To address these dilemmas, Cale could develop collaborative data-sharing agreements that protect anonymity, use aggregated or de-identified datasets(According to susan banks p97 ,deidenfication may involve removal of names,places,or other information that links data to participants), and create an independent ethics advisory group including survivor advocates. He could also apply trauma-informed consent progucedures to ensure participant wellbeing. These actions align with the SAGE Research Planner’s guidance that were addressing confidentiality as an important aspect of research. (Trish,Safa,Aliazah,Hailong,Tu Ngoc Khanh Nguyen)

It is also important to create safe environments where participants feel comfortable sharing their experiences without force or pressure. The researcher should also adapt the methodology to be culturally sensitive and respectful. For example, cultural differences can affect how informed consent is perceived and given, especially if participants come from different cultural backgrounds where the concept of consent or privacy may be interpreted differently.

Another important point is the aftercare and responsibility of the research. That the researcher should not only offer support during interviews, but also have plans for the effects of the research on the well-being of the participants. This can include follow-up contacts or referrals to long-term support resources, especially if traumatic memories have been raised. 

Additional measures are confidentiality in data storage and handling. To be extra careful about how data is handled technically to ensure sectarianism, such as encryption of audio recordings and text files or the use of secure servers, and how long data is retained according to ethical guidelines. This reduces the risk of data breaches and builds trust. (Tilde Hansson and Cornelia Selander)