<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Topic  2: Should Apple have resisted  FBI pressure to hack an iPhone?  by JAMES SAN</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/8jsan1841/9u916ws4w4wq</link>
      <description>By: Eric Dam, Vincent Lam, Andrew Pacillas, and James San</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-02-26 18:34:59 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2018-03-02 21:59:32 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>8vlam831</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/8jsan1841/9u916ws4w4wq/wish/236074204</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>First of all, Apple refused to work with the FBI because they were trying to protect the value of their brand. According to the Article "the software the FBI wanted Apple to create would create problems for phone owners, forcing Apple to create such software would have violated the rights of the company and its stakeholders."This is important to consider because Apple's image would be shattered</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-02-27 18:41:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/8jsan1841/9u916ws4w4wq/wish/236074204</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>8jsan1841</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/8jsan1841/9u916ws4w4wq/wish/236082058</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. The government can't force Apple to give up information<br><br>2. Apple didn't have the information that the FBI was seeking(p.4) <br><br>3. Protect the value of their brand(p.10) </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-02-27 18:51:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/8jsan1841/9u916ws4w4wq/wish/236082058</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>8apac180</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/8jsan1841/9u916ws4w4wq/wish/236087172</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Finally, the most important reason why Apple was correct in refusing to help the FBI is because what they were trying to do interfered with our fourth amendment. In fact, according to the article, individuals have the right to possess information without having to share it with the government. Apple has the right to provide products that help individuals protect this right. To elaborate, Apple is helping citizens protect their rights by not allowing the FBI to freely break into apple user's phones.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-02-27 18:58:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/8jsan1841/9u916ws4w4wq/wish/236087172</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>8edam094</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/8jsan1841/9u916ws4w4wq/wish/236088361</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Some opponents might argue that the government cant force Apple to give up information. However that is not true. In fact, helping the FBI unlock the phone can save life. According to the article it states, " Authorities in EU countries believe Islamic terrorist cells have mushroomed across Europe - ready to commit more horrendous acts they receive. Doing this can do harm rather than good. The FBI and Apple should work together and try to find a easier solution. They should do this instead of demanding Apple to override the phone.&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-02-27 18:59:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/8jsan1841/9u916ws4w4wq/wish/236088361</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>8jsan1841</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/8jsan1841/9u916ws4w4wq/wish/236091751</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Furthermore, Apple didn't have the information that the FBI was asking for. In the Newsela article, "PRO/CON: Was Apple justified in refusing to help the FBI?" they state that the FBI was seeking for information, but they claim that they never had the information that they needed. This means that the FBI is asking apple for something that they don't have; therefore Apple can't give them the information that they're asking for.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-02-27 19:04:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/8jsan1841/9u916ws4w4wq/wish/236091751</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>8apac180</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/8jsan1841/9u916ws4w4wq/wish/237121292</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Finally, the most important reason why Apple was correct in refusing to help the FBI is because what they were trying to do interfered with our fourth amendment. In fact, according to the article, individuals have the right to possess information without having to share it with the government. Apple has the right to provide products that help individuals protect this right. To elaborate, Apple is helping citizens protect their rights by not allowing the FBI to freely break into apple user's phones.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-03-01 19:05:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/8jsan1841/9u916ws4w4wq/wish/237121292</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
