<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>SPWA - 3B by Conor Baranski</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/conor_baranski/9p4gs0tneyuc</link>
      <description>Should it be designated, or not? </description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2017-12-08 20:57:48 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2017-12-12 20:45:12 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>SPWA</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/conor_baranski/9p4gs0tneyuc/wish/215607206</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>We think that Scotchmans Peak should be designated due to the natural resources that it produces and many activites&nbsp; that it produces such as hiking, fishing, etc.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-12 20:26:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/conor_baranski/9p4gs0tneyuc/wish/215607206</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Should the Scotchmans Peak Wilderness Area be designated as wilderness?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/conor_baranski/9p4gs0tneyuc/wish/215607439</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In our opinion, we believe that the Scotchmans Peak Wilderness Area should be designated because of the flourishing biodiversity within the protected land, and the belief that the land will be healthier for the future, as well as being the first piece of land that is federally protected.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-12 20:27:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/conor_baranski/9p4gs0tneyuc/wish/215607439</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Should the Scotchman peaks wilderness area be designated as wilderness by the US congress?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/conor_baranski/9p4gs0tneyuc/wish/215607544</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In our opinion, Scotchman Peaks wilderness area should be designated as wilderness by the US congress because of many activities and attributes that accompanies it, such as wildlife and forest areas. Due to the negative impacts of forest reservations, the promotion of a designated area can mean a "healthy, viable, and more naturally distributed wildlife populations that would enforce wilderness values."&nbsp;<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-12 20:27:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/conor_baranski/9p4gs0tneyuc/wish/215607544</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>a</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/conor_baranski/9p4gs0tneyuc/wish/215607677</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>A<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-12 20:27:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/conor_baranski/9p4gs0tneyuc/wish/215607677</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Many misconceptions have been formed over the proposed wilderness and have led to these controversies. But by examining the actual bill, one can clearly see that the bills main goal is the protection and prolonged health of the wilderness area. The bill mentions no changes to regulations or forms of shifting power to the government and outlines the many positive goals this act will promote. The proposed wilderness of Scotchman Peaks will serve as an important source of tourism to the area and protect the beautiful land for the future. The U.S. congress should designate Scotchmans as a wilderness area to secure protection and promote preservation.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/conor_baranski/9p4gs0tneyuc/wish/215608086</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-12 20:29:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/conor_baranski/9p4gs0tneyuc/wish/215608086</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/conor_baranski/9p4gs0tneyuc/wish/215608150</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>No the Scotchman's Peak should not be designated as a wilderness in eyes of the congress. There isn’t a need for it to become protected by congress because with the protection from the Forest service is the same as how it would be except no motorized vehicles but there are rules already against motorized vehicles. &nbsp;</div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-12 20:29:16 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/conor_baranski/9p4gs0tneyuc/wish/215608150</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Scotchman Peaks Wilderness area should be designated by Congress.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/conor_baranski/9p4gs0tneyuc/wish/215608224</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I think it should because it will not designate any land that isn't already protected or isn't in the State of Idaho, It will preserve the untouched northwestern beauty seen on the Scotchman Peaks, and it will not have  any significant negative effects on local economies</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-12 20:29:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/conor_baranski/9p4gs0tneyuc/wish/215608224</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Should the Scotchman Peaks Wilderness Area be designated as Wilderness by the US Congress?	</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/conor_baranski/9p4gs0tneyuc/wish/215608491</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I feel like it should be designated as wilderness because that way that it keeps getting better and better and over time more things in the peaks will be restored and nourished again and maybe if they do pass it then more people will hear and be like oh this is serious and they might try to help out as much as they can.</div><div><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-12 20:30:15 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/conor_baranski/9p4gs0tneyuc/wish/215608491</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Yes </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/conor_baranski/9p4gs0tneyuc/wish/215608663</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>We believe that the Scotchman peaks should be designated for several reasons. Firstly, the area of land is not large enough to impact the amount of natural resources that will be taken from future generations. In fact, the area of area of land proposed for designation is only 1% of the national forest system lands. Also, the characteristic of the land is already not ideal for mining, logging, or other economical purposes. The proposed bill will barely affect recreational access. The designation also contributes to the preservation of biodiversity, and encourages people to appreciate pristine nature.</div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-12 20:30:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/conor_baranski/9p4gs0tneyuc/wish/215608663</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Yes, our group believes the Scotchman Peaks wilderness area should be federally protected. We think preservation is very important and necessary.  </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/conor_baranski/9p4gs0tneyuc/wish/215609096</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-12 20:32:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/conor_baranski/9p4gs0tneyuc/wish/215609096</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Scotchman&#39;s Peak should be a designated wilderness area, for two reasons one there would not be any drastic changes that would have effect on everyone around the area because its already a road less area and only 14,000 acres will be used in this bill. And two, to keep the wilderness there for all the wildlife that calls the peak home.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/conor_baranski/9p4gs0tneyuc/wish/215610136</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-12 20:35:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/conor_baranski/9p4gs0tneyuc/wish/215610136</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Yes</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/conor_baranski/9p4gs0tneyuc/wish/215611442</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Our group believes that Scotchman Peaks should be designated wilderness area to preserve the natural beauty for future generations. Save the area from people trying to profit off of the land.  It is important to see the nature and preserve it. It is not large enough to hurt the community and it will save an ecosystem from future possibilities.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-12 20:39:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/conor_baranski/9p4gs0tneyuc/wish/215611442</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
