CREATING A CLAIM TO RESPOND by Ms. Dimple Villanueva

I would love to hear your thoughts here!

msdimple — 2022-03-30 18:26:41 UTC

What's your claim?

“I would rather have a man without wealth than wealth without a man."

mercadokyleesymone — 2022-03-31 03:46:48 UTC

If I had to choose between the two and be more realistic, I would choose having wealth without a man. For me, I'd rather prioritize my life more and have my own reputation and be my own "rich woman". Though it wouldn't be the same as achieving something, going from poor to rich, I'd still want to have wealth without a man. Since I am a woman I can also do things on my own without a man. Not every woman wants a life a with a man.

Claim of Value

javadarrenmarie — 2022-03-31 03:53:38 UTC

This might be too arrogant of me but I would rather have wealth without a man and of course I had my reasons. Firstly I don't think I need a man to satisfy my needs or for me to be happy. I can be as happy even with my wealth, I would rather spoil my loved ones, my family and my treasured friends with my richness. I know they say money cant buy as happiness which is yes, let us talk practical about this, but there are really times where if you have enough wealth there would be no suffering towards you and the people depending on you or having their faiths towards you. I chose this for I think I have enough ability to handle myself with the wealth I have and thankfully I have a circle of people who are giving me much support and I know they will not fail me. If I have the wealth, I can handle it with moderation.

“I would rather have a man without wealth than wealth without a man."- It is better to have a man without wealth because I know that there are a lot of ways that we can do to earn through helping each other. Being poor does not mean that you lack money,you lack love that's why you're suffering being broke. Striving hard with your man to achieve your dreams is the best than enjoying wealth without receiving any love from someone. It is wrong to love money for the reason that you will end up hating all the people around you because you think that there is a competition between everyone. It is more beautiful to choose love to achieve real happiness and to pursue the things that you want with your man than to choose money that make us more greedy and will end up on making a barrier for yourself to avoid people.

pitogogwynethhillary — 2022-03-31 04:01:24 UTC

Claim of Value

dizongelian — 2022-03-31 04:14:57 UTC

"I would rather have a man without wealth than wealth without a man."

Claim:
I would rather have a man without wealth, like how couples vow to be with each other through thick or thin.
Why did I choose it? Because for me, it talks about "Partners forever, a buddy, or an ally." Somebody you never imagine being without, yet you enjoy your alone moments with them, that a promise can be made and granted at times.
And wealth cannot assure that, yes, they bestow our needs and wants but not an intimate relationship.
Wealth cannot make you feel emotions eternally as a man that makes you a roller-coaster emotion and challenge your commitment with each other. Wealth can be earned by two of you, and it even makes you solid and flourish in your relationship. Man doesn't need to be a spouse but a person who is willing to be with you by your side. Whom you can run on in time of need, support and motivate you and criticize your wrongdoings.

In our life contentment is important and wealth can be, but a man can level up more the happiness you can feel that wealth cannot surpass.

“I would rather have a man without wealth than wealth without a man."

layugavecaliyah — 2022-03-31 05:00:05 UTC

I'd rather have a man without wealth for the presence of a person is much more important than the existence of a thing. Money may provide us happiness, but once spent, it vanishes quickly; however, a man will undoubtedly provide you with the happiness you deserve, a happiness that will last a lifetime, and a happiness that you may spend and enjoy for the rest of your life. Money will not always be on your side, but a man will.

"I would rather have a man without wealth than wealth without a man"

tagalogfionamarie — 2022-03-31 06:33:53 UTC

If I had to choose a man without wealth or wealth without a man, I would have to choose wealth without a man. Realistically speaking, we all want the best for ourselves, and that also goes the same for me. I also have a lot of things that I want to do and dreams I want to achieve in this lifetime such as travelling, buying my own house, and to be able to attain college degrees. Just imagine the things you can do with money for someone who's much of a dreamer. Being with a man is not what I aspire to be in life; it was something that was imposed on me at an early age. And I also think that involving myself in a romantic relationship would be such a waste of time, as I am someone who is individualistic in MANY, but not all aspects. I am fully content of what is already available in my circle, so I don't need a man.

