<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>relational vs. instrumental understanding by Rushma Shah</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/rushma_shah/8tjat4gnuz8m</link>
      <description>Made with a bold sensibility</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2016-08-29 14:35:55 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2017-05-17 07:55:09 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>This article reminds me of math is a kind of game that can be played with the full of fun with the different meanings and understandings.&amp;nbsp; Adding 1 into 1 can be understood and defined based on your understanding of math.&amp;nbsp; Example, Adding 1 glass and another 1 glass together into one bucket makes only 1 bucket of water but if you put one pencil in the box and later add another 1 pencil in the box makes 2 pencils in the box.&amp;nbsp; The answers depends on how the students are taught differently.&amp;nbsp; By providing a practical knowledge, it makes easy for students to understand math problems.&amp;nbsp; Verbalized math can be harder for the beginners.&amp;nbsp; In the example above, 1+1 is always not 2.&amp;nbsp; it can 1 too.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Instrumental understating for quick answers vs. Relational understanding is more to explore ideas.&amp;nbsp; </title>
         <author>rushma_shah</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rushma_shah/8tjat4gnuz8m/wish/120328073</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-08-29 15:12:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rushma_shah/8tjat4gnuz8m/wish/120328073</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
