Obviously, we need to admit that academic subjects play a significant role in adapting students’ careers in the future. For instance, if we want to be a marketer, studying geography, history or culture is compulsory to identify the trend of the market. The point I want to emphasize is that important subjects include based knowledge which could be beneficial for our occupations in the future.

This might be true, however, it can not be denied that learning how to make food might establish a independence skill . As a matter of fact, in modern life, covid 19 pandemic has detrimentally affected the life of citizens, which causes a dramatic death in the number of starving people, and the reason is they live alone without any knowledge of cooking, thus learning to make a simple meals could help us survive throughout the pandemic.  To clarify, soft skills such as cooking would be an important function to save us in the dilemma.

Furthermore, it is worth mentioning that learning about how to prepare food will decrease the overabundance of food in the future. This is because making a source of food needs to undergo a large quantity of process, from the first stage is finding ingredients to the last stage is evaluation of food safety. After studying this long process, the positive result is students would be raised aware of the value of food, then they will not waste food anymore

In conclusion, although learning vital subjects could be the background for students in their future job, food processing not only increases the awareness of the young generation of food but also becomes a skill that helps us to survive in difficult circumstances. For all of these reasons, I strongly believe that studying the science of food and the way to make it could bring a large amount of advantages. 

Admittedly, letting students study only important subjects at school could benefit their future. This is because studying fewer subjects means they could concentrate more on what they need to do, thus might help enhance their academic performance, especially in Asian countries which put tremendous stress on academic performance. What we need to acknowledge is that when school time is only focused on the vital subjects, students could somewhat have better academic results.

This might be true, however, studying about the science of food and how to prepare food could prepare the students for bettering in taking care of themselves. The explanation for this could be the fact that many youngsters move out at the age of 18, if they could not have the ability to cook, they might order they prepared food and junk food for the sole purpose of living through days, which could lead to many health risks. In facts, many researches proved that more than two-thirds of young people living independently do not have an acceptable cooking skill and thus having unhealthy food, a half of them have many health problems after the age of 50.

Furthermore, studying about food could be a good stress reliever for students. This is because most of important subjects at school are hectic for many students; in contrast, the subject of food could be more relaxing for them as cooking are usually a way that people ease their mind. As a matter of fact, many students reported that studying the subject of food science and food preparation is as relaxing as listen to music or doing some household chores. 

In conclusion, while studying important subjects at school could help the students focus more on the subjects, studying about food beside the principle subjects at school could help the students take better care of themselves and might be more relaxing for them. I personally think that studying the science of food and food preparation could be better for students to some extent.


Nowadays, not so many school include culinary education as part of their curriculum. However, I personally advocate that studying food preparation beside the important subjects at school could be more beneficial for students.

 

Admittedly, letting students study only important subjects at school could help improve their future career prospect, especially in Asian countries that put tremendous importance on academic performance. This is because studying fewer subjects means they could concentrate more on what they need to do, thus enhancing their academic performance. What we need to acknowledge is that when school time is only focused on the vital subjects, it is possible that students could have better academic results.

 

This might be true, but we need to acknowledge that studying about food could be a good stress reliever for students. This is because most important subjects at school are hectic for students, while the subject of food could be more relaxing for them as cooking are usually a way that people ease their mind. As a matter of fact, many students reported that studying the subject of food science and food preparation is as relaxing as listen to music or doing some household chores. 

 

More importantly, we cannot deny that studying about the science of food and how to prepare food could prepare the students for bettering in taking care of themselves. In facts, many researches proved that more than two-thirds of young people living independently in the US do not have acceptable cooking skills, which is one of the reason for the rise in obesity before the age of 50. The explanation for this could be the fact that without the ability to cook, many of us would fall into the habit of eating unhealthy food when we move out of our parents’ houses, thus learning how to prepare a healthy meal at school means we can be much fitter as adults. 

 

 

In conclusion, while studying important subjects at school could help the students focus more on the subjects, studying about food beside the principle subjects at school could help the students take better care of themselves and might be more relaxing for them. For these reasons, I firmly believe that studying the science of food and food preparation could be better for students to some extent.

