Crisis in Japan by

2024-07-16 02:42:02 UTC

I was the civilian government. I had to consider the relations of other countries and the people. And avoiding any war.

2024-07-16 02:42:15 UTC

i was representing the military. I had to consider what would benefit the military more as that is my main priority

2024-07-16 02:42:27 UTC

The militarist government. We decided on our options based on how it would impact the people in japan eg. would they support us or would they think of our gov as weak

2024-07-16 02:42:46 UTC

the continue war in china because both options would either mean waging a war or the civilians hating the government

2024-07-16 02:42:50 UTC

I had to pick which side benefitted my faction more

Ryan

2024-07-16 02:43:13 UTC

Seiyukai Faction. I chose the option that was related to choosing peace rather than violence.

2024-07-16 02:43:23 UTC

Civilian government. We had to choose wisely and not cause any warw

2024-07-16 02:43:23 UTC

The attack on pearl harbor

nethra

2024-07-16 02:43:40 UTC

army faction. i decided between a and b considering how the army would be affected by the decisions i would make.

2024-07-16 02:44:09 UTC

Civilian government.

I had to consider which option benefited the civilian government.

Chloe

2024-07-16 02:44:41 UTC

Naval Faction. Being the military government our choices was always to choose the one that would expand the country

2024-07-16 02:44:50 UTC

i was part of the navy faction and i chose whatever benefitted my faction and reduced democracy

2024-07-16 02:45:00 UTC

I was the civilian government. I had to consider what choice would increase democracy and resources, trying not to have any wars

2024-07-16 02:45:08 UTC

starting the 2nd sino japanese war it was difficult due to the reparations we would face after starting the war

2024-07-16 02:45:15 UTC

I do not agree. Because the military were doing this to control more land and power and not because of resources

2024-07-16 02:45:23 UTC

the occupation of French Indochina as we would make the French our enemies

2024-07-16 02:45:26 UTC

My role was the civilian govt.

The way I decided between the 2 choices was to see which benefit my role. When the cards has democracy, i played higher power cards.

Ryan

2024-07-16 02:45:41 UTC

US Oil Embargo.There was a lot of losses on either options which would effect both factions.

david_low_shiliang — 2024-07-16 02:45:51 UTC

I was representing the military and before choosing a or b, I had to consider the resources wasted and not focus solely on destroying democracy

2024-07-16 02:45:55 UTC

I was the military faction and i took control by taking a balanced approach to gain resources and grab the expansionist opportunities to conquer more cities.

2024-07-16 02:45:56 UTC

No. Japan was more in a conquering mindset and they wanted what was the best for their country and wanted Japan to be the "best"

2024-07-16 02:46:01 UTC

i disagree. they waged war as

they wanted more power

2024-07-16 02:46:32 UTC

the ending cards as there was limited options

Ajeesh

2024-07-16 02:46:55 UTC

I had the military Army faction.

I had to consider whether the option would affect democracy, and reduce resources, while making sure I can increase territorial advancement.

Ajeesh

2024-07-16 02:48:58 UTC

I disagree. Japan wanted to gain power and territorial advancement, hence was not forced, but wanted to increase militarism.

david_low_shiliang — 2024-07-16 02:50:08 UTC

I agree, they were forced. They do not have enough resources to sustain their large industrial capacity therefore they had to invade other nations for their natural resources such as timber.

2024-07-16 02:51:41 UTC

The attack on pearl harbor was the most difficult to decide on. As it was one of the last cards , we didnt have much options to choose from

2024-07-16 02:51:50 UTC

The attack on pearl harbour, as it was one of the last events, there were little resources so if the military were to attack we would lose, and also we were left with only 1 power card to use

Ajeesh

2024-07-16 02:51:54 UTC

The US Oil Embargo, as it would either mean that more resources are lost, or democracy could either decrease or increase rapidly, hence creating a ‘risky’ decision.