How can you see your institution being involved with MLML? by

petradekens — 2025-02-14 17:42:22 UTC

What areas of research does your institution view as potential collaborations?

petradekens — 2025-02-14 17:44:52 UTC

What resources at MLML would bring value to your institution?

2025-02-14 20:47:21 UTC

Depending on the closure of RTC, the seawater system could be helpful to some faculty research activities.

2025-02-14 20:47:53 UTC

Promote combined training opportunities, resource sharing, and communication of relevant issues.

2025-02-14 20:48:34 UTC

The ability to bring students on trips to Monterey and the accessibility to places like Elkhorn Slough makes MLML attractive.

2025-02-14 20:49:11 UTC

We intersect on a # of infrastructure fronts, such as library, seawater system, adjacent water front properties, etc.

michaellee38 — 2025-02-14 20:49:29 UTC

Lots of EB faculty have research interests potentially allied with the focus of MLML and its facilities - fieldwork (EESC/BIOL), research (e.g. Oikawa - wetlands, Evans -shellfish, Lee - aquaculture). Part will depend on fees for services model that the old GB was wrestling with under the consortium model transition.

2025-02-14 20:49:49 UTC

Joint R&D is also possible

2025-02-14 20:50:18 UTC

Being able to explore the dune and salt marsh areas at some of the properties would be valuable in and of themselves.