Obviously, we need to admit that permitting people at a high age to work at any time can put them in a dilemma. The point I want to emphasize is that nowadays, most companies in the world choose to use advanced technology to work, and this could be an obstacle for old people because their old age does not allow them to access technology as quickly as young staff. As a matter of fact, some older Vietnamese teachers can not learn how to use communication platforms such as zoom or gg meetings to maintain their lesson, thus students have to wait for a long time for this issue. 

This might be true, however, it can not be denied that people who work at the final part of their life instead of retirement could help the development of the country. This is because the government does not have to pay the pension for old people, therefore they can use that budget for other financial support to encourage the improvement of the country. In fact, instead of paying a billions for retired people, authorities could use this large amount of money for innovating the area of economically disadvantaged people’s area, which might decrease the gap of levels in the society

Furthermore, it is worth mentioning that the contribution of old generations to the company is more effective than that of the young generation. This is because of the fact that people who at the old age have undergone an enormous number of life experiences, thus they could solve the problems faster than low-experienced staff as youngsters. For instance, in Viet Nam, the salaries of people at 45-55 years old register 2 times higher than people at 30-45 on average, due to the speed at which they accomplish their work.

In conclusion, although old people approach high-tech tools extremely slowly, they could not only work better than young generations because of their experience, but also they could contribute to the development of their country. For all of these reasons, I strongly believe that the advantages of working at any period of life time will outweigh the disadvantages. 

 

Nevertheless, it is undeniable that having versatitle knowledge relating to food might avoid the diseases are detrimental to healthy grown in children. This is because possessing  a solid understanding of food and cooking could help people to control what they are putting over in their body as weel as design a regiment on their owns. The point I want to emphasize is that learning culinary course could provide students knowledge of how to balance calories consumed from food, thus it help them grow and maintain a healthy weight and health.

 

Moreover, it is worth to mentioning that cooking imparts is a basic but important skill for your life to students’ pocket. For example, one university student would spent $50 a week on takeaways, thus if they swap this out for fresh ingredient to cook by themselves, it could save around half of their original spent.  What we have to realize is eating takeaways and fast food are remarkablely bad for your bank balance thus if having capibility to cook could cut the student bills and save tremendous amount of money.

Admittedly,traditional school curriculums can provide an individual with the strong foundation to smoothly transit into any professional enviroment. The point I want to emphasize is that we live in modern society, where everyone is very competitive with each other, and modern recruiters would only seek people who has tremendous knowledge in each field, thus acamedic study could build a firm foundation in may career. As a matter of fact,  logical thinking acquired during math lessons and critical thinking skills generated by literature are required for more nuanced problem-solving abilities in professions like …...

 

Nevertheless, it is undeniable that having versatitle knowledge relating to food might help student avoid the diseases are detrimental to healthy development. This is because possessing  a solid understanding of food and cooking could help people to control what they are putting in their body as weel as design a regiment on their owns. The point I want to emphasize is that learning culinary course could provide students knowledge of how to balance calories consumed from food, thus it help them grow and maintain a healthy weight and health.

 

Moreover, it is worth to mentioning that cooking imparts students a basic but important skill for an independent life. For example, one university student could spent $50 a week on takeaways, but if they could make their food, they could save about half of that on ingredients, not to mention the health benefits.  What we have to realize that is eating takeaways and fast food are remarkablely detrimental for your bank balance, thus having the capibility to cook could cut the student bills and save tremendous amount of money.

Obviously, we need to admit that promoting a healthy life for each citizen could decrease other funding which is related to the medical field. The point I want to emphasize is that if the common public have a healthy lifestyle, they will establish a significant immune background to avoid them from any issues, thus the quantity of patients could decrease extremely. As a result, the government does not have to provide financial support for pharmaceutical production or advanced technology. Take Cuba as an example, a country where funding for organic products by billions of money, has to pay a third for curing people who have problems with their digestive system. 

Furthermore, it is worth mentioning that a life without any health problems will bar people from strange issues. For instance, Denmark, which has the highest number of gyms in the world, has one of the lowest rates of respiratory disease in the world, approximately lower than 10%. This is because the environment where healthy people live is not suitable for the uncontrollable growth of viruses or infection. On the other hand, China has cutting-edge technology in medicine but with the highest pollution rate in the world, this is the origin of covid 19 which is a pandemic. 