"I would rather have a man without wealth than wealth without a man."

billaremikaelamay — 2022-03-31 06:36:03 UTC

For me, I would rather have the latter. My priorities in life are fulfilling my goals and supporting my family. I am not interested in the romance department yet. I still have dreams to complete. Being with someone is not the first thing that comes to my mind when thinking about what I want. I want to be wealthy enough to buy all my and my family's wants and needs. I live for myself and them. I long to see the day when I can spoil and support them with my riches. Burdening myself with the lack of money is something I hope not to encounter. What I want to achieve in life needs money. Choosing money over a man is good for me. Again, I was never that interested in romance in the first place. My happiness is not with someone else. It's with me. I don't need to be with someone to be happy.

getuabanmareian — 2022-03-31 06:37:18 UTC

“I would rather have a man without wealth than wealth without a man."

For me I prefer having a man without wealth because money can be found somewhere and can be earned with hard work. A true woman should truly love the man even if he is not wealthy. He is ready to go on with the challenges in life and I want to be on his side in conquering those hardships that we’re about to face. Relationships are not just about love but the couple should be committed and ready in taking risks. We are poor when it comes to wealth but we are rich when it comes to love.

"I would rather have a man without wealth without a man."

luceromariellajade — 2022-03-31 06:57:28 UTC

If I have to choose between these two choices, I would rather choose to have a man without wealth because life is just like your dreams it needs process for you to accomplish them. Our life is just like our world sometimes we are in the bottom but don't lose hope for we will reach the top in the right time and the right place you just need to trust and have faith to God. And when you will reach the top always be humble and remember where you came from and it's time to share to others your blessings.

“I would rather have a man without wealth than wealth without a man."

jovilleperlyn1 — 2022-03-31 07:30:07 UTC

If I had to choose between the two, I would choose a man without wealth since wealth can only make you happy for a short time before you run out of it and have nothing left, especially if you don't know how to save money and are continually tempted to buy new things. Even if you and your man don't have much money, you are wealthy in love. You may create memories together in simple ways, as well as become wealthy and achieve your goals and dreams. It's always happy to hear that someone got your back and will be there for you not only in good times but also in difficult times. There is a saying that says "Don't marry rich, get rich together".

“I would rather have a man without wealth than wealth without a man."

umpadglaizyllemae — 2022-03-31 09:10:07 UTC

If I had to choose, I would rather have a man without wealth because wealth or money can be seen everywhere while a man isn't. I'm not talking about a man who suddenly appears beside you and when a problem comes he disappears, I'm talking about a man that respects you, accepts you even though you have flaws and a man who is willing to be beside you through ups and downs. Being in a relationship is not all about butterflies in your stomach; you need to face the cruelty of the world, that is why having a man who supports you and will be with you is important. Wealth can be earned through hard work, and if you and your man will persevere, you will have that wealth.

You and your man should be each other's shoulder to lean on, feet that will stand up during hard times, and strength for you to achieve your goals together.

Jenny B. Resojento

2022-03-31 10:24:50 UTC

''I would rather have a man without wealth than wealth without a man''.

^{I would prefer a man without a fortune to a man without wealth.'
I was struggling because if I select wealth, my life is peaceful, and I believe myself to be a wealthy lady, I cannot feel hungry or unable to help others, particularly those in need. But if I choose a poor man, I'm worried that we'll go hungry in the future and that our children won't be able to attend school because we won't be able to give. But this is just my opinion; please don't pass judgment. So, I'd rather have a man without wealth than wealth without a man since no one but your family or loved one will make you happy or support you. I don't need fortune because money will be spent and will eventually go away, but men will never stop. They are the ones who make you happy, just as they are the ones you run to if you have a problem, just since they're the ones who make you a rich woman in this world. Also, if I select money, there is a chance that your relationship with someone may end in divorce and that they will no longer like you since you spend all of your money without considering others. I also recognize that if I chose money before happiness, I would be a sad person since no one will like me. I hope you can understand why I'm doing this.}

morenobethanny — 2022-03-31 10:36:56 UTC

"I would rather have a man without wealth than wealth without a man."

