<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Learning engagement 1 (Harry HUGHES) by Harry HUGHES</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/hhughes80/9xbmg4j9nbelj839</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2025-07-03 08:30:44 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-07-03 23:59:03 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Activities to prepare students for the oral</title>
         <author>FeiyangTang</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hhughes80/9xbmg4j9nbelj839/wish/3509485450</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Hi, everyone. Here are my ideas on those activities. I am not that experienced so I am willing to share my ideas and I hope that I can learn more from the group. It is a little bit late. Sorry for that, as I cannot watch the video of the instructions. I just graduated from Uni so I am expecting your pictures and ideas.</p><p><strong>1. Informal Chat</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Advantages</strong>：</p><ul><li><p>Immerses in natural context, helping students acquire colloquial expressions (e.g., "gonna", "wanna") without pressure.</p></li><li><p>Enables instant feedback via non-verbal cues (e.g., frowning to detect misunderstanding).</p></li></ul></li><li><p><strong>Disadvantages</strong>：</p><ul><li><p>Risks normalizing fragmented language (e.g., elliptical sentences like "Wanna coffee?").</p></li><li><p>Hinders deep thinking due to random topic shifts.</p></li></ul></li></ul><p><strong>2. Group Formats</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Pairs</strong>：</p><ul><li><p><strong>Advantages</strong>：50% speaking time per person, ideal for building confidence in weak speakers.</p></li><li><p><strong>Disadvantages</strong>：Limited to two perspectives, lacks diversity.</p></li></ul></li><li><p><strong>Small groups (3-5)</strong>：</p><ul><li><p><strong>Advantages</strong>：Roles like note-taker foster collaboration; multi-turn dialogues deepen ideas.</p></li><li><p><strong>Disadvantages</strong>：Extroverts may dominate, sidelining introverts.</p></li></ul></li><li><p><strong>Whole-class</strong>：</p><ul><li><p><strong>Advantages</strong>：Broadens idea exchange; simulates academic conference scenarios.</p></li><li><p><strong>Disadvantages</strong>：Uneven participation; 30% students may stay silent.</p></li></ul></li></ul><p><strong>3. Organized Procedures</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Spider web discussion</strong>：</p><ul><li><p><strong>Advantages</strong>：Visualizes thinking for logical structuring.</p></li><li><p><strong>Disadvantages</strong>：Time-consuming to draw, reduces discussion depth.</p></li></ul></li><li><p><strong>Socratic seminars</strong>：</p><ul><li><p><strong>Advantages</strong>：Cultivates critical thinking via chain questioning.</p></li><li><p><strong>Disadvantages</strong>：Requires pre-reading; unprepared students struggle.</p></li></ul></li><li><p><strong>Formal debate</strong>：</p><ul><li><p><strong>Advantages</strong>：Trains rigorous argumentation with data citation.</p></li><li><p><strong>Disadvantages</strong>：Restricted by rules, lacks improvisational flexibility.</p></li></ul></li></ul><p><strong>4. Stimulus-to-interaction</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Student presentation + Q&amp;A</strong>：</p><ul><li><p><strong>Advantages</strong>：Focuses attention through question preparation.</p></li><li><p><strong>Disadvantages</strong>：High pressure on presenters may cause 卡顿.</p></li></ul></li><li><p><strong>Video + discussion</strong>：</p><ul><li><p><strong>Advantages</strong>：Multi-modal input enhances comprehension (e.g., documentary data analysis).</p></li><li><p><strong>Disadvantages</strong>：Boring videos lead to superficial talks.</p></li></ul></li></ul><p><strong>5. Role-played interactions</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Scenario role-play (as self)</strong>：</p><ul><li><p><strong>Advantages</strong>：Natural language use in hypothetical contexts (e.g., airport customs).</p></li><li><p><strong>Disadvantages</strong>：Limited to personal perspectives, lacks professional role depth.</p></li></ul></li><li><p><strong>Panel of experts</strong>：</p><ul><li><p><strong>Advantages</strong>：Information gap drives collaborative learning across domains.</p></li><li><p><strong>Disadvantages</strong>：Requires extensive pre-research, increasing workload.</p></li></ul></li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-07-03 08:30:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hhughes80/9xbmg4j9nbelj839/wish/3509485450</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Teaching Oral Interaction to Students</title>