In conclusion, facilitating the development of healthy lifestyles not only reduces finance for medication but also prevents people from strange pandemic. For all of these reasons, I strongly believe that spending money promoting people to stay healthy is vital in certain societies. 

Nowadays, some governments channel a large amount of money for encouraging healthy lifestyle instead of treating people who are already ill. From my point of view, I definitely advocate that this policy could bring more benefits than drawbacks.

 

Obviously, we need to admit that promoting a healthy lifestyle for each citizen could decrease the amount of money that we have to spend on things related to the medical field. The point I want to emphasize is that if the common public have a healthy lifestyle, they will establish a firm basic immune system to keep them from many common medical issues, thus the quantity of patients could remarkably decrease. As a result, the government will have to provide less financial support for pharmaceutical production or advanced technology. As a matter of fact, the government of Cuba has invested billions into the production of safe organic food, and hence their people see a third of the rate of digestive diseases compared to Western Countries like the US or France. 

 

 

In conclusion, facilitating the development of healthy lifestyles not only reduces finance for medication but also prevents people from strange pandemic. For all of these reasons, I strongly believe that spending money promoting people to stay healthy is vital in certain societies.

Obviously, we need to acknowledge that the authorities could not comprehensively examine the safety of food. Take the Sars pandemic in Africa as an example, a huge number of countries import food created by livestocks from this continent causing the dramatic increase of infected patients. The point I want to emphasize is that governments could not pay all of their attention to only import due to a huge quantity of sectors, thus some goods could be missed in the examination. The potential risk could be that widespread issues could not be controlled. 

Furthermore, it is worth mentioning that the government tendency of imported food could decline the development of domestic agriculture. The basis of this could be the fact food which was imported from developed countries is always nourished in the high-tech environment, thus the value of this kind of food will be more high-quality than others. As a matter of fact, some Western products such as beef or pork are often a choice of customers because these have 2 times higher nutritional value than domestic products. To clarify, inland companies which manufacture agricultural products can not compete with foreign companies then they would potentially go bankrupt. 

In conclusion, the development of importing food not only spreads the issues for countries, but also decreases the improvement of domestic companies. For all of these reasons, I strongly believe that this enhancement is not beneficial for countries. 

 

Admittedly, the modern work environment might be tremendously competitive that the elderly could have difficulties to adapt. This is because when people get older, their mind and body could not function as good as the youngsters that they could get tired in fast-paced work environment. What we need to acknowledge is that the old people health condition could be an obstacle that they could find difficulties in adapting to the modern work environment. 

 

This might be true, however, letting the people working at an old age could reduce the probability of Alzheimer. The explanation for this could be the fact that when they are working, the elderly get to remember many details of their work, which could tremendously stimulate their memories, thus result to the reduction in the likelihood of Alzheimer disease. Many researches proved that there are about two-thirds of the number of elderly who keep working at the age of entire have less than 10% of having Alzheimer disease. 

 

Furthermore, it is worth mentioning that allowing older people to work at any age that they want could help governments save a tremendous amount of money. This is because the government does not have to pay the pension for the elderly; therefore they can spend this fund to develop the countries. If I recall correctly, Vietnamese authorities imposed the policies of letting the older people keep working in 2019, so that in 2020, with the Covid pandemic widespread, this countries’ authorities channeled the fund that they should have paid for pension to help people who were unemployed due to the laid-off policies imposed in many companies.

 

In conclusion, the policies of allowing the elderly keep working at their final part of their life could make them stressful; otherwise, these policies might help the older people reduce the probability of Alzheimer disease and contribute to develop the countries. From my point of view, I advocate that allowing the elderly keep working at the age of entire could be beneficial for both the older people and the countries.

Nowadays, old people in many countries are allowed to work to any given age. Personally, I advocate that this trend could have more benefits than drawbacks. 

