https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n Scientific and Technical Innovation en-us 2023-01-17 07:41:38 UTC 2025-01-20 06:05:06 UTC hello@padlet.com workbnchin https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446514010 I believe that the NCBI is more trustworthy than Pfizer because it has 20 sources, while Pfizer doesn't have any. Despite the fact that Pfizer is newer, which would suggest its credibility, the NCBI's article is still quite recent, being from 2015, from which which medical information is not yet outdated.]]> 2023-01-17 08:36:09 UTC https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446514010 ghazymonem https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446514805 I believe that this link is trust worthy than the second one as its up to date as its on 2022 but in the second one it stopped on 2010 on the timeliness ]]> 2023-01-17 08:37:00 UTC https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446514805 arafajana002 https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446515927 I think that the first link is more credible because it was at a time that is relevant to our time, because there are some very well-known doctors, and because there are trustable sources. 

I think that the second isn't credible because there are no trustable sources at all.]]> 2023-01-17 08:38:13 UTC https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446515927 https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446516268 I believe  that this link is credible because, 
it has no advertisement, 20 sources, while the other link has advertisement for this and few sources.]]> 2023-01-17 08:38:34 UTC https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446516268 https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446516590 i believe this is more credible because contains 20 sources while pfizer has only 8 sources and pfizer benefits of many companies while NCBI does not benefit of any companies and does not encourage the websites that pop up next to it ]]> 2023-01-17 08:38:54 UTC https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446516590 https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446516733 I believe this is more credible because it has 20 sources and it is because it doesn't benefit.
While the PFIZER has 8 and it it benefits from lots of companies.]]> 2023-01-17 08:39:03 UTC https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446516733 https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446517010 I believe this link is far more credible as everything is up to date. This website was last updated in 2022

I believe the 2nd link is less credible as it was last updated 2010!!!]]> 2023-01-17 08:39:24 UTC https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446517010 https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446518236 I believe this is credible because it is up to date and has many sources and has many known doctors as authors ]]> 2023-01-17 08:40:44 UTC https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446518236 https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446519698 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4378521/

I believe that this website is more credible than the first one because this link describes the every thing inside it and it also contains scale that describes everything in the link with dates. They also put the author in the first page before the information .]]> 2023-01-17 08:42:16 UTC https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446519698 https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446521016 I believe this is more credible because it is not out dated and there is evidence supporting the information. Pfizer also has 8 to 9 sources.]]> 2023-01-17 08:43:15 UTC https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446521016 danaaali20 https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446521099 I believed this is credible because it is up to date and has many sources and has many known doctors as authors for treatment.]]> 2023-01-17 08:43:20 UTC https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446521099 https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446521187 I believe that the 2nd link is more reliable as it has more evidence/ figures while in the first link has more ads. It also has the name of the author at the top rather than having it at the bottom. ]]> 2023-01-17 08:43:26 UTC https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446521187 https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446521348 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4378521/#

I believe that this website is more credible that the first one because this website contains a lot of sources and no advertisements, while Pfizer has a lot of advertisements and few evidence or sources. Pfizer is newer, being in 2022, but this is more trustworthy because the first website has very few sources, and it benefits from those advertisements, while NCBI has none and only publishes the truth. ]]> 2023-01-17 08:43:37 UTC https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446521348 https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446521371 Eshaan https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4378521/

I believe this is more trustworthy because it gives more info and has more figures while the first one has more ads then the second one. It also has the name of the owner on the top unlink Pfizer having him down.]]> 2023-01-17 08:43:38 UTC https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446521371 amrelakadd https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446521550 2023-01-17 08:43:50 UTC https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446521550 https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446521951 The link is trust worthy as it's very up to date white the second link is very not up to date as the second link was till 2010]]> 2023-01-17 08:44:14 UTC https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446521951 https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446525897 https://www.pfizer.com/news/articles/what_you_need_to_know_about_antibiotic_resistance

I believe that this link is more credible because the author, Charles Pfizer, is a famous trust worthy creator that immigrated from Germany to America, has more experienced Ceos, is more up to date, gives some evidence about their work.

