<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Remake of Honours Presentation Skills by </title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/laurenmcinally/8k9x02hd4qr5yoa</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2021-11-30 14:15:54 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-12-03 13:18:51 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/laurenmcinally/8k9x02hd4qr5yoa/wish/3708560295</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Slides are a bit dull, just lots of bullet points and a bit wordy however good information. One of the diagrams is not presented very well. Score 62</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-12-03 13:04:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/laurenmcinally/8k9x02hd4qr5yoa/wish/3708560295</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/laurenmcinally/8k9x02hd4qr5yoa/wish/3708560800</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>When introducing each chapter, there’s too much information. I think each bullet point should be spread across other slides for example when showing the graphs, have a title at the top with a simple sentence introducing why your doing this graph. </p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-12-03 13:05:15 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/laurenmcinally/8k9x02hd4qr5yoa/wish/3708560800</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Presentation marking </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/laurenmcinally/8k9x02hd4qr5yoa/wish/3708561340</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Pros: The presentation is well organised and concise. There’s not too much information in each slide. </p><p><br/></p><p>Cons: Slides are bland and look too much like the previous one. Graphs are missing titles. </p><p><br/></p><p>Grade: 60 </p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-12-03 13:05:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/laurenmcinally/8k9x02hd4qr5yoa/wish/3708561340</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Should eurozone fear deflation </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/laurenmcinally/8k9x02hd4qr5yoa/wish/3708561383</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Graphs and results not thoroughly explained they are just presented unless this is explained in the speech of presentation then they aren’t presented well. I have a question about this- if they present and explain as part of their speech do they get docked marks for not having it explained on the slides ?? So far this is not explanatory it’s very descriptive with not much detail- would give this a low 2:1 maybe a 62??</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-12-03 13:05:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/laurenmcinally/8k9x02hd4qr5yoa/wish/3708561383</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Mid 2/2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/laurenmcinally/8k9x02hd4qr5yoa/wish/3708562609</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Visually unappealing </p><p>Only 4 sources </p><p>Lack of detail </p><p>No definitions </p><p>No equations </p><p> </p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-12-03 13:07:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/laurenmcinally/8k9x02hd4qr5yoa/wish/3708562609</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>58</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/laurenmcinally/8k9x02hd4qr5yoa/wish/3708564946</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Graphs aren’t clear and difficult to understand what they are trying to show.</p><p><br/></p><p>No motivation on the topic.</p><p><br/></p><p>No future plans.</p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-12-03 13:09:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/laurenmcinally/8k9x02hd4qr5yoa/wish/3708564946</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Dissertation </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/laurenmcinally/8k9x02hd4qr5yoa/wish/3708565619</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Messy, inconsistent formatting (e.g. the changing capitalisation)</p><p>No citation of literature</p><p>1 graph is screenshotted</p><p>Other graphs very unclear</p><p>Too much writing</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-12-03 13:09:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/laurenmcinally/8k9x02hd4qr5yoa/wish/3708565619</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>55</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/laurenmcinally/8k9x02hd4qr5yoa/wish/3708567810</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The presentation could have done with having the text next to the graphs.</p><p><br></p><p>Random full capitalisation throughout. Punctuation is off</p><p><br></p><p>They don’t provide next steps.</p><p><br></p><p>They use bullet points but there is a lot of text on the screen at any time.</p><p><br></p><p>They lay out the objectives and goals, but then switch to the dissertation’s layout instead, and makes no written connection to those aims.</p><p><br></p><p>Graphs are copied and pasted and bad quality (pixelated)</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-12-03 13:11:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/laurenmcinally/8k9x02hd4qr5yoa/wish/3708567810</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
