https://padlet.com/1028645/ad00wnxsrr9n5xhr en-us 2020-10-05 03:22:02 UTC 2020-10-05 04:15:09 UTC hello@padlet.com 1028645 https://padlet.com/1028645/ad00wnxsrr9n5xhr/wish/801748557 - Federalists: George Washington, John Adams, Alexander Hamilton
- Democratic-Republicans: Jefferson, James Madison
- 1777-mid 19th century 
- Chisholm v. Georgia (1793) resulted in 11th Amendment and less state power
- McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) in favor of national government
- Gibbons v. Odgen (1824) Congress could regulate interstate commerce; shut down New York law allowing steamboat monopoly
- controversy over whether the national government or state government had more power. Though states argued they wanted more power, national government won three landmark court cases during this time, granting the national government more power.
- "layer cake" federalism: no interactions between national, state, or local government]]> 2020-10-05 03:28:14 UTC https://padlet.com/1028645/ad00wnxsrr9n5xhr/wish/801748557 1028645 https://padlet.com/1028645/ad00wnxsrr9n5xhr/wish/801762156 - Federalist: John Marshall
- Democratic-Republican: Roger Taney
- national and state governments are different, little overlap
- strict interpretation of the Constitution
- Barron v. Baltimore (1833): state law overpowers Constitution and Bill of Rights
- Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857): slaves were property no matter what or where, Missouri Compromise violated 5th Amendment because making slavery illegal in some states deprived slave owners of property. More state power and contributed to Civil War.
- mid 19th century to early 20th century
- more state power, state power had won in two major court cases
- "layer cake" federalism: no interactions between national, state, or local government]]> 2020-10-05 03:37:51 UTC https://padlet.com/1028645/ad00wnxsrr9n5xhr/wish/801762156 1028645 https://padlet.com/1028645/ad00wnxsrr9n5xhr/wish/801799332 early 20th century-today
- Franlin D Roosevelt
- direct election of senators (17th Amendment) no longer sate legislatures electing them so that corrupt state legislatures would have less power (Progressive)
- national government was more involved in what typically belonged to the state power
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones and Laughlin Steel Corporation (1937): broad interpretation of necessary and proper clause, less state power, National Labor Relations Act of 1935 was upheld
- "marble cake" 1937-today where boundaries between state and national power blurred and they work together
- neither national or state power is more powerful than the other; they cooperate and collaborate on the same problems
- Picket-fence federalism: 1960s-today where national and state government cooperate in many activities such as agriculture, environment, housing, etc.

]]> 2020-10-05 04:03:37 UTC https://padlet.com/1028645/ad00wnxsrr9n5xhr/wish/801799332