If I had to choose between the two, I would rather have wealth without a man. I believe, I have so much in me that needs to be fulfilled, but having a romantic relationship isn't there yet. I want to make myself and my family happy and be able to provide our needs and wants. This is the time for me where I put myself first for me to be happy. Many would say that money can't buy happiness, but for me, it can. Though, this will be temporary, but the thought and memory that I've spent will be remembered. Also, having wealth is for me, a way to give love to other people. I just remembered a quote that says "We can give without loving but we can't love without giving." Having my family and friends is enough for me. I don't need a man to be happy, because I'm more than enough happy when I am being myself.

“I would rather have a man without wealth than wealth without a man. "

carcuevasprincessjerlaine — 2022-03-31 13:23:29 UTC

If I were to choose between a man without wealth and wealth without a man, I would oppose what Monna Giovanna said. For me, "Having riches is much better than having a man." Practically speaking, we cannot live without money these times. In buying a food, we need money. In using water and electricity, we need money. In education, we need money. Everywhere we go, money is involved, and how could we survive without it? Yes, money may not buy permanent things including love and happiness but at least I have my family and friends who can sustain it. I already have those people who are important to me. Besides, there's no assurance that man can give you the love and happiness that you need. We don't know what fate tells us but maybe, there's a possibility that it might turns out into a failure. Aside from that, I feel like being in a relationship is still not yet my priority. I still want to cherish and enjoy the root of my hardwork and sacrifices and, I still want to focus on myself first. Before I'll proceed to that next step, I firstly need to finish my unfinished businesses. I need to make sure that myself is already settled before anything else. I may sound selfish at this point but I'm also thinking if what will happen to me and to him in the future if I will choose that man and not having a stable finances. I don't know but maybe, both of us will having difficulties in living. That's why, I really told myself to set it aside first and make more wealth as a way of preparation to that path. To make things clear, I'm not saying that I don't need a man forever in my life. It's just that, it is not part of my list as of now.

I know, each one of us has different opinions and preferences, I also have mine as well but I hope you will not judge me because of my choice. Let's us respect one another's views. Lovelots😘

- Jerlaine 💜

“I would rather have a man without wealth than wealth without a man"

tonguiaangelajoy — 2022-03-31 15:49:19 UTC

I'd rather choose a man without wealth because money will be spent but someone who will comfort/support me will always there. I encountered suffering one way another, I can overcome it because of my family's support. If I can have someone who always there, both of us will achieve our goals. Even we're not wealthy atleast we're full of loved and both of us will face the hardships together.

Analie Gaviola

2022-04-01 00:26:06 UTC

I'd rather have a man who isn't wealthy than a wealthy man who is wealthy. A man who is not very wealthy but has a personality that can captivate anyone's heart is preferable to a wealthy man who can only captivate people's hearts through the use of money because he lacks a pleasant personality.

“I would rather have a man without wealth than wealth without a man”

cabalunamarymargarette — 2022-04-01 01:55:59 UTC

Claim of Value

In terms of practicality, it is better to have wealth without a man than a man without wealth. Why? Because I can consider that I can handle things on my own. For this time, I am not romantically interested and I hope that I'll never be. I'm not opposed to loving and having a partner in life, but my heart simply screams no. And given my current situation, the financial problems that we're experiencing is like a big barrier between me and my dreams. I feel like living a wealthy and solo life is much better than roughly striving in life with a man of no riches. This also allows me to live my life to the fullest and meet my needs on my own terms. I always convince myself that the greatness of a woman can be seen if she, herself, realizes that she doesn’t need a man to live comfortably. I just want to feel the happiness of being wealthy, being able to buy things that I want or need, and being able to at least give myself satisfaction. Men are everywhere but wealth depends. Better choose wisely and ponder on decisions realistically.

