https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl label the question your answering. en-us 2020-10-13 14:29:20 UTC 2025-10-24 03:26:29 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.net/icons/png/1f603.png dfallon1_uchs https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/825036166 2020-10-13 14:29:20 UTC https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/825036166 3481362 https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826389577 The duel that they were was the explicit. Because they were testing each others wits by seeing which cup has the poison. The fact that he dies is also explicit. ]]> 2020-10-13 19:21:22 UTC https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826389577 https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826390093 What was implicit was that both the guys were unmatched in physical strength and they were also unmatched in smarts as well. The guy in black was smarter as he knew what the other guy would do. This scene is effective in showing the smarts of the guy in the mask as he predicted the moves of the guy who drank the poison to ensure that he wouldn't die. ]]> 2020-10-13 19:21:31 UTC https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826390093 https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826390430 1) What is explicitly being shown is that there is poison in one of the glasses and they are testing each other. When he overcomplicates the situation he thinks he is winning and describes how he switched the glasses to show he is one step ahead. The other guy speaks very few words so that Vizzini overcomplicates the situation and gives away his technique and thought process only hurting himself in the end. ]]> 2020-10-13 19:21:38 UTC https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826390430 844141 https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826390771 What is being explicitly stated is the duel that they are having to rescue Buttercup. Their is two cups of drink and one of them has poison in it. They are testing each others wits with Vizzini trying to see which cup has the poison by analyzing Westley's choices he made.]]> 2020-10-13 19:21:43 UTC https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826390771 https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826391065 Q1:  what is being explicitly stated is that there is poison in one of the  wine glasses and whoever drinks the poison will lead to death.  This is effective in showing it  because the guy with the black mask says that this poison leads to  death and he takes both glasses and then tells the other guy that one of them has poison in it.

]]> 2020-10-13 19:21:49 UTC https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826391065 https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826391243 What is explicitly being stated is that there is poison in one of the cups and it's a test too see who is smarter then the other. As vizzini over thinks his decision, he confuses not only himself but the audience and when he finally made his decision, he chose wrong. ]]> 2020-10-13 19:21:52 UTC https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826391243 3405853 https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826391513 1.) What was explicit was the man that was poisoned/challenged. He was very explicit on his reasoning  and gave away a lot of knowledge. There was two cups and one was poisoned. While the guy with the mask was implicit as he shared very little reasoning and evidence to make the bald guy confused.]]> 2020-10-13 19:21:57 UTC https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826391513 375875 https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826403670 The bald man's overthinking was explicitly shown, especially through his loud reasoning. Effective since this would lead to the audience to start overthinking as well since he goes through the different possibilities that could happen.]]> 2020-10-13 19:25:51 UTC https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826403670 https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826404036 1) It is explicitly stated that there is poison in one of the glasses, they are testing one another, and they are fighting over a princess. It is also explicitly stated that the man in the black mask has beaten two other men before him, and that Vizzini is over complicating the situation in how he tries to reason out the problem.]]> 2020-10-13 19:25:58 UTC https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826404036 https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826404345 1. It is explicitly stated that it would be a battle of wits, in which one of the cups would have poison and whoever drank said cup would lose. By explicitly stating this, the audience has a better understanding of what was going to be happening in the scene and what they would do in order to determine the winner. ]]> 2020-10-13 19:26:04 UTC https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826404345 https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826404580 1. What is being explicitly stated is that they are fighting over which of the glasses had the poison in it. They are doing it to test each other to see who will get the princess. In the end he only confuses himself and drinks from the wrong cup.]]> 2020-10-13 19:26:09 UTC https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826404580 https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826404719 1.   The scene was effective because it exemplified a battle of wits between the two men. The things explicitly stated were that out of the two goblets one was poisoned. The man would win the challenge if he guessed which goblet had no poison. Choosing the correct cup would mean that he was smarter than the other guy.]]> 2020-10-13 19:26:12 UTC https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826404719 598132 https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826404831 1.) What is explicitly shown in the clip was the bald guy going through his reasoning out loud. It was meant to be confusing to the audience and it does that effectively by making him talk about every option and consider every factor even if they're outlandish.]]> 2020-10-13 19:26:14 UTC https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826404831 https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826405028 1) It was explicitly stated that there was and odorless poison in the wine glass. It was a test to see which one would get the princess.

