<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Takeaways from Tuning Protocol by JENNIFER Egan</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/eganj2/83qwyd4u7ph2</link>
      <description>As a table group, what are some takeaways from today&#39;s work?</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2019-01-30 17:14:52 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2026-01-16 02:17:31 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Table 2</title>
         <author>spectorsa</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/eganj2/83qwyd4u7ph2/wish/326844645</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>- Nice to see connections between disciplines<br>- Difficult to critique outside of our content areas<br>-It's hard to get good alignment of the SOI and GRASPS. <br>-Hard to ask clarifying questions outside of your content<br>-However, feedback from this group was really different from the feedback we would get from our departments, so this is helpful. <br>- Protocol suggestion: cue cards or examples of questions for the different parts of the protocol, just as a visual reminder. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.nsrfharmony.org/product/collaborative-cue-cards-15-pack/" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-01 19:19:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/eganj2/83qwyd4u7ph2/wish/326844645</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Table 11</title>
         <author>reichenbergery</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/eganj2/83qwyd4u7ph2/wish/326844711</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>- There are commonalities between different disciplines. <br>- Super helpful to see that other departments are finding the same challenges<br>- Example: Challenges with creating and presenting rubrics for summative assessments<br>- Being in these interdisciplinary groups provided different perspectives in implementing GRASPS in a way that students take the project seriously and turn in a high-quality project</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-01 19:19:20 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/eganj2/83qwyd4u7ph2/wish/326844711</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Table 8 </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/eganj2/83qwyd4u7ph2/wish/326845029</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>-Multiple perspectives: good to have input from colleagues in different content areas...nice to see how other departments are handling unit building <br>-Seeking clarification on grading-how to blend current grading system with MYP grading <br>-Brainstorming time to create new approaches to presenting rubrics to students <br>-Struggling with MYP rubrics v. standard rubrics--&gt;how kids will understand <br>-SOI needs to be imbedded throughout unit and daily lessons <br>-Still unsure of when we will have the time to complete units <br>-</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-01 19:20:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/eganj2/83qwyd4u7ph2/wish/326845029</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Table 6</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/eganj2/83qwyd4u7ph2/wish/326845055</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>- It was great to have perspectives from different content areas <br>- Help clarify further questions<br>- Raises new questions that you didn't think about<br>- Allowed us to take a deeper look into the work that we're doing, but also helps us take a step back and look at the bigger picture.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-01 19:20:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/eganj2/83qwyd4u7ph2/wish/326845055</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Table 3</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/eganj2/83qwyd4u7ph2/wish/326845076</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Grade level team discussions to rework unit plans based on feedback and recommendations.<br><br>Use this protocol within our own departments to get feedback on our units.<br><br>Would like to have a content specific point person from which to get  feedback.<br><br>Would like to see an exemplar unit plan from our specific content.<br><br>Helpful to know that all teachers in different subject areas are struggling with this.<br><br>Will we ever receive feedback from district administrators on our work?<br><br>Some subject areas lend themselves more organically to authentic assessments.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-01 19:20:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/eganj2/83qwyd4u7ph2/wish/326845076</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Table 9 </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/eganj2/83qwyd4u7ph2/wish/326845154</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Positive: </strong><br>-Easily differentiated<br>-Was nice to see a whole cohesive unit and a GRASP that was a true practical application and had clear alignment to the SOI <br>-Real life applications is great for engagement <br><strong>Confusions: </strong><br>-Diff disciplines are struggling with making the SOI make sense using the required terms and then making sure it truly ties to, and is assessed by the final unit GRASP <br>-Rubric created a lot of questions in regards to common conversions from a 0-8 scale to our traditional grading scales... Should we as a school have a common conversion that all disciplines utilize <br>-Difficult for certain disciplines to make real life applications that seem natural and result in student by in  </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-01 19:20:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/eganj2/83qwyd4u7ph2/wish/326845154</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Table 5</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/eganj2/83qwyd4u7ph2/wish/326845325</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1.) vast curricular changes (MYP, expansion of IB program); no structural or institutional changes to support or accommodate dynamic curriculum<br>2.) juggling/negotiating New York State standards, MYP requirements, and best practices for a very diverse student body<br>3.) assessment of MYP units: Is the current grading system an authentic way to assess within MYP model? (e.g. normative grading, rubric grading)<br>4.) feeling that students are increasingly forced into an all-IB schedule that doesn't accommodate electives and student interest/specialization: Are we narrowing opportunities for students to excel in a single or specialized area?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-01 19:20:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/eganj2/83qwyd4u7ph2/wish/326845325</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Table 13</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/eganj2/83qwyd4u7ph2/wish/326845361</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>- (special ed) was not involved with MYP this morning, maybe it would have more beneficial to be placed in a group together.<br>- We found a lot of connections between Language Task, could have used it for Mathematics, Science, Business....<br>-Appreciate connectivity between subject areas.<br>- We would love some Cannolis next time!</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-01 19:20:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/eganj2/83qwyd4u7ph2/wish/326845361</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Table 1</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/eganj2/83qwyd4u7ph2/wish/326845382</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>- Pros: <br>* This was helpful collaboration to engage in with our colleagues - feedback given was purposeful<br>*This helped promote ideas for GRASPS<br>* THis helped enhance our understanding of ATLs<br>* Sharing of materials between colleagues was useful <br><br>-Cons:<br>* Still unsure of how to construct the language surrounding unit design --&gt; different trainings and departments have promoted different interpretations - we need commonality and consensus<br>* We have different base knowledge of MYP - not all of us have receved training<br>* Working on common grade levels would be helpful to look at GRASPS and streamline expectations and find meaningful connections<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-01 19:20:54 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/eganj2/83qwyd4u7ph2/wish/326845382</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Table 10</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/eganj2/83qwyd4u7ph2/wish/326845384</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>- it is exciting to see the different authentic assessments across subject areas<br>- conversations sparked ideas across subjects <br>- positive feedback help alleviate stress  </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-01 19:20:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/eganj2/83qwyd4u7ph2/wish/326845384</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Table 12</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/eganj2/83qwyd4u7ph2/wish/326845476</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>-good conversations connecting with other disciplines<br>-there are a lot of connections between disciplines<br>-two strongest and complete units were those that had common planning time as a department<br>-still uncertainty and discomfort using the unit planner<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-01 19:21:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/eganj2/83qwyd4u7ph2/wish/326845476</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Table 4</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/eganj2/83qwyd4u7ph2/wish/326845889</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>-Valuable to hear other people's content for interdisciplinary opportunities.<br>-We appreciated the exchange but it would be more beneficial in the future to have more time to work within out own content area.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-01 19:22:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/eganj2/83qwyd4u7ph2/wish/326845889</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Table 7</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/eganj2/83qwyd4u7ph2/wish/326846332</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>-Valuable input from other content areas to build on our own practice<br>-interesting to see how other departments are being creative and making connections to the real world.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-01 19:23:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/eganj2/83qwyd4u7ph2/wish/326846332</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
