Possible Critiques of Constructivism? by Jake Mohling

no right answer

2023-10-28 14:10:07 UTC

requirement of qualitative data may be hard for large programs

2023-10-28 14:10:14 UTC

Without hypothesis, do you end up some place you were not trying to go?

2023-10-28 14:10:31 UTC

No "hard proof" that it works

awerley — 2023-10-28 14:10:34 UTC

time intensive. When does it stop? (Can always be building)

lauravw1 — 2023-10-28 14:10:35 UTC

Does not necessarily account for cultural differences between groups

2023-10-28 14:10:36 UTC

2023-10-28 14:10:43 UTC

can be ambigious

a good outside evaluator may be hard to find and expensive.

2023-10-28 14:10:43 UTC

how do case studies stay as evaluative and not research?

2023-10-28 14:10:45 UTC

2023-10-28 14:10:47 UTC

extensive time needed to evaluate

2023-10-28 14:11:08 UTC

A critique from a more positivist lens could be that constructivism does not really uncover the true nature of reality because there is a more object answer to reality.

2023-10-28 14:11:13 UTC

Time sensitive

bias based on evaluator values

2023-10-28 14:11:27 UTC

Must be aware of own values

2023-10-28 14:11:27 UTC

Qualitative study may short or limited

2023-10-28 14:11:28 UTC

determining a qualified evaluator may be difficult

2023-10-28 14:11:30 UTC

2023-10-28 14:11:35 UTC

may be hard to find shareholders that agree on goals/purpose

Can be difficult to sustain long-term for teachers.

awerley — 2023-10-28 14:11:44 UTC

no goals for the outcome leads to ambiguous results

2023-10-28 14:11:45 UTC

The equality of all perspectives may skew verifiable information away from reality

2023-10-28 14:11:50 UTC

2023-10-28 14:12:14 UTC

what is the true reality