provision of food to those who could not afford, novel concept. Limitation - all factors not taken into consideration in all studies. No control in studies. <br>6. Promising. Need more studies. Small sample size. 2 markers only.&nbsp;<br>Pilot pre-post, RCT. &nbsp;<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-27 22:26:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/unswmedicineandhealth/methods_week7/wish/1849568075</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Group 1 </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/unswmedicineandhealth/methods_week7/wish/1849570385</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1.&nbsp; Conceptually, NCDs + food security + 'food is medicine' as 'produce prescription' which is linked to disease and social determinants ( those living with low income or food insecurity)&nbsp;<br>2. Limited research which evaluated the 'healthy food' as a prescription programs as an effect on diet behaviour and CVD risk factor &nbsp;<br>3. Does 'healthy food' as a prescription program improve diet quality and CVD wellbeing when compared to poor diet quality and CVD in those who experience food insecurity or low income.&nbsp;<br>4. Systematic review with meta-analysis&nbsp; which included 13 papers which used in<br>5. +ve -ve workload&nbsp;<br>6.&nbsp;<br>7.&nbsp; How is it working in a big team?&nbsp;<br>Kate to ask about education factors for participants<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-27 22:28:03 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/unswmedicineandhealth/methods_week7/wish/1849570385</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
