müthiş padlet'im by Oğuz Akkoç https://padlet.com/oguz99akkoc99/a34dhdbigyacbz2y en-us 2022-10-12 06:55:34 UTC 2023-01-09 20:05:04 UTC hello@padlet.com Gender Politics oguz99akkoc99 https://padlet.com/oguz99akkoc99/a34dhdbigyacbz2y/wish/2336538837 What does Rousseau believe to be natural characterstics for men and women?
The same organs, similar appearance, etc. make it look like a machine; Same parts. both sexes basically exist with their own feelings and desires. In this context, many features are common; common sense. These, in turn, can be divided into various parts as the features that make a man a woman and a woman.

 What kind of education and marriage he sees fit for women?

It is stated that women's education should be planned according to men. In addition, it was observed differently in both sexes, that is, this difference was also attributed to education, like those who do not think of sending dreams. They are thought to prefer an educated man simply grown up rather than a learned lady. They despise women's work from the lofty height of his genius. It has been said that women have duties such as being pleasant in the eyes of men, earning the love of respect, making their life beautiful and happy, apart from education. The riches, traditional views, positions that they need to choose suitable husbands for themselves do not make sense, the important thing is to choose the person who is suitable for them in terms of personality and character. It has been stated that physical strength, good character and family love are important for marriage.]]> 2022-10-12 06:56:06 UTC https://padlet.com/oguz99akkoc99/a34dhdbigyacbz2y/wish/2336538837 Why is monarchy not as durable as the subjection of women ? Why does Lock believe that women’s subjection is one of the most durable forms of injustice? oguz99akkoc99 https://padlet.com/oguz99akkoc99/a34dhdbigyacbz2y/wish/2427292297 Monarchy the form of government where a single individual rules a nation has existed since ancient times, however, its longevity and durability has been questionable. Many have noted that compared to the subjugation of women, which has been present in numerous cultures since time immemorial, monarchy has been much less long-lasting. This could be attributed to the fact that the subjugation of women has been a consistent and expected role in society throughout history, while the position of monarch is often filled by those who are born into that role and is not seen as an integral part of society by many people. Additionally, those who take on the role of monarch often lack the necessary skills and experience to effectively rule their country and are replaced quickly.
Although monarchy has been a form of government for centuries, it has proven to be less durable than the subjugation of women. For many societies, the patriarchal structure of power has long been a cornerstone of their culture and has been historically reinforced by laws and social norms. This is in stark contrast to monarchies, which have seen a steady decline in power and influence over the years. Women’s subjugation, on the other hand, still persists in many cultures even today, with the oppression of women being seen as an inherent part of society.
According to John Locke, the subordination of women is one of the most durable forms of injustice because it is rooted in a deep-seated patriarchal structure that has been in place for centuries. He believes that it is perpetuated by both institutional and social norms, as well as a lack of economic opportunity, which has kept women from being able to gain any real power or influence. Furthermore, it is only by challenging these societal norms, and by providing women with more economic opportunities and autonomy, that true equality can be achieved.  This is why Locke believes that providing women with more equitable opportunities is one of the most effective ways of combating this form of injustice.




]]> 2022-12-22 07:44:04 UTC https://padlet.com/oguz99akkoc99/a34dhdbigyacbz2y/wish/2427292297 What is public and private spheres? And how are they related to gender inequality? oguz99akkoc99 https://padlet.com/oguz99akkoc99/a34dhdbigyacbz2y/wish/2427293615 The public and private spheres are distinct entities that govern our lives. The public sphere encompasses individuals who are active in social, political, and economic affairs, while the private sphere refers to individuals who are not as involved in such activities. Public life includes a variety of activities such as voting, attending public meetings, participating in political campaigns, and engaging in public debates. Private life, on the other hand, refers to activities such as purchasing groceries, providing childcare, and volunteering at a local charitable organization.
