https://padlet.com/eandaniel/8xdos1oefusl Made with eyes on the prize en-us 2019-02-17 19:00:19 UTC 2025-10-30 15:06:59 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/icons/Babyhead.png eandaniel https://padlet.com/eandaniel/8xdos1oefusl/wish/332150418 I chose this article, because it is something that many people are affected by, which provides a lot of different facts, opinions, and perspectives on how much it may affect someone on a day-to-day basis. The fact that people with food allergies don't all react in the same way as others with the same food allergy is interesting in my eyes.]]> 2019-02-17 19:07:57 UTC https://padlet.com/eandaniel/8xdos1oefusl/wish/332150418 eandaniel https://padlet.com/eandaniel/8xdos1oefusl/wish/332151981 2019-02-17 19:20:46 UTC https://padlet.com/eandaniel/8xdos1oefusl/wish/332151981 eandaniel https://padlet.com/eandaniel/8xdos1oefusl/wish/332152219 Article Link]]> 2019-02-17 19:22:48 UTC https://padlet.com/eandaniel/8xdos1oefusl/wish/332152219 eandaniel https://padlet.com/eandaniel/8xdos1oefusl/wish/332152883 When evaluating this specific article on wikipedia, it has many components of a quality article. The leading section or introduction is very understandable. It uses diction that is fairly easy to keep up with and even if they used words that aren't as familiar to us, they provide a definition or explanation of that specific word or phrase. It also is balanced very well. There isn't one section of the article that overtakes all of the others. It provides plenty of information on the major aspects of food allergies (signs, symptoms, diagnosis, cause, treatment, along with further research that may be beneficial)]]> 2019-02-17 19:27:59 UTC https://padlet.com/eandaniel/8xdos1oefusl/wish/332152883 eandaniel https://padlet.com/eandaniel/8xdos1oefusl/wish/332154799 When taking a look into conversations about the food allergy article between the wiki editors, they did not seem to have many issues with the content of their fellow editors, but it was more about expanding on specific ideas mentioned throughout the article. They would typically give suggestions in order to present their new views or perspectives on certain information that is given]]> 2019-02-17 19:41:05 UTC https://padlet.com/eandaniel/8xdos1oefusl/wish/332154799 eandaniel https://padlet.com/eandaniel/8xdos1oefusl/wish/332155696 There aren't many problems with the quality of this article. There is no warning banner, no improper use of language, and the article consists of many references. This article contains an abundance of facts, with very few value or opinion based statements. The only minor problem that there seems to be is the use of "some" or "many", not addressing a certain group of people (in this situation not specifying whether certain info is about adults or children).]]> 2019-02-17 19:47:00 UTC https://padlet.com/eandaniel/8xdos1oefusl/wish/332155696 eandaniel https://padlet.com/eandaniel/8xdos1oefusl/wish/332157070 I learned that there are ways to evaluate the credibility of an article on wikipedia quickly, without having to make assumptions that it isn't credible just because we are told not to use it as a primary source]]> 2019-02-17 19:56:55 UTC https://padlet.com/eandaniel/8xdos1oefusl/wish/332157070