<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Compare and contrast: Presidential and Parliamentary Democracies. by </title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/keberly7/99ehd1keexjvo1dn</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2024-02-29 17:14:19 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2024-02-29 17:30:38 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Parlimentary vs. Presidential.</title>
         <author>keberly7</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/keberly7/99ehd1keexjvo1dn/wish/2900950270</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>SIMILARITIES;</p><p>-Both can exercise executive power. </p><p>-Both have multiple political parties. </p><p>-Both maintain a head of government. </p><p>-Both maintain a legislative branch. </p><p><br/></p><p>DIFFERENCES; </p><p>-Parliamentary has a Prime minister as head of state, Presidential has a president. </p><p>-In presidential, the presidemt holds no accountability for the legislative branch. </p><p>-The president cannot be dismissed by legislative branch. </p><p>-A presidents term is fixed and often limited. </p><p><br/></p><p>A fact I learned: Despite being a form of a monarchy, the United Kingdom is actually a parliamentary democracy. The royal family are simply historical figureheads for the empire. The King is often referred to as the head of state, however he is not the Prime Minister of the Uk's government. Rishi Sunak is the current Prime Minister. </p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://t4.ftcdn.net/jpg/00/90/49/11/360_F_90491131_Qk1tdff9lNSbhSZ66zv3nfY5Dg9R7XPN.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2024-02-29 17:30:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/keberly7/99ehd1keexjvo1dn/wish/2900950270</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
