<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>6.5  Activity: Evaluating board performance by Gia Instructor</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/governanceinstitute/821ebngbmi3sxkn</link>
      <description>Accountability &amp; Compliance</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2025-08-29 02:01:47 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2026-03-31 02:15:42 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Outline a plan for evaluating board performance, addressing leadership challenges, and enhancing team cohesion.</title>
         <author>GiaInstructor</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/governanceinstitute/821ebngbmi3sxkn/wish/3846472386</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>1) Chair to review its position as they set the agenda and facilitate effective decision making.   Inconsistent performance could indicate a lack of understanding of data presented ineffective ways in which data is presented (e.g. committee meetings who interpret / present data differently).  Alternatively, KPIs may not be set effectively to identify or preempt misalignment to strategy.</p><p><br></p><p>2) Inconsistent performance / tensions could be attributed to ineffective or inadequate stakeholder engagement.  For example, if only external stakeholder / shareholder input is being used, this may not consider employee observation or internal assurance opinions.  The vice versa is also a possibility</p><p><br></p><p>3) It appears that this particular board would benefit from an external input / someone independent to the business who can critically evaluate the position of the business without any bias.  This would effectively support circuit breaker introduction and reset. </p><p><br></p><p>4) Change management may also be something that requires attention - whether it be regulatory / compliance or other operational change, without appropriate support / management this could be contributing to some of the identified issues.  It would be strongly recommended to include change management as part of any review / uplift determined through the independent consultation.</p><p><br></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2026-03-31 02:15:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/governanceinstitute/821ebngbmi3sxkn/wish/3846472386</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Board Improvement Plan for Ajax Ltd</title>
         <author>GiaInstructor</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/governanceinstitute/821ebngbmi3sxkn/wish/3846472850</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Strengthen Board Leadership and Culture</p><ul><li><p>Reinforce ethical leadership, proactive behaviours and a culture of accountability, led by the Chair.</p></li><li><p>Promote openness, respect and a commitment to organisational purpose.</p></li></ul><p>Clarify Roles and Responsibilities</p><ul><li><p>Ensure clear distinction between board and management functions.</p></li><li><p>Update charters and decision-making frameworks to remove ambiguity.</p></li></ul><p>Implement Board Performance Evaluation</p><ul><li><p>Introduce annual board, committee, and director evaluations using independent external facilitators.</p></li><li><p>Use outcomes to guide targeted development and organisational planning.</p></li></ul><p>Enhance Stakeholder Engagement</p><ul><li><p>Strengthen communication with key stakeholders; employees, shareholders, regulators and customers.</p></li></ul><p>Develop Capability and Strategic Alignment</p><ul><li><p>Build director capability in governance, risk, and compliance.</p></li><li><p>Ensure board priorities align with corporate strategy and support continuous improvement in governance maturity.</p></li><li><p><br></p></li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2026-03-31 02:15:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/governanceinstitute/821ebngbmi3sxkn/wish/3846472850</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
