All the different years that this was spread through was very interesting to me.

Maybe read off the board a little less

I- OxyContin crisis disproved their values

E- try slowing down a little bit so your flow is better

I: That Purdue Pharma approved opiods were safe to use.

E: Slowing down a bit

Interesting- The amount of companies that mislead the general public.

Even Better- More contact with the audience.

I- it was interesting how bad they were

e- read off the board a little less

I: opioids were the cause of more than 500,000 deaths

E: don't use full sentences in slides

Interesting - Purdue Pharma claimed opioids were safe and good to use (proved wrong)

Even better - try to slow down and enunciate a little better

I : the Sackler family itself needs to pay 6 million in fines

E : more eye contact with audience

I-lied about addictiveness of opioids

E-lots of words on slide

I: There were 500,000 opioid-related deaths in 2020

E: Speak toward audience more often

I: That the company will be 100% liquidated

E: Monotone

I- 500,000 deaths from opioids in 2020, after this scandal had closed. Would be interesting to explore.

E- Inconsistent flow

I: How people believed that opioids were actually safe

E: Some slides had to many words on screen

I: They got their opiods to be aproved

E: Read off the board less

I- The amount of deaths that happened.

E- Talk a little louder.

I- it was proven wrong that opioids were safe

E- make sure everyone is speaking the same amount

I - Siphoning money to Alameda

E - Readling less of the board

I- there were a lot of issues with it.

E- maybe use some notecards

I- Crypto is an interesting topic.

E- More contact with the audience.

I: That since people wanted to pull out $6 million it caused a market crash

E: Maybe use some notecards

I- FTX was siphoning money that was being misused by Bankman-Fried

E- stay grounded when talking

I can't believe they syphened so much money

slowing down

I : mentioning who had shares, including Tom Brady and Shaq O'neill, also the fact that Tom Brady was an ambassador

E : Too much stuff (pictures) on the slides

I: Money was being missued

E: Use notecards

I- The amount of money that people wanted to pull out.

E- Try to stay grounded when you're talking.

I- Very reminiscent of Enron

E- Try to fidget a little less.

I: FTX kept all of their money and went bankrupt because of it

E: Control hand movements and fidgeting

I: Tom Brady was an ambassador

E: Less sudden movements

I-Tom Brady Was ambassador

E-More enthusiastic

I: celebrities like Tom Brady were invested in it

E: face the audience a bit more

I- the companies and individuals lost all of their money because of this scandal

E- some were reading off of the slides a little too much

Interesting - FTX used the shares for fraud and personal benefit

Even Better - use more tone when speaking, rather than being monotone

I- I find it interesting how long it took for him to get caught

E- More visual engagement with the audience

I- it was interesting how much they payed to resolve it

e- maybe look less at the slides.

I: Related to Purdue Pharma Case

E: Use even more tone

crazy that they are influencing the selling of this drug

maybe read off the board a little less

I: Purdue Pharma only wanted money and didn't care about the risks it gave people.

E: Read off of slides less

interesting - chased a profit rather than focusing of the opioid addicted population

even better - read off board less and use more tone

I: Their business influence Purdue Pharma into selling opioids, both companies got caught

E: Read less off the slides

I- I found it interesting how this one ties in with the Purdue group

E- More tone fluctuation

I- They made certain people have more than they should, instead of spreading it out

E- Be more engaging while you speak

I - Payed over 1 billion to reset the company

E - Limit reading off slides

I- Connection with Purdue Pharma

E- Expand from slides more in the opening. Give more detail if you can.

I: worked with Purdue pharma

E: moved around quite a bit

I: They were involved with Purdue Pharma

E: Too many words on certain slides

I- The amount of money they paid to resolve the issue.

E- Talk a little louder.

I: How many hundreds of millions of dollars they had to pay in settlements

E: less words on some of the slides would be easier on the eyes

I- impacted many more people than one would think

E- too many words on certain slides

I: Worked with purdue pharma

E: Read off the slides less

I - Interesting how it tied into the first group

E - could summarize slides, use notecards vs reading off slides

I : Mckinsey already had a bad reputation

E : too much words on the slides, makes it hard to follow along

crazy that he killed his son

add a little more pictures

I: That he stole $12+ million from clients

E: Don't read right off of slides as much

How can someone get away with so much fraud?