🫶🏻😎🫶🏻

English

torrefeilrainalorraine — 2022-04-01 06:02:02 UTC

"I would rather have a man without wealth than wealth without a man"

I would rather choose wealth without a man because in the future I have a lot of priorities and I have to choose the life that i want to have, I should prove to myself that i can do that, I can do this because despite of everything that I'll encounter, the work the stress etc. I know that this challenges will lead me to a happy life and I want to make my parents proud of me and support my families financially. I want to live my life without regret and I'd better choose myself and family than a man. My life and my family and being successful is one of my priorities.

"I would rather have a man without wealth than wealth without a man."

tangoanninalyn — 2022-04-01 08:35:33 UTC

Claim of Value

From the picture that was given above, it is already showing my reaction to this quote or line. When pandemic starts, I saw how hard life is and a realization hits me. The realization is "it is better to have wealth than to have a man without a wealth". Why? It is because our world right now is depending on things like if you will just think of it, we need money to buy our needs and wants. We have to be practical to survive because as days pass by, everything becomes expensive from foods to things. However, if God will give me a man, I will receive it of course but I will not agree that He will just give me a man without wealth because what can I do to that man if he cannot feed me. When it comes to things like this, we also have to think for the things that we need to consider and one of it is our needs. So, there's a trending line from TikTok that I can relate to this and this is my version, "WHY WOULD I LOOK FOR A MAN, IF I CAN LIVE AND BE HAPPY BY MYSELF?"

“I would rather have a man without wealth than wealth without a man."

cabardoeloisalulu — 2022-04-01 13:21:16 UTC

Honestly, I would choose a man with wealth because that's what I think we all deserve. But, if I had to pick between a man without wealth and wealth without a man, I would choose wealth without a man. I need wealth more than man. As a person who's unprivileged, wealth is really relevant to me; we pay to live, to go to school, and to have our basic necessities met. I was slapped by the harsh reality at such an early age that money is very important, we cannot live without money. It's as if life is about the money. Money brings happiness to me. I'd rather spend my entire life with my family, spoiling them as well as myself. Besides, I've received so much love from my family and friends that I don't see the need for me to be loved by a man. What else could I ask for? I also believe that a person who begs or badly wants to be loved by someone has never experienced being loved by his or her family or those around him/her. Their family had failed to love them that they desired to be loved by others. They had never known what it was like to be loved, but that is for those who are desperate to be loved by others.

“I would rather have a man without wealth than wealth without a man"

cenizasamanthanatalie — 2022-04-01 14:59:12 UTC

What is a man's worth when turbulence of financial instability covers them all? I totally agree with Cher when she said that a man is not a necessity. As much as I want to be tolerated by a man and be held as twice as much tight than I've ever held myself, there are actually a lot more things that you could do than just be with a poor man. I could be all the people that I ever wanted and have the chance to live their lives. I could be part of a little book club with a library full of elderly ladies who shares interesting stories, or I could own all the books that I've ever wanted and be the person that I wish to be. I want to live and feel all the shades and variations of mental and physical experience possible in this lifetime. With abundant riches, I'd be able to fund a purposeful organization who helps oppressed women or young women who seeks opportunities and change for a more brighter future. I want to help women who grew up thinking that their worth and emotional well-being depends on men. Women who have taken a vow of silence, throat straining by the weight of an unrescuable relationship. Living in constant discomfort just for a man. Enabling problematic behaviors of someone unworthy, leaving scars of destructions on themselves because of their upbringing who taught them that the definition of success is a lifestyle where you are a rope that holds people together, pouring all your strength to raise a child and be with an incoriggible man. Money makes the world go round, and it is not always associated with greed. A man cannot change the world and help poverty, but a rich influential woman can.

