<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>TOK Exhibition FAQ by </title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2021-04-02 10:21:23 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2023-02-15 23:20:08 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Write your question, and we will answer it</title>
         <author>popov_research</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1377834188</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-04-02 10:21:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1377834188</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Is it OK to use the same prompt and object that was used for the mini exhibition for the real one this time around?</title>
         <author>popov_research</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1410854713</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-04-13 07:55:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1410854713</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>What is the word limit for the entire essay? And do we need to define the prompt?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1415336542</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-04-14 07:28:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1415336542</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Is this an independent piece of work, can we work in twos?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1431085013</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-04-19 01:55:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1431085013</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>When answering the essay title, should our answers contain two areas of knowledge frameworks or only one? which one would be more ideal? </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1431099120</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-04-19 02:01:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1431099120</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Would it be alright to use an object that was mentioned in the textbook? (I want to write about the photograph of the galaxies from the Hubble space telescope on the topic of theory laden facts and knowledge constraints)</title>
         <author>aileenbaiyang1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1431132626</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-04-19 02:17:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1431132626</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>One IA prompt consists of the term &quot;material tools&quot;— however, is this strictly limited to physical entities that produce measurements or observations? Can virtual technology be accepted (for example, search engines?)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1431138659</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-04-19 02:20:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1431138659</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Does ethics count as an area of knowledge?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1431156114</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-04-19 02:27:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1431156114</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>How many WOK do we need to link our objects to?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1431157497</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-04-19 02:28:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1431157497</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Are we allowed to do 2 similar objects (ie: both objects are paintings but from different artists?) </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1433154424</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-04-19 13:58:39 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1433154424</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>If I want to use a PhD degree as an object but I want to talk about how the knowledge you gain from a PhD varies in their usefulness depending on what kind of PhD degree you get. (My prompt is: Are some types of knowledge more useful than others?) But I heard that you need to be every specific with your object, would this still be possible?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1436193546</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-04-20 04:12:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1436193546</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Is it ok if my &quot;justification of inclusion of object into exhibition&quot; is only 1 line? I included the 3 of my objects because they bring 3 different points to answering my prompt, but wouldn&#39;t the elaboration overlap with &quot;linking object with prompt&quot;? </title>
         <author>minnietse2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1436571935</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-04-20 06:49:43 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1436571935</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Is it ok for me to consider the implications behind the prompt? (eg my prompt is &quot;Why do we seek knowledge&quot; and in my paragraph I&#39;ll elaborate on the strengths and problems that arise from seeking knowledge in that way?) </title>
         <author>minnietse2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1436579396</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-04-20 06:52:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1436579396</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>In the TOK textbook it is recommended that we have a concluding paragraph. What should we put in the concluding paragraph? </title>
         <author>minnietse2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1436593360</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-04-20 06:56:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1436593360</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>My prompt: Can new knowledge change established views or beliefs? Question: Would it be better for me to use an example where there is a definitive answer e.g. new knowledge CAN/ CANNOT change established views or beliefs, or where the answer depends on some conditions e.g. situations where perfectly logical, cogent evidence is presented in contradiction to an established view that is equally well-justified (in cases like these whether this new knowledge can change one&#39;s belief depends on factors such as open-mindedness/ one’s status in a knowledge community and so forth)? </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1436840272</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-04-20 08:18:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1436840272</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>If my prompt is “what counts as knowledge?”, can I write about an object which discusses why the question of ‘what is knowledge’ is important? </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1436885192</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-04-20 08:33:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1436885192</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>If my prompt is &quot;What is the relationship between personal experience and knowledge?&quot;, do i need to include the types of knowledge, e.g. tacit knowledge, explicit knowledge etc.?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1437432277</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-04-20 11:59:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1437432277</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>My prompt is &quot;Are some types of knowledge more useful than others?&quot; and I have chosen my piano and my biology textbook as 2 objects but I&#39;m stuck on how to approach </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1440695297</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-04-21 02:07:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1440695297</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>I want to write about the prompt &quot;Can new knowledge change established values or beliefs&quot; and I want to use the objects a photo of Santa, a photo of a cross and an easter bunny to explain how children&#39;s belief change over time because of new knowledge.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1445575241</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-04-22 04:23:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1445575241</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>If we dont need to use AOK&#39;s do we still need to link it to the different frameworks?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1449736150</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-04-22 23:40:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1449736150</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>do we need to present this later after we hand it in?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1450907714</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-04-23 08:36:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1450907714</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>&quot;How might the context in which knowledge is presented influence whether it is accepted or rejected?&quot; which key terms should I define in the introduction </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1451381715</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-04-23 12:26:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1451381715</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Do we have to include hyperlinks to the photos of our objects? What if the photo is a screenshot of personal profile we cannot provide a public link to?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1454035786</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-04-24 02:18:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1454035786</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>If I want to bring up a theory to illustrate my point (e.g. how organaization/classification or knowledge makes us susceptible to confirmation bias), would I have to explain what the theory is (ie.e. confirmation bias)?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1454071742</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-04-24 02:57:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1454071742</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Does our objects have to be personal? Do we have to link it back to how it affected us or how we are impacted by the object? </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1455504605</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-04-25 03:46:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1455504605</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>My chosen prompt: Can new knowledge change established beliefs? </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1483442908</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>May I get some advice on whether these three dimensions explored are ok:&nbsp;<br><br>1. New knowledge can possibly change a (wrongly) established view if the method by which it is produced is more reliable. It also depends on the knower’s open mindedness i.e. the extent to which he/she is willing to acknowledge the wrongness of the original view.&nbsp;<br><br>2. New knowledge can change an established view when the knower provisionally accepts the original knowledge claim made, along with the possibility that said claim can be refuted with future evidence. This attitude allows for healthy development of knowledge, because the knower can ensure that he is not forming baseless beliefs.&nbsp;<br><br>3. New knowledge cannot change entrenched beliefs because they are unfalsifiable. The refusal to change an established view however strong the new knowledge or good the methodology that has produced it is, is often due to a strong personal connection between the established belief, personal identity and religious shared knowledge.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-05-03 01:08:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1483442908</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>During the round of moderation, will every single one of our papers be looked at? </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1483728435</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-05-03 03:45:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/1483728435</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>For our three different objects, do we need to have different approaches in choosing them? And if so, how? (My prompt is: How might the context in which knowledge is presented influence whether it is accepted or rejected?) </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/2478450021</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-02-13 06:28:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/popov_research/TOKexhibitionFAQ/wish/2478450021</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
