<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Landmark Supreme Court cases  by </title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/0733789/a3sgyy20o2dn5jg6</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2024-03-01 15:08:26 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2024-03-05 15:25:40 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Marbuy v. Madison (1803)</title>
         <author>0733789</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/0733789/a3sgyy20o2dn5jg6/wish/2902131880</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Can the court issue court orders and can the court rule on cases and their constitutionality&nbsp;<br><br><br>Significance: the Supreme Court established judicial review the ability to review the ability to review laws, cases, decisions, etc and judge their consitutinally&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d0/Marbury.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2024-03-01 15:28:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/0733789/a3sgyy20o2dn5jg6/wish/2902131880</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Dred Scott v. Sanford  (1857)</title>
         <author>0733789</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/0733789/a3sgyy20o2dn5jg6/wish/2902137169</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The legal issue was that are blacks citizens (free or enslaved) and if a slave moves to a free state does that make them free ?<br><br><br>Significance: it meant that the Missouri compromise, which had divided the Louisiana purchase, which had divided into free and slave territories, was no longer lawful. This increased tension and helped lead to the civil war.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.thoughtco.com/thmb/g43jci7ReQQEQbjtr7D_Dt4-ShE=/250x0/filters:no_upscale():max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/DredScott-1--5895c6355f9b5874eeefec1f.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2024-03-01 15:32:57 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/0733789/a3sgyy20o2dn5jg6/wish/2902137169</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Brown v. Board of education of Topeka (1954)</title>
         <author>0733789</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/0733789/a3sgyy20o2dn5jg6/wish/2902985696</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Supreme Court ruled that “separate but equal” segregation was violation of the equal protection clause&nbsp;<br><br><br>This case ended segregation. It was the beginning of the end of Jim Crow laws in the south&nbsp;<br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://cdn.britannica.com/25/91825-050-6828171F/George-EC-Hayes-Thurgood-Marshall-court-James-May-17-1954.jpg?w=500&amp;h=500" />
         <pubDate>2024-03-02 23:10:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/0733789/a3sgyy20o2dn5jg6/wish/2902985696</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)</title>
         <author>0733789</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/0733789/a3sgyy20o2dn5jg6/wish/2902987895</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The legal issue Herman plessy said his 14 amendment rights (equal protection clause) had been violated.&nbsp;<br><br><br>Significance: established separate but equal doctrine. As a result, southern states strengthened segregation laws.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://cdn.britannica.com/32/196332-050-C290BF87/Clarence-Earl-Gideon-1961.jpg?w=400&amp;h=300&amp;c=crop" />
         <pubDate>2024-03-02 23:23:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/0733789/a3sgyy20o2dn5jg6/wish/2902987895</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Miranda v. Arizona (1966)</title>
         <author>0733789</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/0733789/a3sgyy20o2dn5jg6/wish/2906294062</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Miranda appealed claiming that he had not received warning or legal counsel to guide his decision to confess&nbsp;<br><br>Significance:all suspects must be forewarned that they have the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://www.todayifoundout.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/miranda.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2024-03-05 13:48:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/0733789/a3sgyy20o2dn5jg6/wish/2906294062</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)</title>
         <author>0733789</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/0733789/a3sgyy20o2dn5jg6/wish/2906356976</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Herman Plessy said his 14th amendment rights (equal protection clause) had been violated.<br><br><br><br>Significance: established separation but equal doctrine as a result southern states strengthened segregation laws.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://teachingamericanhistory.org/content/uploads/2021/09/400px-Portrait_of_Henry_Billings_Brown-e1537204505320-300x243.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2024-03-05 14:26:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/0733789/a3sgyy20o2dn5jg6/wish/2906356976</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>In de gault (1967)</title>
         <author>0733789</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/0733789/a3sgyy20o2dn5jg6/wish/2906442575</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Legal issue were gault 14 amendment rights (due process clause)&nbsp;<br><br><br>Significance:guarantees the Same due process rights for juveniles as adults&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://media.firstcoastnews.com/assets/WXIA/images/5fb41792-9d05-4dd9-89d9-f7b2467e3f44/5fb41792-9d05-4dd9-89d9-f7b2467e3f44_1920x1080.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2024-03-05 15:18:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/0733789/a3sgyy20o2dn5jg6/wish/2906442575</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988)</title>
         <author>0733789</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/0733789/a3sgyy20o2dn5jg6/wish/2906450802</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Does the 1 a amendment protect school sponsored publication from censorship&nbsp;<br><br><br>Significance: ruled that school newspaper are sponsored by the school and articles not directly reflecting the views of the school for learning purposes can be deleted.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://landmarkcases.org/wp-content/uploads/Hazelwood-v-Kuhlmeier.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2024-03-05 15:23:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/0733789/a3sgyy20o2dn5jg6/wish/2906450802</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>United States v. Nixon 1974</title>
         <author>0733789</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/0733789/a3sgyy20o2dn5jg6/wish/2906454521</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Does executive privilege excuse the need the president from Turning over documents needed as evidence in criminal proceedings&nbsp;<br><br><br>Significance: decision proved that even the president is not above the rule of law</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://libapps.s3.amazonaws.com/accounts/101120/images/nixonresign.jpeg" />
         <pubDate>2024-03-05 15:25:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/0733789/a3sgyy20o2dn5jg6/wish/2906454521</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
