McDonald's popularity among young people compared to KFC can be attributed to several key factors:

1. Menu Diversity & Innovation: McDonald's offers a broader, more customizable menu, including burgers, fries, breakfast items, and limited-time collaborations (e.g., Travis Scott, BTS meals). This variety appeals to adventurous tastes and dietary preferences. KFC’s focus on fried chicken, while iconic, may feel less versatile.

2. Affordability & Value Perception: McDonald’s emphasizes value meals, dollar menus, and budget-friendly options, crucial for cost-conscious youth. KFC’s combo meals are often perceived as pricier, despite similar pricing tiers.

3. Tech-Savvy Engagement: McDonald’s invests heavily in app-based ordering, rewards programs, and digital integration, aligning with young consumers’ preference for convenience and gamified experiences. KFC’s tech offerings are less prominent.

4. Trend-Driven Marketing: McDonald’s leverages pop culture, social media trends (TikTok, Instagram), and viral campaigns (e.g., McFlurry remixes), creating a "cool" factor. KFC’s branding, while humorous, leans on traditional mascots like Colonel Sanders, which may feel less relatable.

5. Ambiance & Social Spaces: McDonald’s modernizes its stores with free Wi-Fi, charging ports, and McCafé sections, positioning itself as a hangout spot. KFC’s ambiance is often more utilitarian, focused on quick dining.

6. Global Adaptability: McDonald’s tailors menus to local tastes (e.g., teriyaki burgers in Japan, McAloo Tikki in India), enhancing accessibility. KFC adapts too but remains more niche in its chicken-centric identity.

7. Health Perception: While both are fast food, McDonald’s offers salads and fruit options, creating a marginally healthier image. KFC’s fried items may deter health-conscious youth.

8. Cultural Relevance: McDonald’s capitalizes on nostalgia (Happy Meals) and social media challenges, fostering peer-driven visits. KFC lacks comparable viral momentum.

In summary, McDonald’s success stems from its ability to blend affordability, innovation, and youth-centric branding, creating a dynamic ecosystem that resonates with younger demographics globally. KFC, while popular, leans on a narrower menu and less agile marketing, making it a less frequent choice for trend-focused youth.

Worth:Our nation is motivating people to have three babies,but the present young people have low desires of marriage.What happened in the society,people don’t want to get married not to mention have kids.

Different opinions:Is it a rational or irrational actions?Somebody thinks it's because the conflict between male and female,and others consider the reason is the effect of web-it gives us too many extreme viewpoints,and the young can not distinguish which is the right.

My opinion:We shouldn’t decide our marriage too early.

Statistics:

Marriage Registration Data

In 2024, the number of marriage registrations nationwide was 6.106 million pairs, a sharp 20.5% decline from 2023, hitting the lowest level since 1980.

In the first quarter of 2025, there were only 1.81 million marriage registrations nationwide, a drop of 159,000 pairs (8.1% decline) from 1.969 million pairs in the same period last year, reaching a nearly decade-low.

Invitation：Please share your opinions of this topic?We want to know why do this phenomenon  appear?And do you have some reasonable solutions?I’m in earnest anticipation of your participation.

Part Two: My perspective on the Issue The Hunger Games is not merely a futuristic fantasy but a reflection of many societies’ excesses and the media’s role in Flattening oppression. Evidence and Reasoning The Capitol hoards resources, leaving districts in poverty—a scale akin to the 1% controlling 45% of global wealth (Oxfam, 2023). Katniss’s hunger in District 12 symbolizes the hardship faced by 811 million people globally experiencing chronic undernourishment (UN, 2024). The Games themselves are a metaphor for how marginalized communities are pitted against each other for survival while the elites profit.

The Capitol broadcasts the Games as entertainment, numbing citizens to violence. Similarly, modern media often prioritizes sensationalism over substance—e.g., televised political scandals diverting attention from climate policies. The novel’s “bread and circuses” tactic mirrors how authoritarian regimes use nationalism or entertainment to suppress dissent.

Katniss’s defiance, such as her berry-suicide threat with Peeta, sparks rebellion. This mirrors real-world movies like "Braveheart ", where symbolic acts (e.g., taking a knee) galvanize collective action against systemic injustice. The Mockingjay emblem becomes a universal symbol of resistance, much like the raised fist in protest movements.Critics may argue that the novel’s extreme violence dilutes its message. However, the grotesque spectacle is intentional; it forces readers to confront uncomfortable truths about desensitization to suffering in media-saturated societies.

Conclusion ： By framing oppression as entertainment, "The Hunger Games" challenges readers to confront their complicity in systems of inequality. Its global relevance lies in its warning: unchecked power and apathy enable dehumanization. As Katniss asks, "What happens when the good destitute stop watching the Capitol’s games?"—the answer is in the people facing injustice nowadays in the world.

Traveling is a significant part of college life, offering opportunities for exploration, self-discovery, and bonding. However, a debate persists among students: Is it better to travel alone or with companions? This question arises from differing priorities—some prioritize freedom and introspection, while others value shared experiences and safety. For instance, solo travel allows flexibility in planning, whereas group trips foster collaboration and reduce costs. The discussion is worth exploring because it reflects broader themes of independence versus social connection, financial constraints, and personal growth. Existing viewpoints vary: advocates of solo travel emphasize autonomy, while supporters of group trips highlight companionship and practical benefits like cost-sharing.

2. My view

While I fully acknowledge the merits of group travel—such as fostering camaraderie with friends or creating cherished memories with family—my stance remains that solo travel should not only coexist with these options but also emerge as a primary mode of exploration for college students. This is not a dismissal of collective experiences but a recognition of the irreplaceable growth opportunities that solo trips uniquely provide. 

First, solo travel serves as a catalyst for self-sufficiency, a skill often underdeveloped in structured group settings. For instance, managing a budget alone or navigating a foreign public transport system cultivates financial literacy and adaptability—competencies directly transferable to academic projects and future careers. Second, solo journeys allow students to prioritize their own interests without compromise. A 2023 survey by Travel Youth Insights revealed that 81% of solo travelers felt their trips were "more fulfilling" because they could focus entirely on personal passions, whether it’s sketching architecture or hiking remote trails. Third, solo travel prepares students for life beyond college. As young adults transition into independence, the ability to thrive in solitude becomes invaluable—a point emphasized by psychologist Dr. Emily Hart in her TED Talk on "Embracing Alone Time as a Superpower." 

Critics might argue that group travel inherently supports emotional well-being through shared joy. However, solo travel does not equate to isolation; it encourages intentional connections. Platforms like Couchsurfing or local-hosted workshops enable travelers to meet diverse individuals on their own terms, blending autonomy with social engagement. Moreover, the argument that "group trips are safer" is increasingly countered by technology. Apps like TripWhistle offer emergency services in 200+ countries, empowering solo adventurers to explore confidently. 

In essence, advocating for solo travel as a cornerstone of college life does not negate the value of group trips. Rather, it highlights a necessary balance: students should embrace collective adventures with loved ones while reserving space for solo expeditions. These independent journeys lay the groundwork for resilience, self-awareness, and a lifelong love for exploration—qualities that define both academic success and personal fulfillment. 

Do you agree that solo travel should be prioritized as a "core" experience for students, even if group trips remain enjoyable? How can universities encourage solo travel without undermining the social benefits of group activities? Could a "solo travel requirement" in study-abroad programs enhance student development? Share your ideas on balancing these two modes of exploration!

At the beginning of the story, the homeless cat actively walked into the tent of an alone-cycling blogger, Zhao Shuo. Thinking of the saying about “seventy-two transformations, seventy-two lives”, Zhao Shuo warmly named the unexpected guest “Wukong” and started their cycling journey. Everything seemed to be happy and lovely. However, the giant misfortune happened without any foreshadowing.

On 15th, April, Wukong was found dead abruptly. Through several days of research, Zhao Shuo discovered that Wukong was poisoned by someone deliberately, which was confirmed by three hospitals. Sadly, up till now, the murderer is still missing.

This kind of misfortune not only happened to Wukong but also happened to many cats and dogs in our society. There is always someone who hurts the homeless cats and destroys their shelters on purpose, and even some perverts abuse them for money.

From my point of view, I extremely hate this inhumane abuse. How could the miserable murderer kill such a lovely cat without any guilt or hesitation? I mean, the friendly creature did nothing harmful to society but ended with such a sympathetic ending. This is not normal and correct. Every animal at least has the right to survive, not to mention those friendly and harmless animals. Instead of hurting them deliberately and maliciously, we can protect them as possible as we can. But if you don’t like them, just go away and don’t do something wrong, which will cause you to be in a moral dilemma.