"I would rather have a man without wealth than wealth without man".

quijanochloekim — 2022-04-03 08:49:01 UTC

I'd rather choose a man without wealth because I can earn money without a wealthy man and also I rather prioritize myself because I can be a rich woman without a wealthy man.

canamakassandrarhyne — 2022-04-08 10:21:02 UTC

Claim of Value

I would choose wealth without a man. Consider the following scenario: you're madly in love with your lover, yet you're hungry. So, what are your plans? Do you want to beg for food or do you want to stroll into a grocery store and buy food with love? Don't ever assume that love isn't important. But don't think for a second that you can live in this century, let alone this planet, if you're only in love with a man who has no money. Let us also accept that being in a relationship with a man isn't all sunshine and roses and happily ever after. If I earn enough money, I will be able to live comfortably, and I will be able to begin purchasing other items to raise my level of living. Being able to purchase things will make me feel much better about myself. Having wealth also implies being able to meet the demands of your loved ones. Indeed money is what makes the world go round. Even if you don't have a romantic relationship, you most definitely have friends or relatives who genuinely love and care for you.

"I would rather have a man without wealth than wealth without a man"

lumbabsofiaxhyza — 2022-04-08 11:09:56 UTC

The first time I heard this question these thoughts and questions came in "If I would choose a man over wealth what can he do for me? How can I go on and help my family if I have no money? Will he be able to help me put food on our table? Will he be able to help me ensure my family's well-being and will he be able to ensure us a better life in the future? And if he promises me with these things will he be able to make it happen? Will he be able to comfort me and be by my side when things don't turn out well? There are so many possibilities that could happen but one thing is for sure. If I were to choose, I would rather have wealth without a man. To be more practical I think it's much better to have wealth than a man since I will no longer have to worry about certain things, like electricity and water bills, food, and our needs and necessities. It's good to have wealth when you know how to manage it and make use of it for the betterment of everyone. Not only I can secure my family a happy, good and luxurious life but I can also help those people who are in need. I can do much more things even if I'm alone and I can do all sorts of stuff and still enjoy it by myself or with company, plus I also have my family and friends. With that I would rather choose a luxurious life than suffer with a man with unsure promises.

alaanmajazmin — 2022-04-16 05:12:43 UTC

When I read this, the first thing that comes to mind is, "Why do I need a man when I'm good on my own?" They say money can't buy happiness, but for me, it can and always will. Having a healthy fortune is a major success for me because it satisfies my requirements and the needs of my family. Today's generation is desperate for love, but they don't prioritize their future; what matters to them is getting into a relationship at a young age and normalizing it. A man who does not have money cannot feed you with his love; instead, both of you will go hungry. It's funny how this generation is so desperate for a relationship but can't even do a simple assignment. Having wealth without a partner is much better for me because I can do whatever I want with it, and it feels so nice when it's your own fortune that you don't need a man anymore because having it makes me happy.

''I would rather have a man without wealth than wealth without a man."

2022-05-27 07:22:57 UTC

We don't need wealth because money is being spent. I would rather have a man without wealth than wealth without a man because no one will make you happy and no one will support you except your family. I would rather. Being rich is not about how much you have but how much you give.

''I would rather have a man without wealth than wealth without a man''

andamonmariel — 2022-05-29 14:44:43 UTC

practically speaking, I would rather have wealth without a man because a poor man cannot give what you need, love is not the only thing that revolves in our lives, there are many problems that you'll need to face that needs money. As a person who is poor and financially unstable, I cannot afford to experience my hardships right now in the next 10 years. I have many goals in life and dreams that I want to achieve. I am a fangirl and being a fangirl is very expensive. And I know that I can get things done better on my own. I can't see myself relying to a man because I grew up working hard and learning things on my own. Having a man without wealth would stress me out, it will only mess my mental health thinking if we can still eat on the next 3 days or if we can pay our debts tomorrow, experiencing this again in the future scares me, because I know how it feels to have a man without wealth.

