No:30

Kls:XII.G

Kosakata:

- Education - Pendidikan

- Curriculum - Kurikulum

- Teacher - Guru

- Student - Siswa

- School - Sekolah

Kalimat: The teacher at the school is developing a new curriculum to enhance the education of every student

.

Terjemahan: Guru di sekolah tersebut sedang mengembangkan kurikulum baru untuk meningkatkan pendidikan setiap siswa.

No:30

Kelas:XII.G

1. Purpose / Social function:

To present two different points of view about the use of AI in education.

2. Generic structure:

• Issue: AI is a trending topic that influences education.

• Arguments for: AI personalizes learning, makes lessons fun, available anytime, builds problem-solving.

• Arguments against: Students depend too much, data privacy issues, high cost, teachers cannot be replaced.

• Recommendation/Conclusion: AI should be applied wisely to support teachers and help students.

3. Why shouldn’t AI replace teachers?

Because teachers give emotional support and adjust learning in ways AI cannot.

4. The Importance of Teachers in the AI ​​Era

Teachers remain crucial because they provide emotional support, guide character, and adapt learning to students' needs. AI is merely a tool, while teachers shape relationships, values, and meaning in the learning process.

Integrity= Integritas

Empathy=Empati

Commitment=Komitmen

Creativity=kreativitas

Ability= kemampuan

Kalimat:

The combination of integrity, empathy, commitment, creativity, and ability forms a strong leader.

Terjemahan: Kombinasi integritas, empati, komitmen, kreativitas, dan kemampuannya membentuk kepemimpinan yang kuat.

No:30

Kls:XII.G

Answer video 1:

Yes, the video is considered a discussion text.

The video presents a main issue or topic, then provides two points of view: arguments for and against. Finally, the video provides a conclusion or recommendation. This structure aligns with the characteristics of a discussion text, namely:

Issue

Arguments for and against

Conclusion or Recommendation.

Answer video 2:

Issue:

In my opinion, the issue is whether the Green Revolution truly brings long-term benefits or creates new problems.

Pro argument:

I believe the Green Revolution helps increase crop yields and makes the country more self-sufficient in food.

Contra argument:

However, I also see negative impacts, such as the destruction of soil fertility and dependence on chemical fertilizers, which actually make things difficult for small farmers.

Conclusion/Recommendation:

In my opinion, the Green Revolution should be directed towards sustainable, environmentally friendly, and equitable agriculture for all farmers.