Try not to have note cards

I : fraud only found after he committed murder and authorities looked into him

E : Talk a bit louder and affimatively

interesting - he worked at the law firm and was trusted so nobody knew or suspected him

even better - read less of the board

I- The amount of legal issues.

E- Very nitty gritty --> Spacing of notes on the presentation. Because I like what they did.

I - Had wealth but also took advantage of clients

E - Don’t read word for word off the slides

I- Just the extent of his crimes and the success he had prior to his family's murder.

E- Try to engage the audience more.

I - He abused the trust people had in him

E - There was a lot of reading off slides

I: killed his own family members, and took money from his own family

E: don't rely on the cards/slides as much

I- 40 year sentence

E-More enthusiasm

I: That the fraud wasnt found for so long

E: Read less off the board

I: All the crimes he committed, even though he had everything in his life going well as it seemed.

E:

I: Alex Murdaugh stayed hidden for a long time through all of his theft

E: Consistency of effort between members

I- He stole $12 million from clients and his own law firm.

E- Talk a little louder.

I: How respected he was because people didn't know his dark side

E: to many words on some slides and sometimes too much reading

I- Alex Murdaugh got away with a lot of crimes because of the money he had

E- maybe practice just a bit more, so you have to read off of your notes less

took years to realize the fraud

read a little less of the board

interesting- Minnesota based

even better - read less of board

I- this was in minnesota

e- use notecards so you aren't looking so much at the screen

I - They are based in Minnesota

E - Could use a bit more practice

I-Wasting money

E-more visuals

I: How they took a good cause and made it fraudulent.

E:

I: That is was in Minnesota

E: Read less straight off board

I- It happened in MN.

E- Talk a little slower.

I: 3% of the money they received actually went to kids

E: don't move around as much

I: The FBI raided their warehouses

E: Look at the board a little less

I- The way the submitted faulse infromation. The trial is still on going.

E- Clear branchng of topics.

I: The FBI had to raid their warehouses

E: some more visuals would help

I - case not over yet, many people still under investigation

E - could use a few visuals

stealing money from low income families is crazy

Read less of the slides

I - Used another LLC to run funds through

E - Coud use more practice

I: $7 million was stolen from low-income families, very similar to Feeding Our Future scandal

E: Be more with the audience

I: That stolen funds were used to purchase luxury items.

E: Look to audience more

I: stole 7 million dollars from low-income families

E: don't read off the screen as much, especially with notecards

I- Children and families were striped from meals

E- practice more so you can sell what you are saying better

I: Children and families were stripped from meals

E: Read less off the slides

interesting - stolen funds were used for personal benefit

even better - use a more professional tone

I- Yet again fraud in the food world. Crazy that this keeps going on.

E- Less "closed off" boby langauge.

I- $7 million was stolen.

E- Read off the slides a little less.

I-ego courrupted judgement

E-reading off slides

I - Stole $7 million from low income families and used for personal benefit

E - read less directly off the note card, be more familiar with information

I- The prevalence of non - profit fraud.

E- Don't rely so much on the slides/ note cards.

I- there was a lot of stuff that went wrong

E- talk a little slower

I: They were providing fake proof that they delivered the meals

E: less ugh or um's. Too much reading

I: How children can't be recompensated

E: Projection

liked learning facts about Boeing

read a little less off the slide

I- it was interesting how many problems they have with their planes.

e- not look at the screen so much

I - 737 MAX crashes killed 346 people

E - Talk more to audience

interesting - max crashes that killed 346 people

better - audience eye contact

I- The culture of pressure slide.

E- Don't use "I" in a group presentation.

I- The issues with planes still ongoing.

E- Standing in attention but not taking away from the presentation.

I-lots of crashes

E-less reading off slides

I: 737 Max crashes, prioritizing market competition over safety

E: Not sure

I: killed 346 people through 2018-2019

E: Eye contact with audience.

