- 27% are between 15 and 20 years old (3 people).

- 18% are between 26 and 30 years old (2 people).

In summary, the majority of participants are in the 21-25 age range, which could influence social network usage patterns, as this group is one of the most active on digital platforms.

- Only one person, equivalent to 10%, works in Development and Software Technology.

- None of the respondents came from Industrial Engineering.

This predominance of people from the Sports Science field could reflect patterns of social network use oriented to health, fitness, and sports-related activities.

- 36% (4 people) use networks between 4 and 6 hours a day, indicating prolonged use.

- Only 9% (1 person) spend 30 minutes or less on social networks.

- No respondent spends 7 hours or more.

Overall, most respondents spend a moderate amount of time (1-3 hours), but a significant proportion spend more than 4 hours a day, which could indicate a strong presence of networks in their daily lives.

- 9% (1 person) disconnects between 4 and 6 hours.

- Another 9% (1 person) take breaks of 7 hours or more.

- No one reports taking breaks of 30 minutes or less.

This result suggests that most respondents take relatively short breaks, indicating a high frequency of social network use throughout the day, with only a small portion of users disconnecting for longer periods.

- 9% (1 person) have a neutral stance on the matter.

- Another 9% (1 person) believe that networks rarely affect mental health.

- None of the respondents are of the opinion that social networks never have an impact on mental health.

In summary, most perceive a significant impact of social networks on mental health, reflecting a growing awareness of their possible emotional and psychological effects.

- 18% (2 people) communicate on a weekly basis.

- 9% (1 person) do it monthly.

- 9% (1 person) never use social networks to communicate with their family.

- No one reported doing so annually.

This result reflects that the majority of respondents use social networks as a frequent means of family communication, highlighting their important role in maintaining close contact with loved ones. However, a small proportion do not use them for this purpose.

- Another 27% (3 people) have a neutral stance.

- 27% (3 people) are of the opinion that privacy is rarely sufficient.

- 9% (1 person) believe that it is never enough.

This result reflects a division of opinion among respondents. While some are confident in the security of the networks, a similar number have doubts or believe that privacy measures are not adequate to fully protect users. This could point to the need for greater transparency and improvements in the platforms' privacy policies.

- 4 “Neutral” responses: The majority of respondents are in a neutral position, suggesting that they are not completely convinced that social networks are educational, but they do not completely rule them out either.

- 3 “Maybe” responses: Some respondents see a possibility that social networking can be educational, but perhaps not consistently or systematically.

- 1 “Never” response: Only one respondent believes that social networking has no educational value.

This pattern suggests that there is a split perception between the educational utility of social networks, with a tendency to see them as potentially educational but with nuances or limitations. Most do not seem to have a firm position on this issue.

- 4 “Often” responses: A moderate group of people acknowledge that they regularly spend more time than they would like to on social networks.

- 5 “Sometimes” responses: The majority of respondents mention that they sometimes waste more time than they would like, suggesting that this is a common but not constant experience.

- 1 “Never” response: One person indicates that they never experience this problem, which could indicate a very controlled or conscious use of social networks.

In summary, most people acknowledge that they sometimes waste more time than they would like to on social networks, with few extreme cases and only one person who does not experience this phenomenon. This reflects a somewhat problematic relationship with time spent on networks.