<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Case #1 by Michelle Kim</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/mkim1992/APAMSA1</link>
      <description>During a lecture in the immunology block, a faculty member compared NK cells to Border Patrol Agents. In this analogy, NK cells, like border patrol agents, check other cells to see if they have &quot;passports.&quot; The passport-holding cells were considered &quot;not dangerous, easy pass.&quot; Cells without passports were &quot;dangerous&quot; and killed.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-05-22 18:57:52 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2018-05-24 19:30:52 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Discussion Questions</title>
         <author>mkim1992</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mkim1992/APAMSA1/wish/262822983</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1) Do you think this analogy is an appropriate way to present the concept of NK cells? Why or why not?<br><br>2) Some students found the analogy inappropriate and brought their concerns to the administration. Consequently, the lecturer issued an apology. Do you think the administration's response was necessary, appropriate, and/or adequate?<br><br>3) What was your initial response to the statement? Did your response change after the apology was issued?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-05-22 19:20:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mkim1992/APAMSA1/wish/262822983</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mkim1992/APAMSA1/wish/263466057</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1) No, because that introduced a sensitive political topic into a situation that deflects the true meaning of even broaching this topi.<br>2) Yes, it was necessary and appropriate since this is an issue that has large implications for various communities in our nation<br>3)My initial response was surprise that such an analogy would be used to explain a concept. My response didn’t change after the apology.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-05-24 19:19:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mkim1992/APAMSA1/wish/263466057</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mkim1992/APAMSA1/wish/263466097</link>
         <description><![CDATA[1. No, especially not in our current political climate. 2. I appreciated his apology. He explained and was very sincere. 3. I appreciated his response. ]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-05-24 19:19:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mkim1992/APAMSA1/wish/263466097</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>I did think his apology was very sincere BUT if you ever have to preface something by &quot;this problematic&quot; you just shouldn&#39;t say it </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mkim1992/APAMSA1/wish/263466303</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>there are so many other analogies that could have been used&nbsp;<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-05-24 19:20:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mkim1992/APAMSA1/wish/263466303</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mkim1992/APAMSA1/wish/263466525</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Really appreciated his apology - what else do we expect from faculty/staff/eachother besides an apology/learning and moving on? He was quick to act, didn’t make a joke of it, seemed to understand the issue - how could it have been better?<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-05-24 19:21:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mkim1992/APAMSA1/wish/263466525</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Prefacing the comment with “I know this isn’t going to be politically correct,” points to the idea that Dr. Bui knew beforehand that the explanation was controversial. Initial response was “here we go again.” </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mkim1992/APAMSA1/wish/263466663</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-05-24 19:22:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mkim1992/APAMSA1/wish/263466663</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mkim1992/APAMSA1/wish/263466759</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I feel like there could have been another analogy that could have shown the same concept&nbsp;<br><br><br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-05-24 19:22:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mkim1992/APAMSA1/wish/263466759</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>mkim1992</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mkim1992/APAMSA1/wish/263466939</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I don’t think there was any malintent&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-05-24 19:23:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mkim1992/APAMSA1/wish/263466939</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>mkim1992</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mkim1992/APAMSA1/wish/263467023</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>i thought his apology was insufficient and cast blame on students for being "sensitive", instead of apologizing for making a judgmental and racist statement. This apology very much seemed like the professor was saying "sorry you're sensitive", not "sorry I made an ignorant, racist statement"<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-05-24 19:23:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mkim1992/APAMSA1/wish/263467023</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>mkim1992</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mkim1992/APAMSA1/wish/263467059</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1) Not appropriate to use other people's livelihoods and a horrible political situation that affects people's lives as an analogy. 2) I thought the apology was direct and genuine and didn't shift responsibility onto the audience for "misinterpreting." He seemed to be accountable.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-05-24 19:23:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mkim1992/APAMSA1/wish/263467059</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mkim1992/APAMSA1/wish/263467282</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>It made me think of my undocumented family&nbsp;<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-05-24 19:24:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mkim1992/APAMSA1/wish/263467282</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>This whole year has been problematic </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mkim1992/APAMSA1/wish/263467549</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Smh</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-05-24 19:25:54 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mkim1992/APAMSA1/wish/263467549</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