"I would rather have a man without wealth than wealth without a man."

batadevebriell — 2022-06-08 02:49:57 UTC

𝘾𝙡𝙖𝙞𝙢 𝙤𝙛 𝙑𝙖𝙡𝙪𝙚

To begin with, when I was younger, I believed that having a man without wealth was like in those cheesy romance stories where if you have each other's back, no barriers can come in between your love for each other and you can pass the trials together, but I was wrong. I made a mistake by believing a fantasy romance story that was far from my reality. And as I get older and see my surroundings, all I can say is I would rather have wealth without a man. Being in a man's arm is not in my mind nor heart. Especially since I am not interested in any man right now, I hope it will be like this. Being in poverty since childhood is difficult, especially if you have dreams you can't achieve or afford, or if family expectations weigh heavily on your shoulders. They say money can't buy happiness, but for me it is. Just imagine being content in life all by yourself. I can be happy and contented in life if I have the privilege to do so. so that I can spoil myself, my family, and friends. I still want to experience an activity that I haven't done before. My family, friends, and God give me the love and attention that I deserve. So, why would you need a man when you have yourself, God, your family, and your friends?

"I would rather have a man without wealth than wealth without a man"

dapacmichaellagrace — 2022-06-08 02:50:22 UTC

I'd rather have a man without a wealth because for me the presence of a person is so much important than a thing. I know money can provide us happiness, but it won't last, however ,a man will provide me with the happiness that I deserve, and a man that is always by my side.

“I would rather have a man without wealth than wealth without a man."

2022-06-10 13:53:30 UTC

Between the two I choose wealth without a man, I'm fine being alone and I believe I can live without a man, besides I grow up alone and I'm more interested in not connecting with many people, I love my small circle. Since I was child my dream is to be a rich so I can spoil my family and my friends, just imagine being rich I can pay my all tuitions , buy a house and even buying a lot of groceries. I believe I can still achieve my dreams and be a rich without a man and to prove that being alone is not weak. I rather thinking what should I buy next than worrying about my lover's whereabouts.
(Enot, Kyshia Mae)

abanodharaangel — 2022-06-16 03:49:02 UTC

If I had to choose between the two, I would choose having wealth without a man.

I'd rather prioritize myself for I don't think I don't need a man to satisfy my needs for me. I want everything to come from my own success. I am still young and still capable to experience struggles in life that no man could solve. From the beginning, the only thing I want for me is to strive hard, go for success and earn money to support myself, my family and my future family and spoil them from everything I earned by my own. Money may not buy happiness, yes it is, but practically speaking, we cannot live in this society without the presence of money.

“I would rather have a man without wealth than wealth without a man."

2022-07-01 07:50:35 UTC

_{i would rather choose ".Man without wealth."}

_{If you have to choose between money and love, then many people would suggest that you choose love. The ultimate choice is really up to you. You have to think about what is important to you in life. If making money is truly the thing that you're most passionate about in life, then that's for you to decide. You can earn money but never love. ' It's one of the main reasons why love stands above everything else in the world. It is the only emotion that has the power to be eternal, whereas money is just temporary happiness. You may buy things, travel anywhere, be powerful but you can never buy love. We all know life is getting harder these days and we need stable financial to support our needs but wealth can be earned by working hard for it and can be also earned by having a man by your side because love is where you feel like you have everything having a man who can love you truly is what matters than being wealthy without love. you must go through the life's obstacles for you to be able to live life to the fullest but what makes you survive the obstacles is where you have someone, someone who is 100% sure wants to go with you through tough and hard situations Having a man can even make you feel safer and empower you to do thing you might not feel comfortable doing on your own.

-Duran, Psyche C.}