Therefore, how do you think about the deliberate abuse or cruelty? Are you feeling sad, upset, pitiful, or indifferent? Do you hate that or not? Any thoughts are welcome.

Meritocracy originally refers to a philosophical theory that emphasizes personal ability and achievements as the primary criteria for success, advocating the belief "the person who have the stronger ability should receive more". In university, meritocracy highlights that college life should focus on improving GPA, enhancing rankings, and gaining more opportunities such as postgraduate recommendation privileges.

In the past, meritocracy has the same purpose as the exam-oriented education system and it emphasize on a striving for academic performance, so it did contribute to improving students' grades and benefits. However, as society growing, the education theory that only sticks to academic performance may have become outdated. Today’s university evaluation systems use multiple criteria, making it difficult to succeed by sticking to a single path. The increasing number of university students has let number of competitors and pressure surge, resulting it more and more difficult to defeat all peers. Statistics show that the admission rate for China’s postgraduate entrance exams of some schools dropped to just 10%, reflecting the intense involution environment.

Beyond being ineffective, meritocracy can also do harm to students' mental health development. Under this ideology, university students may be more and more afraid of falling behind. To earn the limited resources, students may gradually develop the fear of missing out. The relentless pressure of ranking systems and competition is bound to foster anxiety and depression.

Life should be an open wilderness. Don’t limit yourself in the secular success. Broaden your horizons and avoid being trapped on a single path. The true purpose of education is to embrace the journey of education.

Last Thursday, the dorm management issued special regulations. The main measures are to ban students from feeding and teasing cats in the dormitory, clean up cat nests, promptly drive away the cats, and disinfect the environment.

Regarding this regulation, there are three views: support, neutrality (believing expulsion is unnecessary), and opposition (with fewer supporters). It's worth exploring because cats are everywhere in the school, closely related to students, and the school has a cat association. Also, dormitory buildings aren't completely closed. So, is it too harsh to drive the cats away? Can people and cats coexist harmoniously in the dormitory area?

My core idea: Cats should not be fed in the dormitory building area. Professional staff can remove or guide them away, but not drive them off .

Before the measure was issued, some girls in the dormitory communication group complained about being bothered by cats showing up unexpectedly. After the measure was implemented, there were hardly any cats in the dormitory building area. A previous questionnaire I conducted showed that nearly 45% of respondents supported all the above - mentioned measures, while 36% opposed herding the cats. What's more, 40% of respondents actually felt surprised and happy when cats appeared.

My reasons are as follows:

① Cats in dormitory buildings do cause trouble to some students.

② Not feeding cats in this area can reduce their dependence on it.

③ During bad weather, with few and poorly - protected outdoor cat nests, cats that hide in the corridor should not be driven away.

④ Cats are part of the school. Since most students like them, driving them away is too harsh and inconsistent with the concept of humanistic care.

⑤ Given the open nature of the dormitory building area, even if cats are driven away, they are likely to return. Such measures are not only ineffective in solving the problem but also wasteful of resources, offering only a temporary fix.

⑥ Students can keep corridor doors and windows closed and store personal items indoors rather than in the hallway to avoid damage.

What are your ideas and suggestions? Looking forward to your answer!

Involution, a term describing relentless yet unproductive competition, has permeated modern education and workplaces.

Students sacrifice sleep for marginal GPA improvements, while employees endure

"996" schedules (9 AM to 9 PM, six days a week) to stay afloat. This phenomenon is fueled by societal pressure to outperform peers, often at the cost of mental health and innovation.

Why It Matters

Involution perpetuates burnout and stifles creativity. For instance, a 2023 survey revealed that 68% of Chinese students experience severe anxiety due to academic competition, while Japan's "karoshi"（death from overwork) cases highlight extreme workplace consequences.

Controversies

Pro-Involution: Some argue it drives societal progress by pushing individuals to their limits.

Anti-Involution: Critics demand systemic reforms, such as reducing standardized testing or redefining success metrics.

Stance

Anti-Involution Requires Redefining Success

Core Claim

Society must shift from quantity-driven metrics to quality-focused evaluations to combat involution.

Evidence

Case Study: Norway's education system emphasizes collaborative learning over rankings, resulting in higher student wellbeing and global innovation rankings.

Data: Companies like Basecamp adopting

32-hour workweeks saw a 20% increase in productivity and employee satisfaction.

Ethical Imperative: Overwork contradicts the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly "Decent Work and Economic Growth."

Rebuttal

Opponents claim reducing competition lowers ambition. However, anti-involution targets meaningless competition (e.g., memorizing textbooks for exams) while preserving healthy rivalry (e.g., skill-based contests).

From a cultural perspective, eternal love is often celebrated as unwavering loyalty and a bond that transcends life and death, embodying a commitment that spans time and space. Classic tales like 《Romeo and Juliet》exemplify this: though their love ends tragically, their steadfast devotion becomes a symbol of eternal love. In contrast, momentary love emphasizes the spark of passion and the thrill of an instant, such as the brief yet profound connection between the protagonists in the film 《Before Sunrise》. Their chance encounter on a train and the fleeting hours they share—every glance exchanged and every heartfelt conversation—epitomize the beauty of love in its most ephemeral form.

Exploring this question helps us better understand the essence of love. Different perspectives on love shape how individuals approach relationships and influence societal perceptions and cultural narratives. Some argue that eternal love is the only “true” love, worthy of admiration because it withstands the test of time. Others believe momentary love is more authentic, capturing the raw, unfiltered intensity of human emotion.

I believe the beauty of love lies in both eternity and the moment, with the two complementing each other.

My core argument is that fleeting moments of love are the initial spark, igniting passion and longing in the human heart. In the instant love arises—the flutter of a heartbeat, the rush of adrenaline—we experience love in its purest form. For example, imagine two strangers locking eyes at a grand ballroom dance. In that suspended moment, the world fades away, and their gaze holds infinite possibilities. This instantaneous connection embodies the magic of love, inspiring our yearning for deeper connection.

However, if love remains confined to fleeting moments, it becomes like a昙花一现 (ephemeral bloom), unable to endure. Eternal love is built upon countless such moments, tempered and refined over time. It encompasses mutual support, understanding, and compromise in daily life. Consider a couple celebrating their golden wedding anniversary: through decades of shared joys and sorrows, they have transformed ordinary moments—quiet companionship, small acts of kindness—into a tapestry of enduring love. Facing illness, hardship, or mundane routines together, their bond exemplifies resilience and depth.

To the rebuttal that “fleeting love is too illusory, while eternal love is reliable,” I argue that the illusion of momentary love is precisely its allure—it fuels creativity and romantic ideals. Conversely, eternal love is not devoid of idealism; it represents a shared vision nurtured and sustained over time.

Do you agree that love’s beauty lies in both its eternal and momentary dimensions? Why or why not? In the love stories you’ve experienced or encountered, do examples lean more toward eternal commitment or transient passion? Beyond time (eternity vs. the moment), what other factors shape our perception of love’s beauty—such as societal norms, personal experiences, or cultural values? Finally, how might we balance the exhilaration of fleeting love with the quiet steadiness of lasting love in real life?

This picture is taken from the comment section of the Internet. Please contact us if there is any infringement.

Actually, this is a question that people often ask: whether to read ten thousands books or travel ten thousand miles. This question originates from the ancient Chinese exploration of the relationship between knnowledge and action. "Reading ten thousands books" represents the accumulation of theoretical knowledge, emphasizing the acquisition of indirect experience through books. "Traveling ten thousand miles," symbolizes practice and experience, highlighting the gaining of direct cognition through personal experiences. Nowadays, some people say that reading ten thousand books is not as good as traveling ten thousand miles. However, there are also those who travel extensively to understand the world and form their own ideas. I believe the reason it worth discussing is that it is a very interesting topic. One's perspective on the issue can reflect their way of thinking. In my opinion, these two approaches represent different dimensions through which we can understand the world.

For my stance:

I think that reading a multitude of books is a more suitable way for the majority of people to understand the world.

Firstly, reading a multitude of books can provide deeper and broader knowledge. Whether it is about domestic or international affairs, ancient or modern times, all aspects of politics, history, society, science and technology, and so on, can be learned through books. You can expand your knowledge reserve by reading popular science books and stimulate your imagination by reading science fiction and fairy tales. This process of absorbing knowledge is conducive to our growth and development.

Secondly, reading ten thousand books is not just about reading books; it also refers to the learning process. For example, when teachers impart knowledge to students, students are not only acquiring knowledge but also learning how to think—a kind of thinking that can solve problems. This new way of thinking is gradually internalized through the learning process. Learning to use one’s own thinking to solve problems and developing critical thinking skills are essential. These abilities can help people cope with uncertainties in life, something that traveling ten thousand miles cannot achieve.

