<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>MLS3506 Beyond Stickers and Strikes by Ms Nur</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/Ms_Nur/Stars_Strikes</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2025-04-17 07:43:40 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-04-24 05:15:45 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Case Study: Managing Behaviour Beyond Stickers and Strikes</title>
         <author>Ms_Nur</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/Ms_Nur/Stars_Strikes/wish/3413809767</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>In a Primary 5 class, a teacher introduced a two-pronged behaviour management system: a “Warning Wall” to deter disruptive behaviour and a token economy to reward responsibility. Students who talked out of turn or failed to follow instructions received visible warnings. On the other hand, those who completed tasks or helped peers earned tokens exchangeable for small prizes. Initially, the system yielded quick results—disruptions decreased and students eagerly participated to earn rewards.</p><p>However, over time, patterns emerged. A group of students consistently received warnings, and one became withdrawn and reluctant to participate, fearing public embarrassment. Others began to manipulate the token system—offering help only when it would earn them points. The teacher noticed that cooperative behaviour was fading when tokens weren’t at stake.</p><p>This mirrors the principles of behaviourist theory: rewards (positive reinforcement) and threats (punishment) can shape short-term behaviour. However, the absence of intrinsic motivation led to superficial compliance rather than meaningful engagement. The teacher eventually shifted to class-led reflections and peer recognition to rebuild intrinsic ownership of behaviour.</p><p><br/></p><p><strong>Discussion Prompt: What does this case suggest about the long-term effects of extrinsic motivators? How might teachers shift from control to empowerment in managing behaviour?</strong></p><p><br/></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-04-17 09:37:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/Ms_Nur/Stars_Strikes/wish/3413809767</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>eunice_tang</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/Ms_Nur/Stars_Strikes/wish/3422775859</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li><p>Cannot be solely dependent on one form of motivators</p></li><li><p>The motivators are just used to firefight, to target the surface behaviour, does not address underlying issues (e.g. students might be disengaged in class)</p></li><li><p><strong>Long-term effects of extrinsic motivators:</strong> doesn't address the underlying issues so the students' efforts are not sustainable, they give up</p></li><li><p><strong>How might teachers shift from control to empowerment? </strong></p><ul><li><p>There was no explanation about the behaviours, students are merely focused on the rewards/punishments. So need to explain to the students</p></li><li><p>Need to come up with different motivators for different students because each student is different</p></li></ul></li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-04-24 05:10:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/Ms_Nur/Stars_Strikes/wish/3422775859</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