2) It was implicit stated that vizzini had looked at the situation too much and had over thought his decision]]> 2020-10-13 19:26:18 UTC https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826405028 https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826405130 1) What is being explicitly  stated is that there is poison in one of the two glasses they are going to drink from. This is explicit because they called it out as a game to get the girl.
2) What is being implicitly stated is which cup has the poison in the glass, so that he has a hard time choosing which one. This is implicit because they said that the point of the game is to guess which one has poison, therefore they wouldn't clearly share which one has poison until after they have taken a drink.  ]]> 2020-10-13 19:26:20 UTC https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826405130 https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826405144 What is being implicitly stated is that the man in the black mask has been more clever than the small man through out the duration of the scene.  the man i the black mask knows that the small man is too smart for his own good, so he used his low intellect against him by throwing him into a loophole where the small man is thinking that the man in the mask is tricking him while the man in the mask made it so that the small man would only be tricking himself.

]]> 2020-10-13 19:26:21 UTC https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826405144 https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826405366 1) It is being explicitly stated by the man in black is that one of the two glasses of wine have poison and whoever drinks that glass dies. By saying this it creates suspense making the audience wait to find out who drinks the poison. ]]> 2020-10-13 19:26:25 UTC https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826405366 https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826405843 1) What is implicitly stated was which glass contained the poison and whether each person knew which one it is in and that one was more clever than the other. The intellect of the man with black mask is not as apparent compared to the other man who stated many pieces of evidences. ]]> 2020-10-13 19:26:35 UTC https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826405843 3162991 https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826406276 1) What is explicitly stated is how Vizzini overcomplicated the situation. By overthinking, he has distracted himself from his original line of thought on the masked man's character: he wouldn't give the poison to another man, he would take it himself.]]> 2020-10-13 19:26:41 UTC https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826406276 https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826407401 1:What was explicit is that that the bald man was over thinking the situation by coming up with a variety of scenarios or reasons why the cup pointed at him was poisonous.

]]> 2020-10-13 19:27:05 UTC https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826407401 3572584 https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826407738 1) What is explicitly stated is there is poison in the wine glass. It was effective because it the clear obstacle to who gets the princess. 

2) What is implicit stated was which glass it was in and what the other thought. It was effective because the bad guy had a a lot of reasoning but did not have solid evidence]]> 2020-10-13 19:27:10 UTC https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826407738 3408111 https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826408252 What is explicitly stated is how Vizzini overthought the predicament. Once he does this, he ends up choosing the wrong glass which leads to his death. The man in black planned on this therefore evading death. It was effective in confusing the audience by presenting every possible scenario.]]> 2020-10-13 19:27:20 UTC https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826408252 3477751 https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826408257 It was explicit that there was poison in the glass, there was a duel of the wits and the confusion of the man holding the princess hostage
what was implicit is that the masked man was even more clever than the other]]> 2020-10-13 19:27:20 UTC https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826408257 336787 https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826408359 What was being explicitly stated was the duel where poison was put in one of the glasses and Vizzini is overthinking the situation.]]> 2020-10-13 19:27:22 UTC https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826408359 https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826409439 1) What was explicitly stated was the duel of wits that the men were having with each other and that there was poison in one of the two glasses. It was effective because the man in black tried to make the bald guy overthink everything and end up making him confused and choosing the wrong glass.]]> 2020-10-13 19:27:43 UTC https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826409439 https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826409525 1) its explicit that vizzinis cup had poison since he fell dead at the end of the scene

]]> 2020-10-13 19:27:45 UTC https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826409525 3369802 https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826413331 what is explicitly stated was that the shorter man completely overthought the process of which the other guy took in dishing out the poison. This is because he rambles on about his choices without actually choosing.]]> 2020-10-13 19:29:02 UTC https://padlet.com/dfallon1_uchs/995hwmpuuawdvdzl/wish/826413331