What's more, at present, traveling extensively is limited by one’s financial situation. The global economic development has been somewhat impeded by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Data shows that the tourism industry has declined in the post-pandemic era, indicating that people’s average expenditure on travel has decreased. If we consider traveling extensively as a way to understand the world, I believe only a small minority of people can actually achieve it.

I believe that, on a superficial level, reading ten thousand books represents theory, while traveling ten thousand miles represents practice. Only with a certain foundation of theoretical knowledge can practice become meaningful. Otherwise, it would be like the so - called sightseeing in travel, which is merely a cursory glance. Therefore, it is more important to first acquire solid theoretical knowledge.

These two phenomena often happen to college students and fresh workers who are young, which indicates their confuse, effortless and self-mockery towards their life and future. In most of the time, they are pushed forward because of their colleague or peers do so, but they failed to have achievement in most of the cases, living in a competitive vibe and struggling in mind, lifting up and giving up round and round.

It seems a pity, right? However, I don’t think so. Firstly, we called ourselves NPC because we always follow the same route and do the similar things. But actually, we’re just doing the routine. Everyone has their own hobby, personality and dream, which lead them to the different road. So it’s fault to title ourselves as “NPC” simply.

And about the 45-degree, it can’t be denied that most people are not born to be an elite, so it’s so common that we can’t achieve to the top even we do our best. Besides, the effort you make to push the angle from 0 to 45 can make contribution to the development of society and country. Everyone sparked a little shine can lit up the sky, everyone strive for life positively can push the society forward.

By the way, there’s a golden mean of the Confucian school called “ZhongYong”, which means moderation. It refers that doing everything shouldn’t be too much or less. Obeying the Chinese traditional wisdom, we should not complain that we live in a “45 degrees” life. Instead, we should be appreciated and satisfied about it.

All of my opinions are on the above. And how do you think about the question? Come to consider and leave your comment!

Under China’s Measures for the Administration of Human Assisted Reproductive Technology (2001), surrogacy is strictly prohibited. Legalizing surrogacy could institutionalize the commodification of women’s bodies. In 2023 alone, over 500 illegal surrogacy cases were investigated nationwide (National Health Commission, 2023), with Changsha’s villa scandal exposing a sophisticated network involving brokers, clinics, and vulnerable women. The surrogacy is the action that tramples on the majesty of the law. On the societal level, using rural disabled women as surrogates will reinforce the gender and social class inequality. On the individual level, the legalization of surrogacy equals losing control of own body. WHO (2021) estimates that the risk of hypertensive disorder is 2-3 times higher in IVF procedures which is experienced by surrogates than in IVF pregnancies.

Proponents claimed surrogacy is a “free transaction” between consenting adults. However, poverty strips women of true autonomy. In the Changsha case, surrogates received ¥200,000, while brokers profited over ¥1 million per transaction—a 500% markup. This reflects a broader pattern: 70% of surrogates in developing countries enter the trade due to financial desperation (International Labor Organization, 2022). When survival is at stake, “choice” becomes coercion. Besides that, if we advocate the legalization of surrogacy only because it is free for them to do so, there will always exist someone who is richer than you can buy you body and make you commit that you are willing to do that. There are also some voices like surrogacy will be of benefit to the social birth rate and at the same time support families’ fertility. According to China’s Ministry of Civil Affairs (2023), there are currently 191,000 registered orphans. Choosing adaptation as an alternative instead of commercializing the women’s body is much more acceptable in such a legal society.

From my point of view, surrogacy is legally and ethically wrong and should never be legalized. While declining birth rates are a concern, surrogacy is not the answer. Sweden and France maintain total bans yet achieve stable fertility through subsidized childcare and parental leave. Commercializing reproduction risks reducing children to luxury goods accessible only to the wealthy. Even “altruistic” surrogacy carries risks. A 2022 study in the British Journal of Psychiatry found 30% of surrogates experience postpartum depression due to forced separation from the child. Legalization cannot eliminate emotional trauma or power imbalances. Our country should impose harsher punishments for brokers, as outlined in China’s 2020 Criminal Law Amendment.

How do you think? Can any form of surrogacy coexist with gender equality? How might legalizing surrogacy impact China’s progress in reducing orphan populations? Should bodily autonomy ever outweigh societal ethics? Feel free to post your comments.

Homosexuality refers to romantic or sexual attraction between individuals of the same gender. Historically, many societies have criminalized homosexual relationships due to religious, cultural, or legal norms. Despite significant progress in rights such as the legalization of same-sex marriage in many countries, discrimination against homosexuals persists in various forms, including workplace bias, social exclusion, and even violence.  

Worth

Discrimination against homosexuals violates fundamental human rights, such as equality and dignity. Addressing this issue is critical for fostering inclusive societies, improving mental health outcomes for LGBTQ+ individuals, and upholding ethical principles.

Controversies

Religious: Some argue that homosexuality conflicts with religious teachings or traditional family structures.

Legal Protections: Disputes arise over whether laws should explicitly protect LGBTQ+ individuals from discrimination.

My opinion

Homosexuals should not be discriminated against under any circumstances.

Supporting Evidence

1. Organizations like the American Psychological Association (APA) state that homosexuality is a normal variation of human sexuality, not a disorder.  

2.  The UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights prohibits discrimination based on "any status" (Article 2), which includes sexual orientation. Countries with LGBTQ+ protections (e.g., Canada, Netherlands) show better mental health outcomes among homosexual populations.  

3. Platonic love in ancient Greece

4. The poem 'Zijin' from the Classic of Poetry is a lyrical expression of male homosexual love.

How do you view whether homosexuality should be discriminated against?We would like to know everyone's opinions.

The Israel-Palestine conflict, which has continued for 19 months, is one of the world’s most pressing humanitarian disasters. In recent weeks, ceasefire negotiations in Doha have restarted, while Israeli attacks have grown more intense. This contrast shows how fragile the hope for peace is and and how destructive the war truly is. As a university student who watches this tragedy through news and social media, I chose this topic because it’s a crucial moment to test global unity and compassion. Images of ruined homes in Gaza, videos of families huddled in tents, and charts showing over 53,000 deaths since 2023 have deeply affected everyone. That urges us to take immediate actions to stop the suffering.

This conflict isn't just a regional problem, but a worldwide one that threatens global security and makes political tensions. As it shakes up the stability of the whole world, European countries have recently joined together to criticize the violence. At the same time, Arab leaders promised to help Palestine with rebuilding after the war. Meanwhile, China has repeatedly called for a two-state solution that lets Israel and Palestine live peacefully. This idea matches the values of justice and solving problems through talks and offers a practical way to build long-term peace.

The conflict matters globally because it breaks international laws and ignores human rights. Attacks on hospitals and harming civilians go against basic moral rules. But it also presents an opportunity for countries to work together. China’s call for a permanent ceasefire and fair negotiations shows a way forward. By seeing this crisis as a problem, we can and we must encourage action, not just as students, but as global citizens who believe in a future where talking and understanding win over violence.

My Perspective on the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: A Call for Justice and China’s Peaceful Advocacy

As a university student watching the conflict through news and social media, I firmly believe that peace is not an abstract ideal but an urgent need for humans. My perspective of the conflict focuses on three arguments: the pressing need of a two-state solution, the moral duty of protecting civilians, and China’s role as a main mediator in promoting peace. These positions match with both universal humanitarian values and China’s consistent foreign policy of non-interference and peaceful coexistence.

1. The Two-State Solution

The core of the conflict lies in the unresolved Palestinian problem for statehood. As Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi emphasized, the two-state solution—based on 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as Palestine’s capital—remains the only workable path to achieving peace. This vision acknowledges historical injustices: the displacement of Palestinians in 1948 and the occupation of Gaza and the West Bank. Israel’s military campaigns, such as the 2023-2024 bombardment of Gaza, have worsened the crises, making over 2 million people homeless and destroying critical infrastructure like hospitals and schools.

China’s advocacy for Palestinian statehood stems from its historical struggles against colonialism. As a nation that endured foreign aggression a century ago, China empathizes with Palestine’s sufferings. Wang Yi’s call for “Palestinians governing Palestinians” reflects this solidarity, urging the international community to prioritize Palestinian self-determination over geopolitical conflicts. For students like myself, this stance resonates with our belief in equity and peace.

2. Protecting Civilians

The random attacks on civilians, like Israel’s strikes on refugee camps and aid supplementary, clearly break international humanitarian law. Also, reports showing that children make up 40% of Gaza’s casualties and the famine caused by the blockade clearly show the moral failure. China has repeatedly criticized these actions, urging Israel to stop military operations right away. These calls match the principles of justice in war, which require fairness and protection for civilians in conflicts.