The public and private spheres with gender inequality playing an important role in defining the boundaries between the two. In many societies, women are seen as belonging to the private sphere while men are seen as belonging to the public sphere. This can create a power imbalance where men are seen as more authoritative or knowledgeable than women, leading to a gender gap in access to resources and opportunities. Women may be excluded from decision-making roles in the public sphere, thus limiting their ability to influence societal change.




]]> 2022-12-22 07:46:52 UTC https://padlet.com/oguz99akkoc99/a34dhdbigyacbz2y/wish/2427293615 Summarize three ways in which feminists have contributed to our understanding of International Relations. oguz99akkoc99 https://padlet.com/oguz99akkoc99/a34dhdbigyacbz2y/wish/2427300205 From the beginning, feminist theory has challenged the near-total absence of women from traditional IR theory and practice. This absence is reflected both in women's exclusion from decision-making and in the assumption that the realities of women's everyday lives are neither influenced nor important in international relations. Furthermore, feminist contributions to IR can also be understood through the deconstruction of gender, both as a socially constructed identity and as a powerful organizational logic. means recognizing and challenging the assumptions about male and female gender roles that determine what should or can be done and what is important in considering international relations. To do. These assumptions, in turn, shape global political processes and their impact on the lives of men and women. Instead of arguing that traditional IR is gender neutral, that is, that gender and IR are two separate domains that do not affect each other, feminist theory argues that traditional IR is It shows that you are actually gender blind. Thus, feminist scholarship takes both women and gender seriously, challenging IR's basic concepts and assumptions.]]> 2022-12-22 07:59:47 UTC https://padlet.com/oguz99akkoc99/a34dhdbigyacbz2y/wish/2427300205 Waves of feminism in Turkey: Kemalist, Islamist and Kurdish women's movements oguz99akkoc99 https://padlet.com/oguz99akkoc99/a34dhdbigyacbz2y/wish/2427303376 After becoming a republic in 1923, the Turkish state initiated legal, educational and social reforms aimed at rapid modernization, urbanization and westernization. The purpose of the fledgling nation was to build a modern society. Women were given an important role in the implementation of modernization policies. Republican reforms marked a new positioning of the state for women.10 Women should propagate the values ​​of the republic as housewives and mothers who should educate future generations of "citizens" according to the nation's ideals. , in addition to their roles at home, must participate in the public sphere in the fields of education and work.11 Thus, the Kemalist project aims to support the women's movement, including access to the Internet on an equal footing with men. 12 Kemalist reforms included restrictions on traditional dress such as fez, support for Western dress codes for women and men, and adoption of the Swiss Civil Code. Thanks to this law, Turkish women were officially recognized on an equal footing with men in divorce, inheritance and custody of children. But the women's movement of the time also demanded the right to vote and vote, following the example of women's suffrage in the West. They lobbied and tried to influence Republican leaders to grant these political rights. One of her most prominent activists of the time, Nezhikhe Muhittin, even attempted to create a political party dedicated exclusively to women's suffrage and suffrage.
It is also possible to observe a reflection of the institutionalization of the movement in relation to the reorganization of state organizations. In 1990, a department was set up by the Prime Minister in charge of promoting the rights and status of women in society. Today, in 2009, there is another ministry, the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family, and within the ministry is the Directorate General for the Status of Women, which promotes research and projects on women's issues and issues. Responsible for setting up and operating. The Turkish state has also signed important international instruments and conventions on the elimination of discrimination against women, such as the Beijing Declaration, the Platform for Action and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW).]]> 2022-12-22 08:06:10 UTC https://padlet.com/oguz99akkoc99/a34dhdbigyacbz2y/wish/2427303376 1- What does Rousseau believe to be natural characterstics for men and women? 2- What kind of education and marriage he sees fit for women? 3- How does he justify his arguments? oguz99akkoc99 https://padlet.com/oguz99akkoc99/a34dhdbigyacbz2y/wish/2427307938
For Rousseau, these questions of reason and how humans are naturally comparable and inadequate, if they are inadequate at all, are important to his larger philosophical inquiry. To be his criticism of contemporary world's problems, he must show that some of these kinds of inequality endemic to society are as a matter of fact not physical and can thus be remedied. His decisions and larger line of thinking in the statement are laid out in the discussion on difference, But the fundamental force of his statement is that cause difference as we know it does not survive in this state of nature. As a matter of fact, the single sort of physical difference, according to Rousseau, is the personal difference that is among men in the state of world who may exist approximately able to provide for themselves according to their physical attributes.
