the improproate expections of education press educators and lead to disabled children's sence of segregated.(Heissenbuttel 2014)

it spent decades to establish the bills to give some disabled children the same learning environment as the others. However, unequai treatments are stillcommen, which cause the not low posibility of crimination.(Heissenbuttel 2014)

culture, curriculum and cullaboration mater to neurodiversity which can achieve inclusion without extra costs.(Heissenbuttel 2014)

Disabled created values for humanity.

different national conditions contribute to the different state of affairs between U.S. and Finland.(Shumer 2014)

in culture, U.S. holds much bigger population and more varieties of race while Finland has relativly simpler composition of race and is easier for students to paticipate in classes. In economic, Finland has lower proportion of poor and provide financial support to school from government. However, U.S. grabs much more poverty and private schools.(Shumer 2014)

however, choosing inclusive education hastily can be crucial for children with disabilities in some aspects.(Sharman 2015)

trying to figure out the most propriate educating way is not easy but nessecary. In-time special treatment can be better for disabled children's thrive(Sharman 2015).

Dealing with the disabled student on the edge of the colony is the hardest but matters the most. Teaching level should be paid attention to as chances to get fair educated.( Save the Children 2014)

Heissenbuttel(2014)points out that a lack of sense of belonging relates to academic achievement, health. He adds that there is more isolation and loneliness in educators than ever  before.

As stated by Heissenbuttel(2014),children improved their academic performances through looking at inclusive education. He claimed that the cost of inclusive education is the same as before.

Heissenbuttel(2014) contended that people can show their advantages and be honored in an inclusive community. He notes that people will have high intelligence and emotional  intelligence and family’s cultures are respected and learned in an inclusive community.

However, Shumer(2014) points out that the academic performance of students in the U.S. is influenced by racial diversity,poverty rates ,culture and economic differences and the number of private school.

She points out that some worried parents cannot decide whether to send their child to mainstream school or a special school.

Further more, she states that children may not get help from the parents’ insistent requirement on putting them into mainstream inclusion.

As noted by Sharman(2015),it seems that there is a worrying trend that ideology consideration is prior to the rights of children.

Save the children(2014) acknowledges that,by promoting an inclusive culture in the education background,leads to the mitigation of discrimination attitudes and behaviors and the formation of cohesive and peaceful society.

Otherwise, Save the children(2014) states that inclusive education costs effectively and has a better influence on academic and society.

The organization suggests that not only the minority students,but also all children will benefit from the inclusive method,getting a equal opportunity to receive education.

Moreover, the school classification in the United States is also more complex than in Finland, which makes it difficult for Finland's education strategy to be implemented smoothly in the United States.(Shumer 2014)

Besides, student groups may have negative emotions towards disabled children in inclusive education.(Sharman 2015)

Inclusive education can be academically and socially positive and can promote equity in education for all children.(Save the children 2014)

Finnish children are immediately able to engage in the education process because they are familiar with other students in class.

③Education can move more quickly because there are fewer diverse needs

④The U.S. school system cannot hope to replicate such homogeneity.

⑤U.S. scores were the best in the world.

The achievement gap in the U.S. had gotten larger between income groups.

The U.S. educational system is actually doing well.

②On-site inclusion of children with certain types of disability may increase negative attitudes in the general student body. There is not a universally clear path to best practice.

There appears to be a worrying tendency to consistently perference ideology over the best interests of the child.

@The promotion of an inclusive culture within the education setting

contribute to the eradication of discriminatory attitudes and behaviors, further strengthening social cohesion and peace.

③while the mosteffective inclusive education systems and pngrams do require additional resources, this support is cost-effective and might be less then expected

④An inclusive approach pnomotes an equitable access to education

oppotunities and strengthens the quality of teaching which benefits all children.

Targeting children who are most vulnerable and at risk of exclusion, making sure they are in schal and effectively learning , is the on! to reach Education for all goals and ensure that every child his / her right to education.

Heissenbuttlel(2014) outlines that the academic achievements are associated with the lack

of sense of belonging. The segregated may lead to isolation, loneliness, and low social stature , for disabled students, they might go astray. Moreover , educators feel more isolated than ever .

According to Heissenbuttel (2014), the cost of inclusive education and traditional segregated education are identical .

Heissenttel(2014) believes that inclusive education enhancing connectedness and belongingness , cultivating students with higher emotional intelligence and intelligence , increasing the academic outcomes .

However , shumer(2014) cites that Finland’s familiarity in population ,ethnicity ,language ensures educating process move fluently . He states that at the cultural and economic level ,U.S. schools are influenced by poverty , racial diversity and linguistic barriers , which makes it hard to imitate Finnish patterns .

According to shumer (2014), compared U.S. with other countries with similar population size , racial diversity and poverty rates , U.S. educational systems is doing well.

Sharman (2014) points out that some parents worry about whether choosing special schools as mainstream inclusive schools sometimes cannot help students to learn certain skills . He  cites that inclusion does not suit every children .

Sharman(2014) emphasizes that there is no generally clear way to best practice for implementing inclusion in reality. Another angst trend is that ideology is prior to the best interests of the children.

According to Save the children(2014), promoting an inclusive culture in the educational environment helps to combat discrimination and create a friendly ,cohesive and peaceful society.

Save the children (2014) demonstrates that inclusive education costs effectively and benefits both academic and society .

Studies show that inclusion is “more cost effective,and academically and socially effective,than segregated schooling.”

Firstly,the number of student's academic fruits would rise by implementing Inclusive education.Second,students with different genius in one classroom could assist each other. And Inclusive education can enhance class solidarity by eliminate barriers between students.Then educators can devise more reasonable courses to fit all students.Last,Inclusive education can distribute same resource to regular classes to students fairly.