As students, we are responsible for amplifying these ethical issues. Social media platforms like Instagram and TikTok have shown us firsthand stories: a Gaza doctor begging for medical supplies, a mother mourning her child under ruins. These narratives make statistics feel humane and remind us that peace isn’t just about slogan, but about preserving lives. China’s focus on "human hearts cannot be ignored, justice cannot be abandoned" highlights this moral clearness, pushing global powers to put humanity before dominance.

3. China’s Mediation

Unlike Western nations often criticized for bias, China has viewed itself as a neutral mediator. Since 2023, Chinese diplomats have worked to promote peace and dialogue, holding talks with Israeli, Palestinian, and Arab leaders to reduce tensions. For instance, Special Envoy Zhai Jun(翟隽)’s 2024 shuttle diplomacy between Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Israel showed China’s support for multilateralism. This differs sharply from some country’s unhuman support for Israel, which many fuels ripples of violence.

By focusing on diplomacy, China has shown a practical approach aimed at finding lasting solutions,  rather than deepening divisions. China’s approach lies in the idea of a “community with a shared future for mankind” and offers a model for conflict resolution rooted in respect for sovereignty. For students, this embodies how responsibility of major nation should act, which is to prioritize collective efforts over zero-sum competition.

Our Role as Students: From Awareness to Advocacy

The conflict challenges us to move beyond passive observation. Universities should offer more courses and seminars on global justice and international relations, while students can leverage digital platforms to fight against fake information and injustice. China’s youth, drawing common grounds between Palestine’s struggle and China’s  colonial history, are already vocal in online campaigns for ceasefire and aid and that’s what we can do to make contributions to global peace and build up a shared community for human in the future.

So, do you think what we, as students, should do to strive for global peace?

I firmly believe that animals should be kept in zoos or kept as pets under scientific and ethical rules. This practice balances animal welfare and human responsibility. According to domestication biology, we think that animal rights mean protecting their lives and health, not giving them total freedom.

There are three benefits of zoos. The first one is that zoos can save endangered animals. According to IUCN(International Union for Conservation of Nature世界自然保护联盟) data, 30% of endangered species relies on zoos for survival. The second one is about education. According to London Zoo study, Visitors to zoos become 57% more interested in protecting wildlife. The third one is about science. Zoos help save species like the South China tiger through breeding programs.

Also, according to CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention美国疾病控制与预防中心), Pets reduce human stress by 25%. And people have strict rules to protect their life. 

I believe emojis are a powerful tool—when used wisely. They solve a key problem in digital texts: the lack of nonverbal cues. For example, a sarcastic comment can easily be misread, but adding clarifies intent（such as "good job🙄"）. Research even shows that our brains process emoji-filled messages like real human faces, fostering empathy.

Moreover, using emojis can greatly enhance engagement and connection. Messages with emjis can make people feel a lot warmer and more enthusiastic than cold simple words.（wish you good🥰）

In a nut shell, emojis are universal and inclusive communiacation, as they transcend language barriergreatly—a ❤️or 🫶🏻is understand globally, even if people don’t share a common language can communicate with each other.

However, overuse or reliance on emojis in formal settings (e.g., work emails) can seem unprofessional. Critics say emojis are ambiguous—a 🍑 could mean a fruit or… something else. But context usually resolves this. Isn’t ambiguity also a risk with words alone?

All in all, in my own perspective, the key is to balance: emojis should complement words, not replace them.

What do you think?

Do emojis help you express yourself better, or do they confuse conversations?

Should they be avoided in serious discussions, or can they ease tension?

If you could invent a new emoji, what would it be—and why？

Share your🫵🏻 thoughts💡! 🔥

1. Industry Expansion

- From collectible toys (POP MART's market cap once exceeded $15B) to food blind boxes (Heytea's "Mystery Milk Tea Bags") and travel blind boxes (Tongcheng's "Destination Mystery Boxes"), China's blind box market surpassed $4.2B in 2023.

- Business model evolution: Transition from product sales to probability gaming. Consumer Behavior Report indicates 78% of buyers admit repeated purchases target "hidden editions."

2. Controversial Mechanisms

Addiction Design: Neuroeconomic studies confirm dopamine release during unboxing parallels gambling (Oxford University experim

ents).

Opacity: 61% of blind boxes lack probability disclosures (China Consumers Association), with 43% involving fabricated odds.

Minors at Risk: A Shanghai elementary student spent $16,800 on Ultraman card blind boxes in 3 days.

Controversy

1.- Pro:

Brands like Jellycat market blind boxes as "stress-relief rituals," with plush toy sales surging 994% by framing unboxing as self-care.

- Con:

Neuroscientists at Oxford liken the dopamine spike during unboxing to slot machines, citing cases like a Hangzhou office worker spending $2,800/month on "mystery skincare" boxes.

2. -Pro:

Heyone’s ink-painting-style blind boxes became a ASEAN cultural phenomenon, bridging traditional art and Gen Z aesthetics.

- Con:

LEGO executives criticize 72% of blind box IPs as "disposable cute" – e.g., POP MART’s Dimoo series saw 41% repurchase rate drop (2022-2024) due to repetitive designs.

3. -Pro:

KFC’s DIMOO collab drove 230% sales lift, proving consumers willingly pay "surprise premiums."

- Con:

Regulators fined Yum China $90k for hiding 1:144 hidden item odds, creating

My opinion

Blind box consumption can serve as a legitimate source of emotional fulfillment when practiced moderately, but requires systemic safeguards to prevent its evolution into a predatory addiction cycle.

1. Emotional Value Mechanism

- Stress Relief: 58% of Gen Z buyers report reduced anxiety through the "mini dopamine rush" of unboxing (McKinsey, 2023). Brands like Sanrio amplify this via nostalgic IPs (e.g., Hello Kitty mystery boxes).

- Social Bonding: 41% join trading communities (e.g., Sonny Angel Discord groups), transforming solitary consumption into collective experiences.

2. Addiction Red Flags

- Neurochemical Hijacking: The 1:72 hidden odds ratio triggers compulsive buying – 63% purchase ≥5 boxes per session chasing rare items (China Consumer Council).

- Youth Vulnerability: Minors exhibit 2.3× higher repurchase rates than adults, with 22% using lunch money for blind boxes (Shanghai Education Bureau).

Response

- "Let consumers decide!" → 72% regret overspending post-unboxing (Tencent Research), proving impaired self-regulation under dopamine surges.

- "Regulation kills fun!" → POP MART’s EU sales rose 24% after adopting probability disclosures, showing ethical practices enhance brand trust.

Conclusion

Blind boxes aren’t inherently evil – they’re modern society’s "emotional vitamin pills." But like vitamins, overdosing causes harm.

​

Toxic masculinity is not merely a Japanese issue but a global crisis. From school shootings rooted in male entitlement to systemic sexism in workplaces, societies worldwide are pressuring males to act "strong" starting when they are children. Monster serves as a reminder of this universal struggle. By observing how characters are pressured by cultural expectations, the asks the question: Who is the real “monster”? The individuals, or the rigid norms. Japan’s strict gender roles, South Korea’s fights over equality, and movements like #MeToo show this is a global issue. In Monster, the teacher is forced to act “tough,” and students are bullied for being “weak.” This happens in schools worldwide. The film teaches us that harmful masculinity isn’t just personal—it’s a system that society supports.

From what I understand, Monster shows that harmful masculinity is like a trap: it forces people to follow unfair rules, hurting both the bullied and the bullies. And here are my points:

1. Schools Push Harmful Rules: In Monster, the school hides the truth about bullying to protect its image. This happens in real life too. For example, when the teacher Yori is forced to apologize even though he did nothing wrong, it shows how schools care more about rules than students’ feelings.

2.Violence Breeds More Violence: In the film, Eri is bullied for liking “girly” things, and his father beats him to “make him a man.” Studies show men who follow strict masculinity are more likely to be violent. But the movie offers hope: Eri and Minato become friends in a secret hideout. There, they can cry, laugh, and be themselves—free from society’s rules. This reminds us that gender is a choice, not a prison.

At last, the movie ends with a flood and the boys vanishing from school and home. They disappeared within the rain and ran toward freedom—a Utopia. This thought—provoking open ending release some hope. Therefore, we can and must create a world where everyone can be themselves.

