Homework: Define strict liability, and give examples by Maxine Brimblecombe https://padlet.com/maxine_brim/homework5nov en-us 2014-10-28 12:23:23 UTC 2017-05-17 09:25:15 UTC hello@padlet.com (David.)  https://padlet.com/maxine_brim/homework5nov/wish/40649868 A criminal offence that does not necessiraly require "Mens Rea" elements in the "Actus Reus" itself or most of its elements. R v Howells (1977) QB. 614

]]> 2014-11-11 21:16:01 UTC https://padlet.com/maxine_brim/homework5nov/wish/40649868 Diana. Strict liability  https://padlet.com/maxine_brim/homework5nov/wish/40650528 These are crimes that require no proof of means in relation to one or more offences

Gammon (Hong Kong ) Ltd v Altony- General of Hong Kong 1985 AC.

]]> 2014-11-11 21:28:14 UTC https://padlet.com/maxine_brim/homework5nov/wish/40650528 Rafi https://padlet.com/maxine_brim/homework5nov/wish/40657201 Strict Libility are the crimes that does not require Men's Rea, but at least one or more elects of "Actus Rea".

* R v Blake (1996), The Times, August 14.

* R v K (2001), UKHL 41, House of Lords

]]> 2014-11-11 23:18:38 UTC https://padlet.com/maxine_brim/homework5nov/wish/40657201 Jonny https://padlet.com/maxine_brim/homework5nov/wish/40704295 A crime committed does not require a men's rea or actus reus for one to be convicted.

]]> 2014-11-12 11:12:42 UTC https://padlet.com/maxine_brim/homework5nov/wish/40704295