 

Admittedly, the modern work environment might be so tremendously competitive that the elderly could have difficulties in adapting. This is because when people get older, their mind and body could not function as well as that of those younger, therefore they could get tired much more easily in a modern work environment. What we need to acknowledge is that constantly trying to shoulder the pressure of modern work could cause severe physical and mental problem for these workers’ already frail health.  

 

This might be true, however, as long as there is moderation, letting the people work in their old age could reduce the risk of many diseases associated with old age like depression, senility or aldz…. The explanation for this could be the fact that when they are working, the elderly get to socialize with their colleagues and remember many details of their work, which could tremendously stimulate their memories, thus result in a reduction in the possibility of contracting these diseases. If I recall correctly, many researches has proven that working pass 70 leads to a significant reduction in the possibility of having Alzheimer’s disease. 

 

Furthermore, it is worth mentioning that allowing senior citizens to work at any age that they want could help governments save a tremendous amount of money. This is because the government does not have to pay the pension for the elderly until they retire; therefore the longer these people work, the more money the authorities will have to fund other policies. If I recall correctly, Vietnamese authorities imposed the policies of letting the older people keep working pass 65 in 2019, and as a result in 2020, with the widespread of the Covid pandemic, this country’s authorities channeled the fund that they should have paid for pension to help people who were unemployed due to the laid-off policies imposed in many companies.

 

In conclusion, while the policy of allowing the elderly keep working at their final part of their life could make them stressful, it has been proven help the older people reduce the probability of Alzheimer disease and contribute to develop the countries. For these reasons, I strongly believe that allowing the elderly keep working at the age of entire could be beneficial for both the older people and the countries.

First of all, we need to admit that working might be the way for old people to have pleasure. This is because instead of staying at home, the elderly can go to work and satisfy their social needs, they can chat with co-workers and make them feel happier than just staying at home. In contrast, the aged who do not go to work, just at home and do household chores may feel lonely, even depressed. If I recall correctly, according to a research, retirement can increase the chances of suffering from depression by around 40%. 

Moreover, we need to acknowledge that allowing old people to work may increase the economy. The explanation for this could be the fact that old workers usually have more experience in the job, thus they can increase the productivity of their work, which will increase output and sales to increase the economy. Besides that, veteran workers can become a supervisor or an instructor to support young workers to complete their job successfully. Conversely, if experienced employees retire, the new and young employees might struggle with the job which might lead to poor productivity and economical disadvantages. 

In conclusion, allowing old people to work whenever they want can avoid mental health problems and with their experience they can help to increase the economy. So for me, the advantages of old people going to work outweigh the disadvantages.  

Traditionally, old people often stay at home when they are at retirement age. However, some countries allow the elderly to work whenever they want. From my points of view, I think this policy has more benefits than drawbacks

 

First of all, we need to admit that working might be a way for old people to have pleasure. This is because when they are allowed to work to any age they want, instead of staying at home, the elderly can go to work and satisfy their social needs or just chat with co-workers, which will make them feel happier than just staying at home. In contrast, the aged who do not go to work and just at home and do household chores may feel lonely, even depressed. If I recall correctly, according to a research, retirement can increase the chances of suffering from depression by around 40%. 

 

Moreover, it is also worth mentioning that allowing old people to work may significantly improve the economy. The explanation for this could be the fact that old workers usually have more experience in the job, thus they can increase the productivity of their work, which will improve output and sales for companies they work in. Besides that, veteran workers can become a supervisor or an instructor to support young workers to complete their job successfully. Conversely, if experienced employees retire, the new and young employees might struggle with the job which might lead to poor productivity and economical disadvantages. 

 

In conclusion, allowing old people to work whenever they want can avoid mental health problems and with their experience they can help to increase the economy. So for me, the advantages of old people going to work outweigh the disadvantages.  

Obviously, it is true that letting the elders keep pursue their current work might cause them health issue. This is because some old people tend to not drop out of the company because they having economic disadvantaged or have to make more income in order to take care of their children and wives. For example, a man who is in poor financial condition will continue to work endlessly and refuse to go to the hospital or go to retirement even if he having a critical health issue. 