Monster doesn’t blame individuals. Instead, it blames the invisible “monster” of harmful masculinity—a problem in schools, families, and laws worldwide. To defeat it, we must teach boys that kindness is strength, and emotions are human. The movie’s message is clear: Real courage is being yourself, not acting “manly.”

continuous widening of the wealth gap in China. More precious resources such as wealth and privileges are in the hands of the rich. However, in order to obtain one-thousandth of those precious resources, most ordinary people keep striving. They even going beyond their limits, thus getting trapped in "involution". Not to mention that there are also some "invisible people" in society. They earn meager incomes, don't receive reasonable resource allocation, and bear huge life pressures. Therefore, when the balance of resource allocation is disrupted, the wealthy who are at the top are bound to face accusations from others.

On the other hand, at present, China's economic growth rate has slowed down, while the unemployment rate has increased and the aging population has intensified. All of these brought heavy pressure to the society and made people have negative emotions. In contrast, the wealthy are less affected, and thus a sense of unfairness begins to germinate in people's minds.

Not only that, in the current era of advanced information dissemination,there aremany newsreportsaboutthe rich obtaining power and resources through improper means, such as corruption and embezzlement. The extensive publicity by the media and the close attention of the public have further intensified people's resentment towards the rich.

From a deeper perspective, the intensification of the mentality of hating the rich reflects the increased sense of insecurity among the people and the growing distrust of the upper classes.

We should all understand that the intensification of the phenomenon of resenting the rich is not so much a projection of people's negative emotions. But people's concern about fairness, the integrity and justice of the upper authorities. Correspondingly, the government needs to vigorously implement relevant policies, such as rationally allocating taxes, combating corruption and establishing a social security guarantee system. In this way,the public's trust in the superstructure can be enhanced, the society will be more stable, and the penomenon of rsenting the rich willalso decrease accordingly.

Background:

Mobile games are now ubiquitous in daily life, accessible via smartphones with popular titles like "Candy Crush" and "Pokémon Go". They can be a source of stress - relief when played moderately. Yet excessive gaming brings problems such as health issues and disrupted life balance. Views on them vary widely, with some seeing cognitive benefits and others fearing addiction, sparking debate on developers' responsibilities.

Core viewpoint:

Mobile games are an exceptional way of relaxation. Here I will explain it from three aspects:

Evidence:

Numerous data points and real - world examples illustrate how mobile games serve as an effective relaxation method.

Firstly, in terms of academic or work - related stress, studies show that students and young professionals often face intense pressure. On average, young adults aged 18 - 25 spend about 9-11 hours daily on study or work tasks. Mobile games like "Honor of Kings" provide a quick outlet. Its short - duration matches allow players to unwind during brief breaks, resetting their minds before returning to demanding responsibilities.

Secondly, mobile games fulfill a crucial social need. In today’s fast - paced and isolating world, many struggle to maintain real - world relationships. Research shows 65% of mobile gamers use multiplayer games for social interaction. Games like "Among Us" let players bond remotely, breaking down barriers of distance and time. In - game collaboration satisfies social cravings, offering a sense of connection and relaxation.

What's more, Mobile games offer cognitive and emotional relaxation. Puzzle games engage the mind, diverting attention from stress in a focused, meditative way. Immersive role - playing games provide an escape into alternate worlds, allowing players to shed negative emotions. Through interaction and imagination, these games effectively relieve stress and rejuvenate the mind.

Potential respond:Some may argue that mobile games are addictive and thus not a healthy form of relaxation. However, addiction is more about individual self - control rather than the nature of the games. Additionally, most popular games now come with built - in features like playtime reminders and time limits. As long as individuals are aware of their usage and set boundaries, mobile games can remain a purely positive and effective relaxation method.

Invitation:

Are there other aspects like game genre or the time of day of playing that could impact the relaxation effect of mobile games?Please tell me your experience about using your phone for relaxation or decadence. I'm pleased to have a deep discussion with you.

Here’s what I think: if someone intentionally hurts others (like in cases of narcissistic abuse), we shouldn’t waste energy trying to fix them. But if someone is unintentionally causing harm and also struggling, maybe they deserve our patience and support—if we have the capacity to offer it.

Change shouldn’t be demanded. It should be chosen.

🔍 Have you ever tried to change someone? Did it work?

💭 Or was there a moment you realized: “This person will never change”?

Let’s talk.

Danny Kaye said :“To travel is to take a journey to yourself.” Firstly we have a heart with curiosity to explore the world when we are young. In travel, we meet different landscape and people, which help us to form philosophy of life and worldview. Secondly, when we are young, you are full of physical strength and energy, and you can better enjoy various activities during travel. Some people may think young people not have enough money to travel, but young people are often more comfortable with the uncertainty and changes in travel, and this flexibility can be very useful when traveling. Traveling frugally or luxuriously is not as precious as traveling in youth. Last but not least, traveling is a great way to relax and can help us to release stress at work and life, especially, in nowadays, everyone has heavy pressures in life, we need to find good ways to relax ourselves.

All in all, being younger may have more time and energy to travel, but at the same time, you need to be financially prepared for the future. So, please share your opinions of this topic🥹. Do you think you should travel more or save more money when you’re younger？I want to hear something from you.😉

Personally, I lean toward dogs, but I also appreciate cats for their distinct charm. Dogs are known for their unwavering loyalty and emotional connection with humans. They greet you enthusiastically after a long day, encourage physical activity through walks and play, and often serve as protectors. Their social nature makes them excellent companions for families or individuals seeking constant interaction. However, dogs require significant time, training, and care, which can be demanding for busy people.

On the other hand, cats are independent, graceful, and relatively low-maintenance. They don’t need walks or constant attention, making them ideal for those with a more relaxed or busy lifestyle. Their affectionate moments—like purring on your lap—feel earned, which many owners find rewarding. Yet, their aloofness can sometimes be mistaken for indifference, and not everyone enjoys their unpredictable moods.

Interestingly, studies suggest that dog people tend to be more extroverted, while cat lovers often identify as introverted. This correlation highlights how our pet preferences might mirror our personalities.

Ultimately, the choice between cats and dogs depends on individual needs and lifestyles. While I prefer dogs for their companionship and energy, I completely understand why others adore cats. Both bring joy, comfort, and unique benefits to our lives.

What about you? Are you Team Cat or Team Dog? Share your thoughts! 🐱🐶

Many people experience the frustrating phenomenon of waking up exhausted despite getting a full night’s sleep—or even oversleeping. This issue is increasingly relevant in modern society, where sleep quality is often compromised by stress, screen time, and irregular schedules. While sleep is essential for physical and mental restoration, simply sleeping for long hours does not always guarantee feeling refreshed.

This topic is worth exploring because chronic fatigue despite adequate sleep can significantly impact productivity, mood, and overall health. Understanding the underlying causes can help individuals improve their sleep hygiene and well-being.

Possible Explanations & Existing Debates

1. Sleep Quality vs. Quantity

Some experts argue that the quality of sleep (deep, uninterrupted cycles) matters more than the duration. Poor sleep quality, caused by factors like sleep apnea or frequent awakenings, can leave people feeling unrested.

Others suggest that oversleeping (hypersomnia) itself may disrupt circadian rhythms, leading to grogginess.

2. Medical Conditions

Sleep disorders (e.g., insomnia, restless leg syndrome) or health issues (e.g., anemia, thyroid problems) can cause persistent fatigue.

Mental health conditions like depression and anxiety are also linked to non-restorative sleep, regardless of duration.

3. Lifestyle & Environmental Factors

Poor diet, lack of exercise, and excessive caffeine/alcohol intake may interfere with sleep recovery.

Blue light exposure from screens before bed can suppress melatonin, reducing sleep quality.

4. Psychological & Societal Factors

Chronic stress and burnout can make sleep less restorative, even if the duration is sufficient.

Some researchers debate whether societal pressure to be constantly productive leads people to misinterpret normal tiredness as a sleep problem.

In recent years, there have been many incidents of animal abuse, such as the "high-heeled shoe cat-stomping incident" and the "cat-burning incident." These events have attracted widespread social attention. The issue of animal protection is not only related to ethics and morality but also closely connected to public health, international trade, and social harmony. Currently, China does not have a Animal Protection Law. The existing laws and regulations are mostly focused on specific areas and lack comprehensiveness.

My viewpoint: China should establish a unified Animal Protection Law.

1. Ethics and Morality:

Traditional Chinese ethics include the idea of "compassion for life," but this is not fully reflected in the current laws. By enacting laws to prohibit animal abuse, we can promote traditional Chinese virtues and enhance social spiritual civilization.

2. Public Health and Safety:

Animal diseases pose a threat to public health, such as H1N1 and avian influenza. By enacting laws to strengthen animal management, we can reduce the spread of diseases and ensure food safety.

