NW Ordinance - 8th Period by Kellie Fauver

Corey O. 1

2017-12-04 21:21:32 UTC

Natives are expected to be treated faithfully.

Bella 1

2017-12-04 21:21:33 UTC

Natives are expected to be treated fairly, respected, have rights to their land, and be equal

Leena Petry 1

2017-12-04 21:21:39 UTC

They are supposed to be treated with good faith and things aren't supposed to be taken away from them.

Zachary Milonovich 1

2017-12-04 21:21:39 UTC

With respect and kindness

Megan Paquet 1.)

2017-12-04 21:21:42 UTC

Americans can not take native land and have to respect them

Nate 1

2017-12-04 21:21:48 UTC

With equality

Emma 1

2017-12-04 21:21:49 UTC

They were expected to be treated the same as the Americans

Jacob 1

2017-12-04 21:21:52 UTC

The natives were expected to be treated with respect and that they should be treated like everyone else.

Tyson 4

2017-12-04 21:21:54 UTC

To me the most important part of them NW ordinance was that some states didhave slaves

JoJo 1

2017-12-04 21:21:56 UTC

The natives are supposed to be treated with respect and no one can take their land without their consent.

Aubrey Mokry 1

2017-12-04 21:22:08 UTC

Natives are expected to be treated with respect

Alycia 1.

2017-12-04 21:22:08 UTC

WIth respect and kindness

Nate 1

2017-12-04 21:22:28 UTC

As a citizen

Zachary Milonovich 2

2017-12-04 21:22:42 UTC

Leena Petry

2017-12-04 21:22:49 UTC

They can write a state constitution for Congress to approve.

Megan Paquet 2.)

2017-12-04 21:22:52 UTC

No taxes

Bella 2

2017-12-04 21:22:57 UTC

Property

2017-12-04 21:23:00 UTC

Austin 1 they are expected to be treated respectfully

Nate 2

2017-12-04 21:23:10 UTC

Ability to be a represenative

Alex Johnson 1

2017-12-04 21:23:10 UTC

They are supposed to be treated with respect and faith and not have things taken away.

Jacob 2

2017-12-04 21:23:15 UTC

JoJo 2

2017-12-04 21:23:28 UTC

The settlers had to have 5,000 men for a 2part legislature

Megan Paquet 3.)

2017-12-04 21:23:29 UTC

There previous owner can reclame them

Nate 3

2017-12-04 21:23:34 UTC

They would be able to be "reclaim" them

Corey O. 2

2017-12-04 21:23:46 UTC

They can become representatives

Bella 3

2017-12-04 21:24:01 UTC

If a slave ran away they would be taken back to their owner or the state they were from

Nate 4

2017-12-04 21:24:12 UTC

No slavery

Emma 2

2017-12-04 21:24:19 UTC

Right to a jury trial

Megan Paquet 3.)

2017-12-04 21:24:24 UTC

There previous owner can reclaim them

Zachary Milonovich 2

2017-12-04 21:24:40 UTC

No taxes

Leena Petry 3

2017-12-04 21:24:50 UTC

They may be lawfully reclaimed and given to the person claiming their service

JoJo 3

2017-12-04 21:24:52 UTC

The slave will have to reclaim his labor or services

Bella

2017-12-04 21:24:52 UTC

They can’t havw slaves in the new states

Aubrey Mokry 2

2017-12-04 21:24:53 UTC

One right granted to settlers is the right to have a constitution and to have the government protect their property.

Tyson 1

2017-12-04 21:24:57 UTC

The natives were expected to be treated fairly and that they should never be harmed or invaded unless congress declared war on them

Megan Paquet 4.)

2017-12-04 21:24:59 UTC

No slavery

Alex Johnson 2

2017-12-04 21:25:06 UTC

No taxes

Jason Gear 4

2017-12-04 21:25:11 UTC

The most important thing about the NW ordinance is there is no slavery.

ALYCIA 2.