I: How large scale all of these concerns are

E: Some slides had to many words

I: they put safety on the back-burner since they worry about profit more

E: don't move around as much

I- $2.8 billion settlement

E- It was very good but try to read off the slides a little bit less

I - encouraged to produce product faster rather than safer

E - Maybe less on each slide

I: Displaying the problem of the plane's faulty

E: Too long

I : values found on Boeing's website

E : bit bigger conclusion, so we remember the facts

I: 737 MAX crashes killed 346 people between 2018 and 2019

E: One of the best presentations today, just memorize a few more points

I- it was interesting all the stuff they did

e- maybe not read off of the slides as much

the manulaptive they used

read less off slides

I- big settlement with the FTC

E- Less words per slide

I - Dark Patterns

E - There was a lot of reading straight off the slides

interesting - amazon tricked costumers into renewing their subscriptions

even better - read off slides less

I-1 billion in penalties

E-lots of words on slide

I: That amazon never owned up to doing anything wrong

E: Don't speak right off of the slides

I: renewed clients memberships without them knowing

E: don't read off the slides as much, less words on slides

I: How many people around us were probably affected

E: way too many words on screen

I- the enrollment practice. It is not their first time in a scandal.

E- Have only one person behind the desk.

I- The lack of individual accountability.

E- Engage with the audience more, especially when the slides contain so much text. Hard for people to stay focused.

I: the settlement with FTC

E: a lot of information on slides, leading to read off the slides

I - Enrolled consumers into subscriptions without consent

E - read less directly off the slides, had way too much on each slide

I : company that I actually use

E : way too many words on slides

I- It is interesting how one of the worlds biggest companies gets away with things like this.

E- The slides are very wordy, and you are reading all the words off of them

I: Automatically renewed Amazon Prime and difficult to cancel, $51 (3x17) restitution

E: Practice off-script and fluency, way less on all slides please, slurring words, give audience attention and respect-actually think of the group you're talking to when creating a presentation.

I- it was interesting how many people got their information accessed

e- more enthusiasm

I- DATA BREACH!!!!. Personal and genetic data being leaked is crazy.

E- Have only one person behind the desk.

I: That people hacked into others accounts to see all of their information

E: Practice more

I-Gets hacked

E-know how to say peoples name you are using

I - DNA information was sold

E - A little more practice, but delivery was good!

I: The 2023 data breach, online attackers gained access to over 7 million customer profiles (profiles being sold on black web)

E: try not to read off slides/notecards too much)

interesting - data breach that took information from 23 and me

do better - know how to say the stake holder name other than that good job

I- Good response from Ancestry and Heritage.

E- Uneven contribution, at least in terms of presenting.

I: 7 million peoples information got exposed

E: maybe look up how to pronounce names before presenting

I: website was hacked, giving them access to 7 million people

E: don't rely on the note cards as much

I: How a trusted company like amazon is doing all of these bad things and its still not mainstream

E: Too many words on screen, Too long

I : how that many information breached

E : speak louder, towards public

I - reputational damage due to a security breach. Hackers sold information

E - Could be a little louder and rely less on notecards

I: 23 and me didn't protect the private information of their customers

E: Inconsistent eye contact

I: 7 million profiles accessed in data breach

E: Consistency between members, be more wary of time taken, don't treat it like a paper

I- it was interesting how they got caught

e- speak a little louder so everyone can hear.

The affair is crazy to me

add a few more pictures

I-Didnt know they were both in seperate marriages

E-more visuals

I - They both held respectable positions at Astronomer

E - Speak a little louder

I: The ripple down effect of the scandal

E:

cant believe they got caught

try to only reference note cards

I: they were both in marriages

E: don't rely on the notecards as much

I- head of HR having an affair with the CEO of the company... kind of hypocritical

E- Try to present your information more to the audience, rather than just reading off of notecards.

I: Both individuals were married, and the incident affect both families and communities

E: Memorize slightly more information

1. Standing up straight and sholders are pointed out towards the audience.

2. Transitions were clear and helped with the flow of the presentation.

I- nteresting

1. How big of a scandal this was to all of those involved.

E- ven Better

1. Eye contact with the audience.

2. Have more flow vocally. "Be more loose with your movement".