3. Social Order and Harmony:

Animal abuse can cause social dissatisfaction and instability, such as violent confrontations in some areas due to dog-culling incidents. By enacting laws to protect animals, we can promote social harmony and improve China's international image.

4. Economy and International Trade:

China is the world's largest animal producer, but in recent years, exports of animal products have faced animal welfare standards barriers. Establishing an Animal Protection Law can help overcome these barriers and improve the quality of animal products.

5. Improving the Legal System:

The current animal protection laws and regulations in China are not systematic, lacking a comprehensive basic law. Enacting a unified Animal Protection Law can clarify the legal status of animals and improve the animal protection legal system.

I wonder what’s your thoughts about this topic ?

1. Issue Description

In recent years, the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has enabled students to effortlessly complete homework using tools like ChatGPT and Homework Helper (e.g., "Zuoyebang" in China). This phenomenon has sparked widespread debate: **Is it ethical for students to use AI to complete their homework?

On one hand, AI tools can swiftly solve math problems, draft essay outlines, or even generate programming code, significantly improving efficiency. Proponents argue that AI serves as an "intelligent assistant" that helps students overcome knowledge gaps. On the other hand, critics warn that overreliance on AI may erode students’ independent thinking skills and lead to issues like plagiarism and academic dishonesty. Additionally, educational inequality could worsen—students with access to advanced technology may widen the gap with those who lack such resources.

The core of this controversy lies in: **How should the role of AI in education be defined? Is it a tool or a replacement?** This question demands thorough exploration, as it concerns the essence of education, fairness, and future talent development models.

2. Stance and Arguments

**Position: AI can serve as a learning aid, but its scope and methods of use must be strictly regulated.

First, the responsible use of AI can address shortcomings in traditional education. For instance, AI can provide personalized exercises for students’ weak areas (e.g., Khan Academy’s adaptive learning) or correct grammatical errors in language learning. Research shows that students who moderately use AI assistance improve problem-solving accuracy by 30% (Journal of Educational Technology, 2023).

However, relying entirely on AI for homework is perilous. The goal of education is not merely to obtain answers but to cultivate critical thinking and problem-solving skills. If students use AI to directly generate essays or math answers, they miss opportunities for deep learning. For example, a Stanford University experiment found that students who depended on AI tools long-term exhibited significant declines in complex analytical abilities.

Addressing Counterarguments:

Some argue that "tools are neutral," claiming the issue lies in users’ self-discipline. However, adolescents’ self-control is still developing, requiring educators to establish clear rules. For instance, schools could mandate that "AI may only be used for brainstorming drafts or error correction, not for generating final submissions," while employing technical measures (e.g., AI detection software) to monitor misuse.

Guangdong University of Foreign Studies (GDUFS), though not a top-ranked institution in China, exemplifies how a strong specialized program can outweigh university prestige. Its niche language majors consistently produce graduates with high employment rates in globally recognized companies like Huawei or international organizations. These students often outperform peers from higher-ranked universities in generic majors, thanks to tailored curricula, industry partnerships, and immersive language training. For instance, GDUFS’ Southeast Asian language alumni dominate regional trade roles, leveraging language skills that elite universities rarely prioritize. This proves that specialized expertise, rather than institutional ranking, drives career success in competitive fields.

As far as I am concerned, English for General Academic Purposes should not be a compulsory course for freshmen in GDUFS due to its high difficulty, heavy workload relative to limited class time, and low practicality for non -English majors in daily life.

First of all, the content of the academic English course is excessively difficult with an overwhelming workload. We only have one class per week, during which we need to do presentations, receive teacher feedback, take tests, and so on. This leaves very little time for actual instruction. However, the course materials are extensive, and teachers often can't cover everything in class. Meanwhile, there's a heavy load of assignments that largely depend on our self-study abilities. While some students can keep up, others struggle significantly. What's more, this isn't even our major course, yet the workload sometimes exceeds that of some core major courses, resulting in considerable assignment pressure for us.

Additionally, The language used in academic English is highly specialized and formal, and the expressions learned are rarely applicable in daily conversations, making it seem like a waste of time for non -English majors. Non - English majors may have more urgent needs to improve practical skills such as oral English for business or travel, rather than mastering academic writing and reading.

There is no doubt that some might argue that academic English can enhance students' overall English proficiency and open up more academic opportunities in the future. However, for non - English majors, the cost - benefit ratio is low. The time and energy spent on struggling with academic English could be better allocated to developing skills that are more directly beneficial to their future professional development. Moreover, if they need academic English skills in the future, they can choose to take it as an elective course at an appropriate time.While academic English may improve general proficiency, the same goals could be achieved through more practical courses like 'Critical Reading and Discussion,' which combines language skills with real-world applications.

Given the high difficulty, heavy workload, and limited practical value for non -English majors, English for General Academic Purposes should not be a compulsory course for freshmen in GDUFS. It would be more beneficial to offer it as an elective option instead.Data from student feedback and comparative studies of peer institutions further support this recommendation. It would be more beneficial to offer it as an elective option with tailored difficulty levels, allowing students to focus on skills directly relevant to their majors and career aspirations.

    However,I firmly believe that pursuing a master's degree is a more advantageous choice for personal and professional development.
    Firstly, a postgraduate degree provides in-depth knowledge and expertise in a specific field. In a rapidly evolving technological and economic landscape, specialized skills make graduates more competitive in the job market. For example, in fields like artificial intelligence and data science, advanced education often leads to higher-paying positions and more opportunities for career advancement. Besides, in this credential inflation society, a higher degree is tended to be needed in the job market, from which we can say to purse a higher degree is a more promising choice and it can guarantee your future development, compared to immediately step into the work force, which seems to get return more rapidly at first.

    Secondly, postgraduate study offers a unique environment for personal growth. It exposes students to academic research, critical thinking, and collaborative projects, all of which enhance problem-solving abilities and innovation. Additionally, the network built during postgraduate study, including interactions with professors and fellow students, can open doors to future career opportunities and collaborations. University also plays a role as a protector, it prevents students from the sudden impact of society, providing them with more time and space to plan for their future. However, someone may call it an escape from the society, and regard it as a behavior of coward. But, university not only plays as a protector, it also teaches students how to face and handle those problems, so the people who choose to pursue master degree can not only gain knowledge, but also gain a protector. 

While immediate employment may provide financial stability, the long-term benefits of postgraduate education, such as higher earning potential, better job security, and access to leadership positions, far outweigh the short-term gains. In conclusion, despite the challenges and costs involved, choosing to pursue a master's degree is an investment in one's future that can lead to greater success and fulfillment in both professional and personal life.

So, what do you think? Would you like to purse a master degree or step into the workforce? And if you would like to step into the workforce, do you think continue to chase for a master degree is an escape from the society and a behavior of a coward?

In my perspective,I think it depends on certain situation and major.To be specific,majors that focus on academic research are supposed to keep this measurement while those focusing on practice are sopposed to cancel it and replace it with other measurement like exam and internship experience.Let's dive deeper into it logically.For instant,if you major in mathmatic and diving into such researches will be your mianly task then I think there is no better ways of measurement than a piece of papers becuase this is the final output in his/hers future research.But when it comes to more practical majors like business English,I'm firmly convinced that it's rediculous to ask them to write thesis out of a major that places emphasis on communication.Instead,internship experience might be the better way to quantify one's study situation.Let's pay attention to some data.According to Linkedin,73 percents of employer hold a perspective that internship experience and professional skills are over ability of writing a essay.In summary, request of senior thesis are sopposed to be cancelled on practical majors but saved on academic majors.

Welcome to add your valued opinions to my passage. Share your idea on whether undergraduates should have senior thesis.

This trend has also brought up heated debate, and it makes people reflect on their own financial management. Some people think that we earn money for a better life, but in fact we should spend it to realize a better life, and money is something you should spend while you’ve got it. However some people argue that we should save money for a rainy day, which means setting aside money for unexpected financial hardships, and they also claim that it is wrong to prioritize short-term enjoyment over long-term security.

As far as I’m concerned, these two choices both make a lot of sense, but I certainly think that saving money for a rainy day is necessary. Life is full of uncertainty. Just like it is said in the movie: “life was like a box of chocolates, you never know what you’re gonna get.” Keeping a “rainy day fund” is crucial for unexpected expenses and emergencies like medical emergencies, major repairs, or even kidnaps. It’ll be much more tricky if you bump into any of these cases without an emergency fund. For example, a sudden car repair ($500–$2,000) or medical bill could force someone into debt if unprepared. A 2023 Bankrate survey found that 57% of Americans cannot afford a $1,000 emergency expense. Without savings, people may rely on high-interest credit cards or loans, worsening debt, especially when encounter such problems like job loss. So from my perspective, saving for emergencies is crucial for long-term financial stability. However, if we put the majority of our money into this emergency fund, we may not have the chance to spend our money on other things like a concert of your idol, a pair of shoes you’ve been wanting or anything else that may entertain you . Being too conservative isn't good either. We might lose many chances because of that. I think the most important thing is that we need to make good plans for our spending so that you won’t get into hot water for running out of money and will have the chance to enjoy your own life.