However, we need to admit that allowing elderly to continue they job can ensures the income to maintain their daily life. The basis that I want to point out is it take significant amount of money for people to pay not only for essential supply like food, electricity and water bill but sometime entertainment that can cost quite a decent budget, thus the retirement salary is usually quite low. As the matter of fact, a standard retirement payment in Viet Nam which is usually around 3 million dong just barely cover the most basic needs like electricity and water. 

Furthermore, these experience workers can also pass out some of their skills to the new employee. What we have to realize is that an elderly with 20 to 30 years of experience in his job would be a better teacher than an expert in the company training program. For instant, young employees who are guarantee to have trouble when their work in the first day could receive assist and advice from the old employee who know exactly how to do they job. 

In conclusion,

Obviously, it is true that letting the elderly keep pursuing their career might cause them health issues. Elderly = not physically & mentally fit to work. 

 

However, we need to admit that allowing senior citizens to continue they job can ensure they have the income to maintain their daily life. The thing that I want to point out is that retirement pension is often not adequate, because these people have pay not only for essential supply like food, electricity and water bill, but also other necessity for a good life like entertainment or travel. As a matter of fact, a standard retirement payment in Viet Nam ,which is usually around 3 million dong, just barely cover the most basic needs like electricity and water, and leave people with no resource for…. 

 

Furthermore, these experienced workers can also share some of their skills to the new employee. What we have to realize is that an elderly with 20 to 30 years of experience who works with us every day would be a much better teacher than an expert who trains us for a mere few days a year. More specific 

However , these imported foods have many drawbacks that we can’t ignore . What we have to realize is that preservatives are often added to imported foods to make sure that it will not spoil during the transportation and when we eat too much imported foods from other countries , it may affect our health . For example , there are many food poisonings and most of them are caused by the preservatives in these imported foods . Moreover , the act of transporting food from a country to another is often done by airplanes,trains and it needs a lot of fuel - which is highly detrimental to the environment . 

On the one hand, we need to admit that imported food helps people have more choices. The point i want to emphasize is the fact that the public will be able to enjoy different foods that are not cultivated in their country and they can mix many ingredients from other countries to make new delicious dishes. More specific evidence…

 

However , these imported ingredients could carry a lot of health risks. What we have to realize is that preservatives are often added to imported food to make sure that it will not spoil during the transportation and when we take in too much of these chemicals, I can may detrimental affect our health . More specific evidence… 

 

Moreover, importing food from abroad will make consumers forget about domestic products. I want to emphasize that customers always want to try new things, so they will focus more on imported products from abroad, and this inadvertently makes domestically produced products unable to compete with imported products. In fact, at supermarkets, it is not difficult for us to come across large and beautiful stalls to display imported goods and buyers always tend to choose food at this stall.

 

Admittedly, the modern work environment might be so intensely competitive that the elderly could struggle to adjust. This is because when people get older, their minds and bodies could not perform as effectively as those of the young, and as a result, they might become tired / exhausted much more easily in a modern work environment. I have read several studies showing that the employees aged 30-45 years old could work from 8-10 hours a day on average, whilst those in their 60s above, are only able to perform about 5 hours a day due to their health limits.

 

Nevertheless, it is undeniable that people who work in the later years rather than retiring can tremendously contribute to the country’s progress. The point I want to emphasize is that the government does not have to pay pensions for senior citizens who still work; therefore,  they could funnel this budget into promoting the development of the country. 

 

Moreover, it is worth mentioning that allowing experienced workers to continue their careers might significantly improve their mental health. The explanation for this could be the fact that work environments generally facilitate the engagement of more cognitively challenging and simulating activities, (work environments generally make people engage in more cognitively challenging and simulating activities), thus by working the elderly could exercise their mind more than staying in retirement. On the contrary, it would be easy to see how mental health problems could arise in seniors who spend the most time at home.

 

In conclusion, although old people keep working at the final part of their life could struggle with the competition in the modern work environment, however,  it could tremendously contribute or the country’s budget and also improve the mental health in old age. For these reasons, I strongly believed that the benefits of working at senior age will outweigh the drawback.

