Firstly, in a company it is usually more than one people to work. As a result, the collectivism is clearly more applicable to companies. Collectivism means that there are many people who can work together and face the same problem. Different people have different ideas. This means they may have much more ideas than the individualism. The more ideas you have, the more solutions you have to solve the problem perfectly. This is what individualism does not have. However, collectivism also has some disadvantages. If there are too many people, it will be very difficult to lead this group of people. The number of people also means that the conflicts between people will also increase.

    In conclusion, collectivism is bound to do more good than bad, so this is still society's first choice.

    First, there are already 7.9 billion people on the planet, and in the next few decades, the population will exceed 10 billion.  This has caused very serious problems, such as the problem of environmental pollution, wars caused by disagreements between countries, the temperature of the Earth increase quickly, the low quality of living environment caused by the large population, and the reduction of living space. Regarding the problem of environmental pollution, human beings use plastic every day, which leads to plastic pollution.  Every plastic bag takes at least a few hundred years to degrade naturally.  In order to deal with plastic pollution, many countries use paper to replace plastic. Although this method can effectively reduce plastic pollution, it also increases the consumption of trees. Next is the greenhouse effect caused by global warming, where the average global temperature is gradually rising due to excessive human carbon dioxide emissions.  The greenhouse effect caused the melting of glaciers in the Arctic and Antarctic.  In this way, the sea level will rise, and if human beings do not take action, some coastal cities will be submerged by sea water.

     In general, this is the reason why I feel that the earth is overpopulated, and I hope that everyone can protect the environment and contribute a little to the protection of the earth.

   First of all, having a very good memory is considered a very good thing by many people.  If a person has a very good memory, he can remember the information he needs in a very short time, and he can even remember it.  But there are downsides to having an amazing memory, and it's hard for them to forget things.  For example, when a person with a strong memory is bullied, it is difficult for them to forget the memory of being bullied.  These memories may play out over and over again in their minds, causing these people to find themselves in a very distressing situation.  Another disadvantage of having a good memory is that they have a very chaotic memory because it is difficult for them to forget things.

    In general, it is difficult to forget a painful event and is torture for people with very good memory.  That's my point.

   First of all, I think we need to do a good job of confidentiality when investigating.  We need to protect the identities and reasons of the respondents, because if these secrecy work is not done well, there may be bad rumors about the respondents.  Second, I think we need to investigate in a form of justice.  We cannot use the goodness of others as bait to conduct investigations.  There is a movie about a thief who uses his skills to open a safe and steal the money inside, and disguise himself as a security guard in another city.  In order to prove that the thief had the skills to open the safe, the police lied that a child had hid in the safe and asked for the thief's help.  The thief opened the safe out of kindness, but it was not a child, but a tape recorder playing the cry of the child, and the thief was eventually caught.  I don't think we can use other people's goodness as bait to conduct investigations.  For taking good as bait is worse than evil.

    In conclusion, I think the above is the code of ethics that needs to be followed when investigating.

   Firstly the developing technology do not make people communicate with others. In the 20th century, the mobile phone was only used as a communication tool, in order to make it easier for people to communicate.  When mobile phones were not yet widespread, people could only use landlines or telephone booths to make calls to others.  Since the advent of mobile phones, people don't have to go to a phone booth or use a landline. However, with the development of technology, smart phones are becoming more and more popular, and smart phones are no longer like old-fashioned mobile phones that can only be used to make calls.  Smartphones can have various applications installed, such as chat applications and games.  The popularity of these applications makes more people do not know how to communicate face-to-face. This has resulted in people only communicating on their phones rather than face-to-face. I think that is one of the main reasons why technology makes the life worse.

   Secondly since there are entertainment apps, people are less and less likely to exercise. People are addicted to entertainment apps all day, causing people to become lazy and not want to exercise. People watch variety shows and short videos all day long, for example TikTok. People are used to these videos on the Internet.  They start to get lazy and don't exercise.  Because of not exercising, this has led to an increase in obesity rates. This makes people’s life worse.

   Thirdly people do not think much about what they say online. They do not think they are legally responsible for doing something wrong online. In China, cyberbullying is a serious problem.  People tend to comment on only one-sided information on the Internet. To give an example, some time ago, in Tangshan, China, a female high school student went to a barbecue restaurant to celebrate with her friends after her exam. However, a group of men sexually harassed the female high school student.  The girl tried to resist, but the behavior angered the group of men.  The group of men started violence against the girl and her friend.  They put the girl in intensive care.  However, some people on the Internet started to speak up.  They always thought that it was the girl who tried to resist and caused her to be beaten, so it was the girl's fault.  People online also promote the theory of victim culpability. The remarks dealt a severe blow to the girl's parents.  This is also one of the reasons why the quality of life has declined after the development of technology.

     In conclusion, with the development