<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Freedom of Religion Cases by LATRELL PARKER</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/316817/8p4drb78d2ax</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2017-02-10 12:44:51 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2017-02-16 13:38:44 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1925)</title>
         <author>316817</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/316817/8p4drb78d2ax/wish/153036837</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li><strong>Issue:</strong></li><li><strong>Decision:</strong></li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-10 13:08:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/316817/8p4drb78d2ax/wish/153036837</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Everson v. Board of Education (1947)</title>
         <author>316817</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/316817/8p4drb78d2ax/wish/153036871</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li><strong>Issue:</strong> NJ reimbursing parents of parochial &amp; private school students for the costs of busing their children.</li><li><strong>Decision:</strong> Applied the <em>Establishment Clause</em> to the actions of state government; upheld because assistance went to child, not the Church</li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-10 13:08:57 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/316817/8p4drb78d2ax/wish/153036871</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>McCollum v. Board of Education (1948)</title>
         <author>316817</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/316817/8p4drb78d2ax/wish/153036948</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li><strong>Issue:</strong></li><li><strong>Decision:</strong></li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-10 13:09:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/316817/8p4drb78d2ax/wish/153036948</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Engel v. Vitale (1962)</title>
         <author>316817</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/316817/8p4drb78d2ax/wish/153036971</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li><strong>Issue:&nbsp;</strong>NY law required a state-composed prayer to begin the school days.</li><li><strong>Decision:&nbsp;</strong>Declared unconstitutional; violate of the Establishment Clause</li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-10 13:09:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/316817/8p4drb78d2ax/wish/153036971</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Good News Club v. Milford Central School (2001)</title>
         <author>316817</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/316817/8p4drb78d2ax/wish/153037019</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li><strong>Issue:&nbsp;</strong>Schools wouldn't allow religious clubs to meet on school grounds after school; violates Establishment Clause</li><li><strong>Decision:&nbsp;</strong>Court decided allowing them to meet did not violate the Establishment Clause</li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-10 13:09:47 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/316817/8p4drb78d2ax/wish/153037019</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Epperson v. Arkansas (1968)</title>
         <author>316817</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/316817/8p4drb78d2ax/wish/153037074</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li><strong>Issue:&nbsp;</strong>Arkansas law prohibits teaching of Evolution</li><li><strong>Decision:&nbsp;</strong>Ruled unconstitutional; b/c based on "fundamentalist sectarian conviction" &amp; violated the Establishment Clause</li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-10 13:10:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/316817/8p4drb78d2ax/wish/153037074</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971)</title>
         <author>316817</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/316817/8p4drb78d2ax/wish/153037145</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li><strong>Issue: </strong>Pennsylvania law reimbursing religious schools for textbooks &amp; teacher salaries</li><li><strong>Decision:&nbsp;</strong>doesn't violate Constitution if:<ol><li><strong>primary secular purpose</strong></li><li><strong>secular principle effect</strong></li><li><strong>gov &amp; religion are not entangled</strong></li></ol></li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-10 13:10:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/316817/8p4drb78d2ax/wish/153037145</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Lynch v. Donnelly(1984)</title>
         <author>316817</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/316817/8p4drb78d2ax/wish/153037201</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li><strong>Issue:&nbsp;</strong>City annually erects display in public park owned by a non-profit organization; respondents claims that it violates the Establishment Clause</li><li><strong>Decision:&nbsp;</strong>The Court decided the banner was based on Christmas, and not the religion. Therefore, it didn't violate the Establishment Clause</li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-10 13:10:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/316817/8p4drb78d2ax/wish/153037201</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Marsh v. Chambers (1983)</title>
         <author>316817</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/316817/8p4drb78d2ax/wish/153037245</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li><strong>Issue:&nbsp;</strong>Respondent member of the Nebraska Legislature brought an action in Federal District Court, claiming that the legislature's chaplaincy practice violates the Establishment Clause</li><li><strong>Decision:&nbsp;</strong>The Court decided the practice did not violate the Establishment Clause</li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-10 13:10:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/316817/8p4drb78d2ax/wish/153037245</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Van Orden v. Perry and McCreary County v. ACLU (2005)</title>
         <author>316817</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/316817/8p4drb78d2ax/wish/153037315</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li><strong>Issue:&nbsp;</strong>Respondents state that Ten Commandments monument violates the Establishment Clause</li><li><strong>Decision:&nbsp;</strong>The judgement was affirmed</li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-10 13:11:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/316817/8p4drb78d2ax/wish/153037315</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Reynolds v. United States (1879)</title>
         <author>316817</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/316817/8p4drb78d2ax/wish/153037408</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li><strong>Issue:</strong></li><li><strong>Decision:</strong></li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-10 13:11:54 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/316817/8p4drb78d2ax/wish/153037408</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940)</title>
         <author>316817</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/316817/8p4drb78d2ax/wish/153037439</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li><strong>Issue:&nbsp;</strong>States couldn't require special permits for religious solicitation when they weren't required for non-religious solicitation</li><li><strong>Decision:&nbsp;</strong>The Court began applying the Free Exercise Clause to the states &amp; recognized an absolute freedom of belief</li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-10 13:12:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/316817/8p4drb78d2ax/wish/153037439</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)</title>
         <author>316817</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/316817/8p4drb78d2ax/wish/153037521</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li><strong>Issue: </strong>State law requiring school attendance for all 14 to 16 yr/old's</li><li><strong>Decision: </strong>Court ruled the Amish adolescents would be exempt because it goes against their religion.</li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-10 13:12:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/316817/8p4drb78d2ax/wish/153037521</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah (1993)</title>
         <author>316817</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/316817/8p4drb78d2ax/wish/153037913</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li><strong>Issue:&nbsp;</strong>4 FL cities pass laws to ban animal sacrifice; targeted at Santeria religion, which employs animal sacrifice in prayer</li><li><strong>Decision:&nbsp;</strong>Court decided the laws were unconstitutional</li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-10 13:14:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/316817/8p4drb78d2ax/wish/153037913</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Minersville School District v. Gobitis (1940)</title>
         <author>316817</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/316817/8p4drb78d2ax/wish/153039564</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li><strong>Issue:&nbsp;</strong>Pennsylvania law required students to salute the flag; it would go against his religion, free exercise clause</li><li><strong>Decision:&nbsp;</strong>Court ruled against him but it was reversed three years later in a similar case</li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-10 13:21:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/316817/8p4drb78d2ax/wish/153039564</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