 

First of all, investing public money on consolidating a healthy lifestyle could help save a tremendous amount of money for the governments. This is because having a healthy lifestyle means having better immune systems, which could help people avoid health problems. In fact, Vietnamese has started encouraging a healthy lifestyle for the dwellers since 2017, thus they could save roughly a hundred billion VND annually, which could be invested in developing the country. In contrast, Indonesian authorities disregarded the policy of promoting a healthy lifestyle; therefore spend approximately a thousand billion of Indonesian rupiah for average each year.

Furthermore, encouraging a healthy lifestyle could help with the growth in people’s living standard. The explanation for this could be the fact that promoting health condition might help increase work productivity, thus people could work less but earn more. Many researches have reported that people with better health, thus higher productivity usually have twice higher incomes compared to people with frail health, as well as lower productivity. What we need to acknowledge is that governments should invest money in promoting a healthy lifestyle, which could be beneficial to the citizens, as well as the countries.

In conclusion, consolidating a healthy lifestyle could not only contribute to save a incredible fund for the countries, but also help enhance people’s living standard. For these reasons, I personally advocate that the policies of promoting a healthy lifestyle instead of spending money for curing people who are in illness could do good for the nations. 

It is thought that the governments should channel public funds to encourage a healthy lifestyle so as to prevent illness rather than using them for treating people’s illness. Personally, I strongly believe that this policy could be beneficial for the community.

 

First of all, we need to acknowledge that encouraging / promoting a healthy lifestyle could help save a tremendous amount of money for the governments. This is because having a healthy lifestyle means having better immune systems, which could help people avoid health serious problems that can be taxing / put unnecessary pressure on public health system. In fact, the Vietnamese government has implemented a program to promote  a daily jogging habit among its inhabitants (dwellers / resident / inhabitant) since 2017, and during the same period their public health insurance expense also dropped significantly. I want to emphasize that….

 

Furthermore, encouraging a healthy lifestyle could help with improving / the economy. The explanation for this could be the fact that promoting health condition might help increase work productivity, thus people could work less but earn more. Many researches have reported that people with better health, thus higher productivity usually have incomes twice as high compared to people with frail health, which tend to lead to lower productivity. In contrast,…..

 

In conclusion, consolidating a healthy lifestyle could not only contribute to save a incredible fund for the countries, but also help enhance people’s living standard. For these reasons, I personally advocate that the policies of promoting a healthy lifestyle instead of spending money for curing people who are in illness could do good for the nations.

 

First of all, it is undeniable that customers could have a better experience when they buy food brought in from another country. This is because when food a being brought in the local country, its quality is always examined, and only the best products make it to our market, which means they tend to be of better quality than those locally produced. For example….. In contrast,……

 

Furthermore, it is worth mentioning that importing food from abroad would significantly provide a wider range of options and expose citizens to delicacies that are sometimes unavailable in their home country. For example, Laos. I want to emphasize that this is of tremendous utility for countries with the tremendous populations and limited arable land. What we have to realize is that as a result, previously starving residents now have more access to nutritional food thus increasing both life expectancy and quality of life. 

 

In conclusion, the development of importing food does not only provide the customer better food quality thus it also assists in the development of economic growth. For these reasons, I strongly advocate that the benefits of this enhancement will outweigh the drawback.

Obviously, we need to admit that preventing the problems before it starts to happens can bring more benefits to the society. The fact that I want to emphasize is why not acting before the issue can even happen, thus this solution makes the common public always in their best mood. As a matter of fact, people who having mental health problems due to stacking stress day by day would take multiple months or even years to recover to their former state. What we have to realize is that convince people to live a healthy life can ensure that they would keep on the efficiency in daily work without ever having any kind of critical physical or mental trouble. 

Furthermore, a promoting operation would have effect on all the society but not only the people who got illness. This is because when the operation is lauch,  all the people which both include illness person and healthy person gain knowledge about how to maintain a good lifestyle in order to prevent diseases. For example, making a program that encourages the citizen to have a fine health condition on the national TV channel will definitely impact all the people in the country whether they having sickness or in their best mood. Conversely, only focus offer assist for people who process ill health would do nothing benefits the rest of the society. 

In conclusion,  

(consider it adj to V)

Nowadays, some governments in the world consider it better to use public money on healthy lifestyle promoting operations rather than on developing treatment options for diseases. Personally, I strongly advocate that we should encourage people to have the best lifestyle as possible. 

