The Caste and feudal systems both arrange the people from the one with the most power. The Shudras are like the freemen while the untouchable are like the Villeins. The brahmas are like the kings and Kshatriya are like the soldiers as they are the ones who protect and serve the king. The Kshatriyas are the warriors of the caste system of india

Both the systems are ranking from the most power to least power people, one more similarity between both is that the peasants are treated very poorly. The Kshatriyas in the Caste system is almost the same to the knights in the feudal system, as both have one purpose and it is to fight for the land, be the warriors and fight for the king.

anushka- I think that there are a few untouchable people in both the tables.There are very few kings and a lot of poor people.

In the feudal system, you might be born a noble or a peasant.In the caste system, you might be born a priest or a worker.Your group decided what you could do in life.

They hardly get any payment. Dalit girls are forced into prostitution. They are never allowed to become economically stable. They are exposed to disease and health issues. The Kshatriyas give protection to the Nobles and in exchange they pay taxes. They are not offered any education. If you don't stay loyal in both the cast systems you get executed.

Another simililarity is that the people are kind of the same. Like the Shudras are the Peasents. They are both involved in the primary sector, like agriculture, farming, animal husbandry, ect. The Vaishas are the common people who do normal jobs, like doctors teachers, ect. The shatriyas are the soldiers, who fight for their country or place. The Brahmins are like the Monarch, so they have the most control and power over the land.

The feudal system starts with the king, then the lords, then knights then peasants. The Varna system considered religious leaders as their top priority, therefore the Varna system started with the Brahmins, then the Kshatriyas, Vaishyas, the Shudras (or Dalits), and then the untouchables. The kings and lords were the same as the Kshatriyas, they could rule over any land they wished. Except the Kshatriyas put the Brahmins before them. The Vaishyas and knights also fought for the king. The freemen were like peasants except they lived with more freedom, just like the shudras. And the untouchables and slaves where the same.

In the feudal system there are kings, then lords, knights and then peasants. The caste system has Bramins then Kshatriyas, vashyas and shudras. The ksahtriyas are similar to the knights and lords whereas the brahmins and kings are treated with the most respect. The shudras are like the peasants and are treated with the least respect.

In both of the systems, the rankings are based on the most to leat power and there are brahmins like kings because they have the most power and then in the pyramid for both of the systems comes the kshatriyas or in the more english or renaissance way nobles, aristocracy, lords, and religious leaders and then the vaishas which are the common people and in the middle ages it is knights and military figures they have to come to the lords immediately after the have been called and then lastly comes the shudras which for the renaissance are peasants or serfs.

But one thing that the renaissance feudal system doesn't have and the varna system has is the dalits which are called the "untouchables" it is really horrible becuase they shoudnt discriminate people based on their wealth and how they rank on the hierarchy.

thank you

^{Indian feudalism was divided on a caste-basis such as Brahmanas, Kshatriya, Vaishaya and Shudras, while European feudalism was divided on the basis of class as in nobility, clergy and commoners. The systems had similar characteristics, i.e., they both had four categories of people with the same pattern, which defined what they did and served the same purpose. The two systems had untouchables, people considered unclean, and they did the same unclean jobs like leather tuning.}