American has a complicate population construction with larger quantity, more races and nationalities.And minority members are becoming majority members in some states.Also American schools has a higher poverty rate than Finland,so get a low score in international test,Last,the gap between American end point class expand constantly.

Inclusive classrooms promote educational equality, ensuring these students have an equal chance to get an education and succeed (Heissenbuttel, 2014).

Heissenbuttel (2014) states that inclusive education leads to improved academic outcomes for all students. By catering to diverse learning needs and promoting collaboration, inclusive classrooms create a conducive learning environment that enhances academic performance (Imagine, 2024).

Many schools lack the necessary and specialized resources and support to effectively implement inclusive education so that educators may struggle to address the unique needs of students with disabilities or differences, compromising the quality of education (Heissenbuttel, 2014).

Secondly, Finnish population facilitates a cohesive learning environment, where students can easily engage with one another and benefit from collaborative learning experiences (Shumer, 2014).

However, according to Shumer (2014), Finland and the U.S. differ significantly in terms of population size, diversity, and language barriers, making it challenging to copy Finland's education model in the U.S.

Collaborative teaming

The same cost

There is room for everyone to show their strengths.

Learn social-emotional skills, create ways where family's cultures are honored and all families learn together in community.

drawbacks:

Children at the stage of learning to separate from their parents and be in a setting that promotes socialization often feel insecure.

Educators are more isolated and lonely than ever before.

Children labeled with special education are in segregated settings.

Fewer diverse needs makes education can move more quickly.

When poverty is not a factor, U.S. schools and educational training programs are the best.

U.S. charter and private schools also make comparisons between the U.S. and Finland more complicated.

Inclusive classrooms contribute to academic achievement, providing access to a diverse range of learning experiences and resources, catering to the individual needs of all students and potentially enhancing academic outcomes (Sharman, 2015).

According to Sharman (2015), inclusive education aligns with the principle of equal access to education for all students, regardless of their abilities or disabilities, promoting a more equitable society.

However, the implement of inclusive education may strain the capacity of schools and educational systems, because it requires adequate resources, including trained personnel and specialized support services.

(2)inclusion is not always the best choice for every child, sometimes  it’s based more on appeasing the anxieties of their parents, as well as the ideology of the education system.

(3)on-site inclusion of children with certain types of disability may increase negative attitudes in the general student body.

(4)no difference in mainstreamed students' social competence and self-concept.

According to Heissenbuttel（2014），the lack of inclusive education leads to a lack of belonging, which affects the intellectual achievement of students and their ability of participating in the classroom, leaving extreme pressure to the educators

Comparing with their peers, the possibility of suspension for disabled children are as likely as twice, ends up having higher rate of getting into prison.（Heissenbuttel, 2014）

Heissenbuttel（2014）claims that by implementing inclusive education,the academic achievements for all the children are improved, while the environment is enhanced by having all people of all abilities within that classroom.

 Shumer(2014) underscores that compared to the US, there are almost no differences in race, ethnicity, or language among children in Finnish classrooms. Therefore, they are likely to be able to immediately participate in the educational process, which ensures good group cooperation and clear understanding among students.

 As Shumer(2014) mentions, when poverty is not taken into account, the US has a high education level.

  For children with disabilities, what they need more may be interpersonal skills acquired in crowds and queues, rather than excessive academic knowledge (Sharman, 2015)

  Sharman(2015) stresses that it may not increase the positive attitude of the general student population by conducting direct contact with certain types of disabled children in the classroom.

  Studies found no difference between mainstream and special education in students’ social capability as well as a lower self-awareness. (Sharman,2015)  

  The author(2014) states that the reasons for educational exclusion are diverse, including a lack of cultural confidence among disabled children, a lack of effective support from educators, and inadequate infrastructure.

  According to the author(2014), forming an inclusive culture in education is conducive to eliminating discrimination, promoting social peace, and enhancing cohesive force.

  Inclusive education ensures the equal right of different children to be educated, which is more conducive to their comprehensive development, and the cost of education may not be as high as imagined.(The author, 2014)

Poor teacher sources and poor family of some children make inclusive school demanding to take every student into consideration.(Shumer 2014)

Sharman(2015) also points out that mayjority of children in inclusive schools couldn't be teached their interest,as a reslut they might not receive anything useful to them.

disadvantages for inclusive education:It induces the lack of belonging that makes other children feel lonely and isolated.And in some cases children with disabilities have been separated throughout history .

Spend too much time teaching one special student may consume the normal process of teaching plans.(Sharman,2015)

Different groups have accordingly cost level which may lead to unstable education situations.(Sharman,2015)

Help reduce the discriminatory attitudes and strengthen social unity.(Save the children,2014)

Safeguard the students' right to receive education.(Save the children,2014)

The efficiency may be effected by different languages and racia.(Shumer,2014)

2.private schools are monopolized .parents of the students in private schools also attend private schools

3.private schools should be more inclusive .students in six grades of the private schools and states schools have similar grade

2.Private educated students are more advanced in subjects that a good university required

3.Private school has more sources than state school at every stage

4.Less courses are taken in private school

The study found no significant variation between private and state school sixth-formers in the total number of A levels taken.

The large difference in resources between private and state schools leading to the inequality in university access.

Inclusive education provides a better quality education,respect and understanding,context for first relationship for all kids.

Against the opposite idea

Separate special education provides no guarantee of success for particular children.

The imbalance of parts of rich resources

is mainly displayed on the academic gap and the subsequent inequality in university access at each stage.

1.every child has the right to be supported.

2.inclusive education values diversityand the unique contributions.Every child feels safe

3.provide a better-quality education

4.it's not a cost-cutting measure.

2.Enable the development of social relationships and interactions:Respect and understanding grow.