 

 

Argument = preventative = more cost effective to maintain health

Explain = promote lifestyle = benefit both sick & healthy people => get more value for investment.   

 

First of all, it is undeniable that customer could have better experience when they buy food brought in from another countries. This is because when food is imported to another countries, its quality are always examined carefully, thus only the best product make it to the market. For example, American beef imported into Vietnam has to pass a myriad of regulated test to check its quality, while Vietnamese beef is under less stringent regulation . As a matter of fact, there have been many cases where the domestic beef sold is actually frozen buffalo meat processed to look like beef with harmful chemicals.

 

Furthermore, it is also worth mentioning that importing food from abroad could provide the inhabitants a wide range of options that provide them with sources of nutrients sometimes unavailable in their countries. For example, Laos, being a land-locked nation, does not have natural access to seafoods, but thanks to imported items its people still have access to the plethora of health benefits that this food source provides. The point I want to emphasize is that this is of tremendous utility for the countries which has a massive populations and limited arable land. What we have to realize is that having more access to nutritionals food can increase life expectancy and quality of life, which are essential for the development of a nation. 

 

In conclusion, the development of importing food does not only provide the customer better food quality, it also assist them chances to delicacies which are unavailable in their countries. For these reason, I strongly advocates that this enhancement could beneficial to the community.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First of all, we need to acknowledge that promoting a healthy lifestyle could help governments save a tremendous amount of money. This is because living with a healthy lifestyle could be the key to a better immune system, which could help reduce the unnecessary pressure put on public health system. If I recall correctly, in 2017, Vietnamese governments implemented a programme to encourage its inhabitants to jog more frequently, thus the average health insurance expenses in this country reduced by a third after two years. What I want to emphasis is that encouraging people take part in healthy public activities could help reduce the expenses of treatments, therefore might reduce incredible expenses for governments.

Furthermore, we need to realize that promoting a healthy lifestyle help develop the general economy. The explanation for this could be the fact that people with a healthy lifestyle thus better health could have higher work productivity in comparison with people with frail health and unhealthy lifestyle. As a matter of fact, since Vietnamese governments encouraged people to approach healthy lifestyle in 2019, people’s work productivity has doubled their productivity in the year 2017, thus the rate of Vietnamese economy development climbed by approximately 3.4% in the year 2020. In contrast, China governments disregarded the policy of promoting a healthy lifestyle in 2018, therefore encountered the reduced by around 20% in the figure of inhabitants’ work productivity, thus the slight decline by roughly 0.7% in the general economy development in 2019.

In conclusion, promoting a healthy lifestyle not only help save an incredible amount of money for the governments, but also develop the country’s general economy. From these reasons, I personally advocate that the policy of encouraging a healthy lifestyle could be generally beneficial to the society.

First of all, we need to acknowledge that foreign food contain chemicals for the purpose of better storage, thus affect consumers’ health. The explanation for this could be the fact that food could experience a period of time on planes or boats when transporting, which could make them less fresh; as a result, they might be contaminated with substances to keep fresh and look better, which could lead to a plethora of serious health problems. If I recall correctly, there was a friend of me who used to a big fan imported food as they were more exotic and tasty for him, then he once had to hospitalize due to the allergy to a preservative found in Burrito, a type of food from Mexico. In contrast, since he ate more local food, which is much fresher than imported food, he has not experience any health problems because of the foreign food. 

Furthermore, it is worth mentioning that the tendency of importing food form other part of the world could cause the rate of unemployment to increase. This is because enterprises tend to import food instead of producing food domestically, which could tremendously reduce the number of workers from the domestic food producing line. As a matter of fact, a myriad of researches have reported that since the rate of importing food in Vietnam increased by a forth in 2017, the proportion of unemployment in this country has encountered a sharp growth by a third. The point I want to emphasis is that governments should limit the amount of foreign food, which could help create more work for the employees.

In conclusion, not only does food imported from other countries could cause many health problems but it also incredibly increases the rate of joblessness. For these reasons, I personally advocate that importing food from other part of the world could bring many drawbacks.