2017-12-04 21:25:12 UTC

NO taxes

Zander Dick 1)

2017-12-04 21:25:14 UTC

kind and respected

JoJo 4

2017-12-04 21:25:21 UTC

No slavery

Emma 2

2017-12-04 21:25:30 UTC

Right to a jury trial

2017-12-04 21:25:30 UTC

Alex Johnson 3

2017-12-04 21:25:42 UTC

The slave owner could reclaim them

Emma

2017-12-04 21:25:45 UTC

They will be captured

Zander Dick 2

2017-12-04 21:25:55 UTC

they would be able reclaim the slaves

Aubrey Mokry 3

2017-12-04 21:25:56 UTC

If a slave ran away on this area th fugitive could be reclaimed and conveyed to the person claiming his or her labor or service

Jacob 2

2017-12-04 21:26:00 UTC

Right to jury trial

Corey O. 3

2017-12-04 21:26:03 UTC

Alex Johnson 4

2017-12-04 21:26:24 UTC

The most important thing is no slavery.

Leena Petry 4

2017-12-04 21:26:31 UTC

The most important part of the NW ordinance to me is that the state can write their own constitution when they hit a certain population. (60,000 men

Austin 2

2017-12-04 21:26:31 UTC

The right to be a representative

Zachary Milonovich 3

2017-12-04 21:26:32 UTC

The slave owner could reclaim them

ALYCIA 3.

2017-12-04 21:26:32 UTC

THE slaves shall have been duly convicted

Emma 4

2017-12-04 21:26:44 UTC

Right to a jury trial

Tyson 2

2017-12-04 21:26:51 UTC

The settlers were able to make there own constitution and become a state as well as elect representatives

Corey O. 3

2017-12-04 21:27:06 UTC

They may be lawfully reclaimed and conveyed to the person claiming his or her labor service

Zachary Milonovich 4

2017-12-04 21:27:22 UTC

No slavery

Jason Gear 1

2017-12-04 21:27:28 UTC

The natives were expected to be treated fairly

Jacob 3

2017-12-04 21:27:29 UTC

The Slave owner can reclaim them

Logan Shanahan 1

2017-12-04 21:27:46 UTC

with respect

Jacob

2017-12-04 21:28:01 UTC

There being no slavery

Aubrey Mokry 4

2017-12-04 21:28:05 UTC

The most important part of the NW ordinance to me is the fact that they cannot have slaves in the territory’s and can be represented in the government

Austin 3

2017-12-04 21:28:11 UTC

They could be reclaimed by their

Corey O. 4

2017-12-04 21:28:13 UTC

Most important part is no slavery

ALycia 4.

2017-12-04 21:28:27 UTC

NO slaves

Zander Dick 3)

2017-12-04 21:28:27 UTC

they can lawfully reclaim the slave that ran away

Taylor 1

2017-12-04 21:28:33 UTC

Their lands and property are never to be taken without their consent, and in their property, rights, and liberty, they shall never be invaded or disturbed, unless in just and lawful wars authorized by Congress

Corbin rut

2017-12-04 21:28:34 UTC

The natives Americans are expected to be treated fairly

Tyson

2017-12-04 21:28:54 UTC

If slaves were to run away to the NW territorys they would be returend to their owners

Julia D 1

2017-12-04 21:29:07 UTC

fairly and respected

Austin 4

2017-12-04 21:29:17 UTC

No slavery

Jason Gear 3

2017-12-04 21:29:20 UTC

The slave would be lawfully claimed in anyone of the original states.

Olivia Lowe

2017-12-04 21:29:40 UTC

Kind and fairly

Logan Shanahan 4

2017-12-04 21:29:52 UTC

No slavery

Julia d 2

2017-12-04 21:30:09 UTC

no slaves

Zander Dick 4)

2017-12-04 21:30:11 UTC

no slaves

Corbin rut

2017-12-04 21:30:34 UTC

They have the right to have representation

Kaelyn

2017-12-04 21:30:51 UTC

1 was he Natives are to be treated respectfully

Julia d 3

2017-12-04 21:30:58 UTC

they would be treated as a equal

Kaelyn

2017-12-04 21:31:40 UTC

2 the settlers have the right to have a representative in parlerment

Jason Gear 2

2017-12-04 21:31:44 UTC

No taxes

Julia d 4

2017-12-04 21:32:08 UTC

no pact and slavery

Taylor 2

2017-12-04 21:32:26 UTC

Elect a representative

Corbin rut

2017-12-04 21:32:36 UTC

The slave owner could reclaim him or her

Kaelyn

2017-12-04 21:33:07 UTC

3 the slave owner would go to jail

Taylor 3

2017-12-04 21:33:16 UTC

The territory they ran to can claim them and use their ser

Kaelyn

2017-12-04 21:34:04 UTC

4 to me the most important law for the NW is no slaves

Taylor 4

2017-12-04 21:34:11 UTC

The freedom to the slaves