All in all, these two choices have their own pros and cons. What’s your opinion on this problem? Do you agree that we should save money for a rainy day or you think that you can’t take the money with you and should spend it while you’ve got it?🤔 Feel free to discuss and give your own view!!🤗🤗

Background: Most of the students from university nowadays are suffering from attending classes that hardly build relationships with their major classes. What can be frustrating is if they don’t finish the study of the courses, they might not be able to earn the criteria. For example, I am an English student myself but somehow have to learn Maths. Besides, I am only during my first year of college but I have to study career developing courses.

Reason: As far as I know, many students are suffering from studying these watered-down classes. They do not gain helpful knowledge and it can be a waste of time to attend classes instead of doing things they want to. Students are trapped inside a cage.

Views: Supporters argue that these courses can serve as a restriction of the over-free atmosphere of the college while teaching them how to develop from different aspect. Critic contend that watered-down courses waste students’ energy and stops them from exploring further.

Stance:

I think watered-down classed should be cancelled.

Students should have more time to broaden their horizons using their spare time, but not to waste their time sitting in classroom and listening to those hollow content. It is mentally tortured.

1. Evidence from Cognitive Science
   Research in cognitive science has shown that learning is most effective when it is self-directed and relevant to personal interests. For example, a study published in the Journal of Educational Psychology found that students who engaged in self-directed learning activities outside the classroom showed a 30% improvement in knowledge retention compared to those who relied solely on classroom lectures. This suggests that allowing students to explore topics of their own choosing in their spare time can lead to deeper and more lasting learning.

2. Data on Classroom Engagement
   A survey conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics revealed that only 40% of students reported feeling engaged during traditional classroom lectures. In contrast, students who participated in experiential learning activities or pursued independent projects reported significantly higher levels of engagement and satisfaction. This indicates that traditional classroom settings, especially those with hollow content, fail to capture students' attention and can lead to mental fatigue.

3. Logical Reasoning
   In today's rapidly evolving world, the ability to adapt and innovate is crucial. By spending more time on self-directed learning and exploration, students can develop these skills more effectively. For instance, students who engage in independent research or creative projects are more likely to develop critical thinking and problem-solving abilities, which are essential for future success. In contrast, sitting through classes with hollow content does little to enhance these skills and can even lead to a sense of mental torture.

Some may argue that traditional classroom settings provide a structured environment that is essential for learning. However, this argument overlooks the fact that structure alone does not guarantee effective learning. The quality of content and the engagement of students are far more important. Moreover, modern educational technologies and resources offer alternative ways to provide structure while still allowing for self-directed learning. For example, online courses and interactive learning platforms can provide structured learning experiences tailored to individual needs, without the drawbacks of hollow classroom content.

So how do you feel about these courses? Do you think it should be cancelled?

2.Many young people always get trapped in an emotional or affective predicament. At this time, they want something fine to comfort themselves. Temples, which symbolize blessings, have become great places for them to make good wishes and comfort their hearts, although they may be not really need to go there. Even some people go to temples just want to follow the trend. And in my opinion, contacting astrology is a way to explain why we feel some emotion and do some things. You can also know that the introduce of 12 astrology are all “fit” us. When we do something that is not understood or show emotions that are not understood, we might say, "My astrology sign tells me that I am this kind of person." Is that really ture? I don’t think so.

3.Merely believing in metaphysics to console oneself is not a good way to relieve stress. To truly solve troubles and change the current situation, one still needs to rely on reflection and action. Metaphysics can only temporarily relieve tension and pressure. From the perspective of astrology, the personality analyses provided are basically the commonalities of human personalities, and most of them will make us empathize with them, thus trusting them.By comparison, we can see that not only our own zodiac sign, but also we ourselves sometimes feel that we are in line with the personality traits of other zodiac signs. So, constellations can be trusted, but not completely. Some online bloggers, such as "Tao Baibai", offer reminders about "weekly horoscope". Such information can be regarded as small reminders, just like life tips.

4.So, what’s your astrology? And do you accept it?

These days, the MBTI(Myers-Briggs Type Indicator) is getting trendy on the internet. More and more young people start introducing themselves with the additional explanation of their own “MBTI”,believing that others will receive more specific and accurate information about “who I am” through the brief four letters.

The Myer-Briggs Type Indicator, or MBTI, is often used to help individuals understand their communication preferences and how they interact with others, making it ideal especially when figuring out their optimum work style and reaction in different situations. 

 With each test ranging about 93 forced-choice questions, you’d have to rank all the different statement accordingly which ultimately results in measuring (1) your extroverted or introverted level, (2) whether you’ve a sensing preference or an intuitive preference when it comes to processing information, (3) your preference in making decisions by thinking or feeling, and (4) if you’ve a judging or perceiving preference when doing things.

So the fact is that not long ago, I rested the “MBTI”, and surprisingly found that I have change from “INFJ” to “ESFP”,which indicates that my personality will vary in different periods. However, this probably went beyond the common sense that everyone is born with her/his own fixed characteristics.

While many of us are drawn to the simple explanation and nature, the debate about this personality test type is that it’s too rigid in its category and isn’t the most accurate in results. 

Studies have shown that it may be unreliable because you’re more than likely to have a different result should you retake the test a few months later. Additionally, Programme Director and Lecturer of Taylor’s Bachelor of Psychology Ms. Rajalakshmi Ganesan, shares, "A good and accurate personality test wouldn't show a different result when you retake the test as it's rare for a person's personality to change."

Therefore we may fail to know completely about the true-self by only confirming our “MBTI” because actually our personalities do flow under the changing conditions: how we reflect with the surroundings and how the environment reshapes us will, definitely, be key points toward the final composition of “who we are”.

Still we can acquire something useful through the lengthy process of contemplating on each question : Am I fond of participating in the parties while surrounded by all my friends or preferring staying alone with a book in hand to read? By answering the given questions, we may be able to better know ourselves in some regards.

As for my personal experience , I felt myself strangely demonstrating more interest in socializing with people than before (after I have become a “esfp”), and also seemingly equipped with enormous energy and confidence. And I decide to give all of these amazing changes credit to the label “esfp” . Here comes the whole story: After being informed of my new “mbti”, I research it on the “red notebook” to obtain more knowledge of this personality——“just living for the moment”“enthusiastic about knowing someone new”……Under this kind of psychological suggestion, I gradually and unconsciously act in alignment with the “stereotype” of “esfp”.

In a nutshell , I strongly suggest  utilizing the “mbti test” to motivate us towards being an ideal vision of ourselves. Meanwhile, we’d better stay aware of its limit on fully illustrate ourselves in a broad depiction. None of us could ever be simply defined because we are all growing in a spiral rise.

Have you ever done the mbti test?

Do you think it can properly represent who you are?

How do you make of the application of mbti on some certain job interview?

For example, instead of saying, "I’m overjoyed!" people now just write "LOL" or "I’m dead." Classic poetry like "The moon shines over both lands, though we are apart（青山一道同云雨，明月何曾是两乡）" is replaced with simple phrases like "Stay strong!" or "Let’s go!" This trend, called "Internet Aphasia," means people struggle to find the right words when they need them most.

My opinion：Internet memes make communication faster, but they also make our language skills weaker.

Supporting Points:

1. Limited Vocabulary: Using the same slang over and over reduces our word choices.

2. Less Emotional Depth: Memes often oversimplify feelings. For example, "This is fire!" can’t fully describe something truly amazing.

3. Difficulty in Formal Situations: If we only know internet slang, writing essays, giving speeches, or even job interviews becomes harder.

Some say memes help people bond and express ideas quickly. While that’s true, we shouldn’t let them replace rich, meaningful language entirely.

What do you think?

- Do memes make communication easier or just lazier?

- Have you ever struggled to find the right words because of internet slang?

- How can we balance fun memes and good language skills?

Let’s discuss! 🚀

Background:
Nowadays, with the development of technology, an increasing number of people believe that language learning is not as important as it once was. Instead, there is growing emphasis on interdisciplinary studies—particularly for minority language learners—through the concept of "languages +." This trend explains why Guangdong University of Foreign Studies (GDUFS) has introduced dual-degree programs. However, language majors at the undergraduate level now face a dilemma: How should they balance their time between mastering languages and studying other disciplines?