I believe that the second link isn't as credible because the author isn't really known, it isn't up to date, and the timeline about the developed antibiotics reached till 2011, and all their evidence is from links that are all before 2015. ]]> 2023-01-17 08:47:35 UTC https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446525897 https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446526850 I believe this is more credible because: 
- The authors are trusted and have been said to be great people. (based on Forbes.com and zippia.com)
- They are not sponsored by other companies but the work with other site authors.
- Many different links/websites think that pfizer is a great link and has good history.
- It is up to date and has information about the current pandemics such as covid-19. 

I think the other link is not as trusted because:
- I cant find a lot of information about the author 
- They are non-profit 
- The site was last updated and has information from 2015 april.]]> 2023-01-17 08:48:14 UTC https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446526850 https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446526958 I believe that this link is more trustable because first  it was written in covid - 19. And because there are very well known doctors who wrote the site, also it is beneficial.

Well the other site is not trustable because it doesn't say anything about the information, and it is not beneficial. ]]> 2023-01-17 08:48:20 UTC https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446526958 https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446527037 I believe that this link is more trusted because 
- The authors are trusted because I found lots of accurate information about them and their CEO (according to Forbes.com and zippia.com)
- Its information is updated and isn't old. ( Cites are from different website evidence)
- It was also not sponsored by any link or website. 

I think that the other Link (NCBI) isn't trusted because
- It isn't updated, the last time it was updated was in April 2015. 
- I can't find many resources that state that NCBI is trusted. 
- They are non-profit]]> 2023-01-17 08:48:25 UTC https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446527037 https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446532449 it is credible because it has other web sites supporting its information and more evidence than website 4. although this web site is out dates it wins in the other criterias ]]> 2023-01-17 08:53:22 UTC https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446532449 https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446536409 I think this link is credible because there are many points of views, and the authors do not benefit, they have many citations, and it was published in 2021 ]]> 2023-01-17 08:57:19 UTC https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446536409 https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446537763 I believe that the 3rd source is more reliable than the 4th as it has more evidence and when we enter the about pages of the 2 websites we can see that the 3rd source is working for the government while the 4th source has a premium membership. To add, the 3rd source has 10 figures to defend its claim]]> 2023-01-17 08:58:51 UTC https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446537763 https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446537870 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B978012824086100011

The third one has more info while the fourth one is just a couple sentences and has no evidence and no info 
But the third one has more info and you can see the third one is with the government while the fourth one has nothing]]> 2023-01-17 08:58:59 UTC https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446537870 https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446538469 i think that this one is more reliable because the new scientist's author works for the company and they benefit from the advertisement while this one doe snot benefit from advertisement and has more sources than the other one. also this one was published in 2021 while the other one was published in 2018]]> 2023-01-17 08:59:37 UTC https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446538469 https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446539237 I believe that this site is trustable because it has evidence and time that is in 2021.. 

The other one is not trustable because it has somethings that they want to sell to you. ]]> 2023-01-17 09:00:24 UTC https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446539237 https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446539623 The 3rd one is more reliable because  
1: Author, The author has no benefits while the 4th one has advertising. 
2: Evidence The 3rd one has reference links while the 4th doesn't have any.  
3: Advertising is for 4th link. 
4: Timeliness, 3rd one is published 2021 while the 4th is published 2018  ]]> 2023-01-17 09:00:50 UTC https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446539623 https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446540582 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128240861000116

I believe that the 3rd website is more credible because it works for the government, while the 4th website is not trustworthy because it contains advertisements and sponsorships, in which they benefit from it. They also win at every other thing which is motivation and bias, evidence, author, and timeliness. ]]> 2023-01-17 09:01:55 UTC https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446540582 https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446540655 this wins in all topics

the 2nd loses in ALL topics]]> 2023-01-17 09:02:00 UTC https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446540655 workbnchin https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446541599 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128240861000116

I believe that ScienceDirect is more credible than NewScience. NewScience has a motivation, that being money, unlike Science Direct. Not only that, but ScienceDirect is more recent. The author of NewScience's also article works for the company, unlike ScienceDirect's. Although, neither have sources. (The citations on ScienceDirect's cite are what sites use ScienceDirect, not the evidence. Just look at the dates)]]> 2023-01-17 09:02:56 UTC https://padlet.com/mayhatemh/7sm1u6wrx2c5at1n/wish/2446541599