<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Apple Inc | PC Industry Attractiveness &amp; Evolution by Majo Murcia</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/majomurcia/abrihvnwwwmygxvx</link>
      <description>FT MBA | Prof. Majo Mucia</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2021-11-10 18:40:32 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-02-05 02:54:56 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>majomurcia</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/majomurcia/abrihvnwwwmygxvx/wish/1974165454</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong><mark>* 1980s </mark></strong></p><p>High - Intel offered superior hardware performance while integrated into a PC and companies providing microprocessors were very few.</p><p><br></p><p>Apple was forced to change its hardware design including Intel chips to avoid getting outpaced by competition.</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><mark><br></mark><strong><mark>* Today</mark></strong></p><p>Medium - Companies that manufacture microprocessors haven't proliferated exponentially and it is an industry still dominated by a handful of players, even though they don't have the same power as before due to the arrival of new potentially substituting technologies such as ARM.</p><p><br></p><p><br></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-01-04 13:34:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/majomurcia/abrihvnwwwmygxvx/wish/1974165454</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>majomurcia</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/majomurcia/abrihvnwwwmygxvx/wish/1974170562</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong><mark>1980s</mark></strong></p><p>Low- Limited amount of PC providing companies.</p><p>PCs were expensive, few houses could afford a PC.</p><p><br></p><p>Industry Lifecycle stage: Introduction </p><p><br></p><p><strong><mark><br>&nbsp;Today</mark></strong></p><p>High- Saturated market with competitors, greater variety of product offerings regarding price, design and functionalities.</p><p>PCs prices now are more accessible to a wider audience.</p><p><br></p><p>PC's are tending towards commoditization.</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-01-04 13:36:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/majomurcia/abrihvnwwwmygxvx/wish/1974170562</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>majomurcia</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/majomurcia/abrihvnwwwmygxvx/wish/2462956356</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong><mark>* 1980s </mark></strong></p><p>Low market barriers to entry, no single player controlled the industry.</p><p><br/></p><p>Nevertheless, development of technological standards required and novel risky market could compromise access to funds.</p><p><mark><br></mark><strong><mark>* Today</mark></strong></p><p><br/></p><p>High: Economies of scale and high brand loyalty </p><p>Market concentration: Lenovo, Hp, dell control 65% of the market</p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-01-31 13:13:47 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/majomurcia/abrihvnwwwmygxvx/wish/2462956356</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>majomurcia</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/majomurcia/abrihvnwwwmygxvx/wish/2462958120</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong><mark>* 1980s </mark></strong></p><p>Software: Microsoft offered a highly conditioning complement in its OS (Windows) that could and did influence Apple's manufacturing practices, specifically in what regards to granting interoperability with its hardware.</p><p><br/></p><p>Regarding potential products that could substitute personal PCs at that time, you could label other luxury personal use tech products such as TVs, regarding personal PCs.</p><p><br/></p><p><mark><br></mark><strong><mark>* Today</mark></strong></p><p>Medium: </p><p>Smartphones getting more powerfull processors and storage capacity are replacing some task.</p><p><br/></p><p>Medium:</p><p>Cloud services also reduce the need of a PC.</p><p>Decives such as Chrome box as a sustitute with lower price.</p><p><br/></p><p>Apple envisioned a holistic Apple product with their own chip, apps, software. Until now Apple relies on rival products.</p><p><br/></p><p>Gaming consoles like Playstation and XboX are substitutes for gaming activities</p><p><br/></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-01-31 13:15:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/majomurcia/abrihvnwwwmygxvx/wish/2462958120</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>majomurcia</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/majomurcia/abrihvnwwwmygxvx/wish/2462959007</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong><mark>* 1980s </mark></strong></p><p>High: </p><ul><li><p>IBM competed for product innovation</p></li><li><p>IBM created price competition, leading Apple to premium segment </p></li></ul><p><br/></p><p><mark><br></mark><strong><mark>* Today</mark></strong></p><p>Higher:</p><ul><li><p>HP (23,6% market share)</p></li><li><p>Lenovo (24,3% market share)</p></li><li><p>Dell (17,5% market share)</p></li><li><p>More players</p></li><li><p>Slim margins for commodity PCs</p></li><li><p>Apple shifted to services instead of relying on PC sales</p></li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-01-31 13:15:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/majomurcia/abrihvnwwwmygxvx/wish/2462959007</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Buyer Power</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/majomurcia/abrihvnwwwmygxvx/wish/3314322643</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>1980s: </p><ul><li><p>limited buyer power </p></li><li><p>highly concentrated market =&gt; Apple or IBM</p></li><li><p>no alternatives/ price comparison as readily available =&gt; no references/ reviews</p></li></ul><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p>2020:</p><ul><li><p>higher buyer power </p></li><li><p>comparison websites available</p></li><li><p>more saturated market</p></li><li><p>more price elastic due to higher competition</p></li><li><p>low switching costs</p></li><li><p>but high brand loyalty</p></li></ul><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-02-03 22:17:01 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/majomurcia/abrihvnwwwmygxvx/wish/3314322643</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Supplier Power</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/majomurcia/abrihvnwwwmygxvx/wish/3314324636</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>1980s: </p><ul><li><p>high supplier power because of high concentration</p></li><li><p>forerunners =&gt; absence of substitutes &amp; high switching costs </p></li><li><p>apple developed own soft- &amp; hardware, IBM depended on Intel &amp; Microsoft</p></li></ul><p><br/></p><p>2020: </p><ul><li><p>lower supplier power</p></li><li><p>low concentration, more commoditized market</p></li><li><p>lower switching costs because of more substitutes </p></li></ul><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-02-03 22:19:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/majomurcia/abrihvnwwwmygxvx/wish/3314324636</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Competitive rivalry</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/majomurcia/abrihvnwwwmygxvx/wish/3314324904</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>1980s: </p><ul><li><p>very low number of competitors but fierce competition btwn Apple &amp; IBM</p></li><li><p>reduced market, very concentrated =&gt; Oligopoly</p></li><li><p>higher profit margins on sales (10.000$ Apple PCs)</p></li></ul><p><br/></p><p>2020:</p><ul><li><p>higher number of players in market </p></li><li><p>reduced margins on PC sales with increased competition</p></li></ul><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-02-03 22:20:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/majomurcia/abrihvnwwwmygxvx/wish/3314324904</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Threat of New Entry</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/majomurcia/abrihvnwwwmygxvx/wish/3314331546</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>1980s: </p><ul><li><p>lower barriers to entry </p></li><li><p>still in the process of developing/ research, a lot of undiscovered potential</p></li><li><p>easier to differentiate/ distinguish from competitors</p></li><li><p>no economies of scale built yet, like brand loyalty/ names </p></li><li><p>less capital needed for initial investment to enter</p></li><li><p>no network externalities built yet</p></li></ul><p><br></p><p>2020: </p><ul><li><p>high entry barriers =&gt; saturated, mature market with known brand names </p></li><li><p>difficult to compete for newcomer because of brand loyalty</p></li><li><p>economies of scale for incumbent firms</p></li><li><p>higher initial capital required for marketing campaigns, licenses etc</p></li><li><p>buyers are hesitant to switch</p></li><li><p>network built amongst incumbents</p></li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-02-03 22:29:46 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/majomurcia/abrihvnwwwmygxvx/wish/3314331546</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Substitutes </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/majomurcia/abrihvnwwwmygxvx/wish/3314333216</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>1980s: </p><ul><li><p>very low threat of substitutes </p></li><li><p>much harder to compare amongst competitors =&gt; lower propensity to substitute</p></li><li><p>limited software available in general</p></li></ul><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p>2020: </p><ul><li><p>threat of substitutes from competitors </p></li><li><p>own products cannibalizing PCs</p></li><li><p>comparison websites more easily accessible =&gt; lower switching costs</p></li></ul><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-02-03 22:32:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/majomurcia/abrihvnwwwmygxvx/wish/3314333216</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
