<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Emily and Olivia&#39;s Search and Seizure Project   by Emily Vargas</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/emily_vargas1/891zhvjdv6os</link>
      <description>Mapp v. Ohio </description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-12-03 18:23:13 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2024-05-31 03:38:09 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Image 1 </title>
         <author>emily_vargas1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/emily_vargas1/891zhvjdv6os/wish/310570677</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The search of a bombing suspect with out a warrant was the whole reason this persons 4th amendment was violated </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/339272355/7de4dcd3249086569d4fc344d7abca74/Screenshot_2018_12_03_at_12_26_34_PM.png" />
         <pubDate>2018-12-03 18:27:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/emily_vargas1/891zhvjdv6os/wish/310570677</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>What? </title>
         <author>emily_vargas1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/emily_vargas1/891zhvjdv6os/wish/310576672</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>A investigation in repose to a anonymous tip lead to belief of a possible bombing suspect. In 1957 the police in Cleveland entered Dollree Mapp's home and conducted a warrant-less search. No suspect was found during this search. Allegedly books and pictures were found. The case was found to violate amendments and the case was dropped</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/339272355/7feb7d9ed176a5368505d8f610d93055/Screenshot_2018_12_03_at_3_21_55_PM.png" />
         <pubDate>2018-12-03 18:36:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/emily_vargas1/891zhvjdv6os/wish/310576672</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Where?</title>
         <author>emily_vargas1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/emily_vargas1/891zhvjdv6os/wish/310583304</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Cleveland, Ohio </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-12-03 18:47:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/emily_vargas1/891zhvjdv6os/wish/310583304</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>When? </title>
         <author>emily_vargas1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/emily_vargas1/891zhvjdv6os/wish/310583530</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>June 19th, 1961</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-12-03 18:47:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/emily_vargas1/891zhvjdv6os/wish/310583530</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Why? </title>
         <author>emily_vargas1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/emily_vargas1/891zhvjdv6os/wish/310583923</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-12-03 18:48:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/emily_vargas1/891zhvjdv6os/wish/310583923</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Legal Significance of the Case. </title>
         <author>emily_vargas1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/emily_vargas1/891zhvjdv6os/wish/310653981</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Legal or Illegal? <br>This was an illegal search and seizure case. This case violated the 4th amendment right because evidence that was found violated the 4th amendment determined by the Supreme Court. The 4th amendment prohibits "unreasonable searches and seizures which is why the exclusionary rule was used and the evidence that was found was not able to be used which relates to the 14th amendment due process. <br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-12-03 20:59:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/emily_vargas1/891zhvjdv6os/wish/310653981</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Image 2 </title>
         <author>emily_vargas1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/emily_vargas1/891zhvjdv6os/wish/310659627</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The evidence they found was not legal to use in court due to Dollree Mapp's rights specifically in this case the exclusionary rule. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/339272355/4f08ae4a7d89494443a2b5761cf6b13e/Screenshot_2018_12_03_at_3_14_34_PM.png" />
         <pubDate>2018-12-03 21:15:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/emily_vargas1/891zhvjdv6os/wish/310659627</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Source </title>
         <author>emily_vargas1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/emily_vargas1/891zhvjdv6os/wish/310662226</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Duignan, Brian. “Mapp v. Ohio.” <em>Encyclopædia Britannica</em>, Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., 12 June 2018, www.britannica.com/event/Mapp-v-Ohio.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-12-03 21:22:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/emily_vargas1/891zhvjdv6os/wish/310662226</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
