<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Genghis Khan and Google -Similarities in Leadership Styles by Mr. Rice</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/apush1718/8x55mpwefsgb</link>
      <description>by Pakhi Gupta</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2017-01-30 14:28:50 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2017-08-03 17:43:46 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Genghis Khan and Google...</title>
         <author>apush1718</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/apush1718/8x55mpwefsgb/wish/150236310</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Pakhi Gupta</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qdtz9H4OM3U" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-30 14:32:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/apush1718/8x55mpwefsgb/wish/150236310</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Anna G </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/apush1718/8x55mpwefsgb/wish/150427241</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Row 1- I gave her a 2 due to her missing a solid conclusion other than her stating why she chose to compare google and Genghis Khan.<br>Row 2- I scored her a 2 due to her vague conclusion.<br>Row 3- 1 due to the very simple evidence and connections she made. It felt more like a summary.<br>Row 4- 2 due to her stuttering and odd hand gestures. She did not seem prepared tp present.&nbsp;<br>Row 5- 2, because she explained her limitations and connections between a company and empire. <br>Row 6- 1, because she loves to generalize her answers and not give specific evidence. <br>Row 7- 1 because once again she is very general.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-31 02:49:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/apush1718/8x55mpwefsgb/wish/150427241</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/apush1718/8x55mpwefsgb/wish/150436238</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Karoline&nbsp;<br>1: 2, she stated her question, method, and argument; however, her conclusions were missing.&nbsp;<br>2: </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-31 05:45:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/apush1718/8x55mpwefsgb/wish/150436238</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/apush1718/8x55mpwefsgb/wish/150436542</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>2: 2, the students conclusions were missing or not clearly stated. This means her scholarly work was not presented in a logically organized argument.&nbsp;<br>3: </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-31 05:54:20 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/apush1718/8x55mpwefsgb/wish/150436542</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/apush1718/8x55mpwefsgb/wish/150436644</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>3: 1, there was little to no connection between the students hypothesis and conclusion.&nbsp;<br>4: 4, the student lacked eye contact (read the presentation from the board), but it did not detract from her argument.&nbsp;<br>5: <br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-31 05:56:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/apush1718/8x55mpwefsgb/wish/150436644</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/apush1718/8x55mpwefsgb/wish/150436767</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>5: 2, the student was able to rationale explain her choice.&nbsp;<br>6: 1, specific details in her answers were lacking. (She tends to generalize her statements which can be seen in her presentation as well.&nbsp;<br>7: 1, the student answered the question </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-31 05:59:46 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/apush1718/8x55mpwefsgb/wish/150436767</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/apush1718/8x55mpwefsgb/wish/150436883</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>however she did not relate it back to her understanding or personal learning. (The question was answered as simple as possible)</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-31 06:02:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/apush1718/8x55mpwefsgb/wish/150436883</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Baxter O&#39;Brien Rubric row 1- 2 the researcher addresses every point on the rubric except the argument is not exactly clear or explicitly stated rubric row 2- 3 the researchers conclusion is not oversimplified but yet not complex enough to be given a 4 while the conclusion is considered weak, the evidence brought in is strong enough to prevent a score of a 2 rubric row 3- 1 the connections and assumptions were to oversimplified and quite general to say the least. the in depth analysis is not their and it does not necessarily support or refute the initial question as a lot of broad general terms are incorporated throughout the presentation rubric row 4- 3 the researcher did a good job of including hand gestures and vocal emphasis throughout the presentation. However, the majority of the presentation was read directly from the board signaling unpreparedness and takes away slightly from the presentation rubric row 5- 2 she does explain the reason why she chose her topic and discussed the overall inquiry process rubric row 6- 1.5 this does not bring much new insight on the topic. it just simply restates facts that have already been conducted and weaves very little of her own voice into it. rubric row 7- 1 she explicitly states the personal conncections but provides very little details in the slides</title>
         <author>apush1718</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/apush1718/8x55mpwefsgb/wish/150503187</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-31 13:07:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/apush1718/8x55mpwefsgb/wish/150503187</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