         <author>hhughes80</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hhughes80/9xbmg4j9nbelj839/wish/3509967516</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone! Here are my ideas on the activities listed out in the screencast and then some additional ideas of my own to help with teaching Oral Interaction.</p><p><br/></p><p><strong>Informal Chat</strong></p><p><br/></p><p>I think that informal chats are the backbone of learning language as this is where students will get to see the daily interactions between people and get to practice it for themselves. It allows for plenty of meaning and variation of language to be discovered and discussed and is something I implement in all of my classes</p><p><br/></p><p><strong>Disadvantages</strong></p><p><br/></p><p>The biggest disadvantage of an informal chat is that, well, it's informal, so unless we are policing and ensuring that everyone is using correct terms and speaking conventions, it can reinforce incorrect uses of language through conversation.</p><p><br/></p><p><strong>Formal Debate</strong></p><p><br/></p><p>I love having debates in class because it is an entirely new way for students to approach a task and gives them a chance to practice formal writing, speaking and responding. It is a great way for students to collaborate and work together to create a formal argument</p><p><br/></p><p><strong>Disadvantages</strong></p><p><br/></p><p>One of the biggest disadvantages of a formal debate is that students may only focus on their statements and not listen to the opposing teams views, and we end up with 2 speeches rather than a debate. Furthermore, if every student is not speaking in the debate, as a teacher, we may not be evaluating every student's speaking ability which is a critical flaw</p><p><br/></p><p><strong>Role Play Roles </strong></p><p><br/></p><p>This is one that I do not do often as I just hadn't considered incorporating it into my classes thus far. That being said, I can see it being a great way to teach students about the appropriate tone and register required for various text types or roles. Take for example, a CEO and an office employee, the employee would have to consider how they would speak to their boss/higher up and therefore change their tone and language</p><p><br/></p><p><strong>Disadvantages </strong></p><p><br/></p><p>This task really requires students to think on their feet and respond to what the other person is saying to them. I can imagine that some students will feel quite "put on the spot" and struggle to come up with responses. Furthermore, students need to really know the roles before hand before carrying out this task and if they are not fully aware of the conventions behind the role it can easily lead to confusion.</p><p><br/></p><p><strong>Role Play Situations</strong></p><p><br/></p><p>This one is really interesting because I can see how students would be engaged in a task like this. If it is a common situation, then students will likely have seen it before and can feel more comfortable in carrying out this role play. It also allows for students to be themselves in the roleplay, not requiring much research or preparation beforehand.</p><p><br/></p><p><strong>Disadvantages </strong></p><p><br/></p><p>I suppose the biggest disadvantage of role play situations is that there are many situations where students will be unaware of how they would proceed and may just end up with them saying, "I don't know what I would do." or feeling awkward if given an unfamiliar situation.</p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><strong>My activities </strong></p><p><br/></p><p><strong>The Dinner Table</strong></p><p><br/></p><p>I love this activity, we have all the students gathered around a large table like we are having dinner together and we just let dialogue flow. If it is a group that is more shy or reticent to speak, then I tell them to speak directly to the person across from them for X amount of minutes about any topic before asking what they're speaking about. Usually groups are a bit awkward at first but once they begin talking about a topic the conversation flows. The reason it's a dinner table is because as conversation begins to flow, people can just drop into other people's chats and contribute. At the end of the activity I usually have students recount what other students spoke about as a way of checking engagement.</p><p><br/></p><p><strong>You're the expert</strong></p><p><br/></p><p>I give students time to study and research any topic that interests them and then they prepare a short speech, presentation or any form of communication to tell us about the topic they like. For all intents and purposes, this person is the "Expert' of the topic and we are all students. Students are encouraged to ask questions about the topic to the "Expert" who has to answer them. It's a great way for students to develop their logical thinking skills and how to structure their language. It also allows for students to develop their question asking skills as audience members. </p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-07-03 23:59:01 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hhughes80/9xbmg4j9nbelj839/wish/3509967516</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