Some critics think that women should be submissive to men, while others claim that Rousseau writes ironically. Some point to Emile's fundamental contradictions regarding women and education. In this work, Rousseau proposes that women are responsible for educating young people, while arguing that women are irrational. "All women's education must go hand in hand with men's education, to please them, to serve them, to be loved and respected by them, to educate them from an early age. Women themselves How can women educate even small children if they lack the ability to think? Rousseau's view of women is said to have become more complex as he aged. In Confessions, written later in his life, he credits several women with helping him gain access to the intellectual circles of society. played a role in his own development.]]> 2022-12-22 08:15:43 UTC https://padlet.com/oguz99akkoc99/a34dhdbigyacbz2y/wish/2427307938 Feminsit Foreign Policy oguz99akkoc99 https://padlet.com/oguz99akkoc99/a34dhdbigyacbz2y/wish/2438331837 Although it does not differ much, according to the text, feminist ideology is thought to have effects on the foreign policies of their countries. The existence of this effect and area can be attributed to three reasons from different perspectives. to ensure that the necessary funding is provided to achieve gender equality, and as a result of this movement, to ensure that the necessary funds are provided for the movements and purposes of feminist groups and their communities, and finally, to ensure that they are treated meticulously in stages such as evaluation. In the continuation of this point, thoughts and explanations about the correct explanation of the term feminist are also included. In other words, it would not be wrong to say that feminism focuses more on the rights and equality of women and men, that is, a kind of gender equality, rather than the idea that it is only for women. From another perspective, it can be said that she has been working not only on gender equality, but also on race, color and class differences. the continuation of this can be added the idea that states should act by adopting the definition of feminist foreign policy thoroughly.]]> 2023-01-09 19:25:30 UTC https://padlet.com/oguz99akkoc99/a34dhdbigyacbz2y/wish/2438331837 What kind of feminist contrubiton Fiona Robinson makes to our understanding of human security? What is feminist about this approach? What benefits we can gain from her approach? oguz99akkoc99 https://padlet.com/oguz99akkoc99/a34dhdbigyacbz2y/wish/2438384659 The importance of interpersonal care networks for people's sense of safety at home and in their communities is emphasized by feminist security theory, along with the impact of gender, race, class, and location on the evolution of security discourse. The fact that women handle the majority of the world's care labor is an important but understudied aspect of political and economic life on a global scale that has an impact on everyone's ability to live and feel safe on a daily basis. Additionally, she believes it's crucial to consider the risk that discussing people's safety may result in more conventional security measures like armed guards, which may make people feel even less comfortable.She agrees that security discourses may have an impact by "identifying" security issues and 'creating enemies, and that security measures might be viewed as "government tactics. Her argument does not remain at the level of discourse after some first thought. It uses a feminist methodology which is by definition critical instead of an empiricist epistemology to shed light on previously hidden aspects of human social relations. She argues that we recast human security as a liberal discourse that regulates, rather than as a means of defending individuals' rights. Despite their variations, current strategies for ensuring human security share a common trait: a disdain for the values and practices of providing and receiving care. This disrespect is a result of their emphasis on the "ungendered" human being as the fundamental benchmark for human security and the normative framework based on rights that serves as its foundation. Critical, feminist ethics of care provide an alternative relational ontology-based normative framework for human security that allows for the critical analysis of relationships between gender and race.]]> 2023-01-09 20:02:57 UTC https://padlet.com/oguz99akkoc99/a34dhdbigyacbz2y/wish/2438384659