Different Perspectives:

Some argue that technology could replace human translators, claiming that machines make fewer errors than humans. They suggest students abandon language studies entirely and focus solely on other fields. Others contend that language learners should prioritize improving their critical discussion and translation skills to maintain irreplaceability, while only acquiring basic knowledge of a secondary discipline to cultivate uniqueness.

2.MY OPINION

In my opinion, language proficiency—an indispensable tool for cross-cultural communication—and interdisciplinary knowledge are inseparable; neither should be neglected. The allocation of study time should be adjusted according to different learning phases. During the foundational stage, prioritizing language acquisition is crucial, requiring dedicated time to master grammar, vocabulary, and core communicative competencies. At the advanced stage, however, learners should progressively integrate a secondary discipline by studying its content through the target language while simultaneously exploring its cultural context.For instance, an Italian Studies major could dedicate Years 1-2 to mastering morphological structures and sociolinguistic registers, followed by applying this linguistic competence in Years 3-4 to critically examine Made in Italy industrial clusters or conduct textual analysis of Renaissance humanism treatises.

What do you think about it?Let's discuss it!

I chose this topic because it’s not just my personal headache — it’s something students everywhere seem to face. Group work is a common method used by universities across the globe. The goal is good: to train students in teamwork, communication, and responsibility. But the actual experience often brings stress instead of growth. According to a 2023 survey in the UK, over 65% of students said group work gave them more pressure than learning. Clearly, the gap between what group work is supposed to do and what it really does is growing.

At first, it seems like the main problem is the people in the group — someone doesn’t do their part, someone disappears, and someone always argues. But the truth is, these problems have always existed. So why do today’s students complain more than before? Maybe the answer lies deeper. Most of today’s college students are part of Generation Z. We grew up with the internet, short videos, fast feedback, and more personal control over what and how we learn. We’re used to working independently and getting results quickly. Group work, however, is slow, full of compromise, and often feels unorganized. It’s not that we don’t want to work with others — it’s that the way group work is designed doesn’t fit how we learn and think.

What’s worse, many group assignments don’t have clear systems. In the real world, teams have leaders, roles, deadlines, and performance checks. But in school, everyone is “equal” — which usually means some do all the work while others do almost nothing but get the same grade. Over time, this unfairness kills motivation and makes students dislike working together even more.

Group work was meant to help us grow. But when it causes more trouble than learning, maybe it’s time to change the way it works. Teachers can include peer evaluations, allow more choice in group members, or give students basic training in teamwork. With better design and understanding, group work doesn’t have to be a nightmare. It can still be a chance to learn — not just about the subject, but about working with others in a smarter way.

I chose to discuss emojis in online communication，as for me, a young person, I rely heavily on emojis and memes to express my thoughts and feelings. However, I’ve noticed that excessive use of emojis might weaken my ability to articulate thoughts in words. Research supports this concern, showing that over-reliance on visual symbols can impact language skills and critical thinking.

📊 Statistics: A study found that 90% of young internet users (18-29 years old) use emojis daily.

📱 Example: Instead of typing “That’s funny!”, many friends who talked with me now just send 😂.

🎭 Meme Culture: Memes and emojis dominate platforms like Instagram and TikTok, where visuals often replace text.

🌍 Global Trend: In Japan, emojis originated from kaomoji (e.g., (＾▽＾)), while in the West, they evolved into standardized symbols like 👍 and ❤️.

Global Significance of the Issue

✅ Pros:

Break language barriers (e.g., a smiley 😊 is understood worldwide). It can help to speed up conversations in fast-paced digital spaces.

❌ Cons:

Using heavy emoji will reduce vocabulary in teens. Also, a ❤️ could mean love, friendship, or sarcasm, depending on context.

My Perspective

While emojis enhance efficiency, overusing them harms critical thinking and self-expression.

Evidence & Reasoning:

1. Decline in Language Skills

I used to write detailed messages, but now I often replace sentences with 🫠 (melting face) or 💀 (dying of laughter). Obviously, students who frequently used emojis struggled more with essay writing than those who didn’t.

2. Loss of Nuance

Instead of explaining why I’m upset, I might send 😠. This skips self-reflection and deep communication.

3. Dependence on Visual Crutches

Memes and emojis are like “fast food” for communication, which is convenient but not nutritious for intellectual growth. Some say emojis add emotional depth. However, they shouldn’t replace words entirely.

Conclusion:

Emojis are useful tools, but we should practice expressing complex ideas in our own words while using emojis as supplements, not substitutes. Otherwise, we risk losing the ability to think critically and communicate deeply. Maybe , next time you want to send 😅, try typing “I’m embarrassed but laughing it off” instead.

Nowadays, a new type of social anxiety——Moments Anxiety is silently permeating the daily lives of countless individuals. According to a 2023 Pew Research study, 72% of global social media users report feeling "emotionally drained" after prolonged scrolling. Platforms like Instagram and WeChat Moments amplify this phenomenon by showcasing idealized lifestyles, travel photos, and career achievements, fostering unhealthy social comparison.

Why are we anxious about other’s highlight reels on Moments? Though people joked, “A finely decorated Wechat Moments, but a raw and unpolished real life,” many people will unconsciously fall into the emotional spell of comparison while seeing others’ wonderful lives, their progress, and their new stages of their lives. The thought of thinking about oneself when seeing others is called the “self-discrepancy theory”. When people see their ideal lives in others’ Wechat Moments, they start to compare them with their “actual lives”, and a sense of disparity naturally arises.

What is the antidote? First, we can close the Moments for a while and just focus on our lives, effectively reducing some anxiety to some extent. Second, stop comparing. The comparison is the thief of joy. Take me as an example. Although I didn't get admitted to my desired university, it's still quite good that I managed to enter an undergraduate college. And even though I don't have a prominent family background, it's already great that my family has given me the best they can within their means. Third, we should realize that people tend to showcase the good aspects of their lives rather than the messy and chaotic ones so they might also be overwhelmed by anxiety and comparation at times.

Join discussions:

Have you ever felt anxious about others’ highlight reels on Wechat Moments? Share your stories!

What actions have you taken to reduce your anxiety and comparisons?

In the realm of universities, the concept of meritocracy has become a hot topic of discussion. Meritocracy, which means rewarding individuals based on their abilities and achievements, is often seen as a driving force for progress and success.

However, it also brings about certain challenges and complexities that we need to carefully examine.On the positive side, meritocracy in universities encourages students to strive for excellence. It creates a competitive environment where students are motivated to study hard, participate actively in various activities, and push their limits to achieve outstanding results.

For example, in academic competitions, students who have a strong sense of meritocracy will spare no effort to prepare and showcase their talents. They believe that their hard work and intelligence will be recognized and rewarded, which in turn drives them to continuously improve themselves and make contributions to the academic community.

Moreover, meritocracy can help universities attract and retain top talents. Professors and researchers who are highly accomplished and have excellent research capabilities are more likely to be attracted to universities that value meritocracy. These outstanding talents can bring advanced knowledge, innovative ideas, and high-quality research projects to the university, thereby enhancing the university's academic reputation and research level. At the same time, meritocracy also provides opportunities for students to interact with these top talents, which is conducive to the exchange and dissemination of knowledge and the cultivation of students' innovative thinking.

However, there are also some potential problems with meritocracy in universities. One of the issues is that it may lead to excessive competition and stress among students. In the pursuit of high grades, awards, and honors, some students may feel overwhelmed and anxious. They may constantly compare themselves with others and worry about not being able to meet the high standards set by meritocracy. This excessive stress can have a negative impact on their mental and physical health, and may even lead to a loss of interest in learning and a sense of burnout.

Another problem is that meritocracy may not always take into account the diversity and complexity of individuals. Some students may have unique talents and perspectives that are not easily measured by traditional standards of meritocracy. For example, a student who is passionate about social issues and has a strong sense of social responsibility may not necessarily excel in academic grades or standardized tests. However, their contributions to society and their potential for future development should not be overlooked. If universities only focus on the narrow definition of meritocracy, they may miss out on these valuable talents and limit the diversity and creativity of the academic community.

In conclusion, while we recognize the challenges and potential negative aspects of meritocracy in universities, we should not be pessimistic or give up on the pursuit of excellence. Instead, we should adopt a more grounded and balanced approach. Universities should strive to create a supportive and inclusive environment that not only values meritocracy but also takes into account the diverse needs and talents of students. We should encourage students to work hard and strive for success, but also remind them to pay attention to their own well-being and to find their own unique paths. By combining meritocracy with a sense of compassion and understanding, we can build a better academic community where everyone has the opportunity to thrive and contribute to the greater good.